Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 22:43 UTC

Graphify-Labs / graphify

Turn any codebase, with its docs, SQL schemas, configs, and PDFs, into a queryable knowledge graph. A /graphify skill for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Gemini CLI: local deterministic AST parsing, every edge explained, no vector store.

PythonApache-2.0★ 102,471 stars⑂ 9,946 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

Graphify-Labs/graphify holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (95/100) and lowest on Security (49/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Graphify LabsOrganization
331 followers2 public repossince Jun 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 3 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence18/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,342 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,342
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year18
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.9.32
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases1.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

76Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars102,471 stars
25/25Forks9,946 forks
14.1/15Watchers346 watchers
Inputs used
forks9,946
stars102,471
watchers346
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 76% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.755
How it's scored
28.9/42Issue resolution69% of issues closed
5.7/30PR acceptance135/715 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/21 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs135
open_issues370
closed_issues815
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d31
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.688
closed_unmerged_prs580
first_time_authors_30d11
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d21
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
18.1/25Owner reach331 followers of Graphify-Labs
3.7/25Track record2 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers331
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginGraphify-Labs
public_repos2
account_age_days37
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history200 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgraphifyy
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

95Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.graphify.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics19 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsclaude-code, graphrag, knowledge-graph, codex, openclaw, skills, antigravity, gemini, leiden, rag, tree-sitter, ai-agents, ast, code-analysis, code-search, cursor, developer-tools, llm, mcp
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.graphify.com
docs_sitehttps://www.graphify.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
2/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities23 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages29
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:graphifyy@0.9.32 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 29 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes411
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstraptests/fixtures/crate_a/Cargo.toml, tests/fixtures/crate_b/Cargo.toml, tests/fixtures/sample.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice53 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.53
toolchain_manifeststests/fixtures/crate_a/Cargo.toml, tests/fixtures/crate_b/Cargo.toml, tests/fixtures/sample.csproj, tests/fixtures/xaml_viewmodel/App.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePython without a type-check config
52.2/55Manageable file sizes17/331 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes263,929
source_files_sampled331
oversized_source_files17
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexample
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

102,471GitHub stars
100contributors
1,342commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
370open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 32 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 9,946 ⇿
0Stars
9,946Forks
10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

8,5009,0009,50010,0009,946852026-072026-072026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 10
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 22:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities23 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 29
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPInetworkx>=3.4pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=1.21pyproject.toml
PyPIrapidfuzz>=3.0pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter>=0.23.0,<0.26pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-python>=0.23,<0.26pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-javascript>=0.23,<0.26pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-typescript>=0.23,<0.25pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-go>=0.23,<0.26pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-rust>=0.23,<0.25pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-java>=0.23,<0.25pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-groovy>=0.1,<0.3pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-c>=0.23,<0.25pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-cpp>=0.23,<0.25pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-ruby>=0.23,<0.25pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-c-sharp>=0.23,<0.25pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-kotlin>=1.0,<2.0pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-scala>=0.23,<0.27pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-php>=0.23,<0.25pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-swift>=0.7,<0.9pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-lua>=0.2,<0.6pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-zig>=1.0,<2.0pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-powershell>=0.26,<0.28pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-elixir>=0.3,<0.5pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-objc>=3.0,<4.0pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-julia>=0.23,<0.25pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-verilog>=1.0,<2.0pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-fortran>=0.6,<0.8pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-bash>=0.23,<0.27pyproject.toml
PyPItree-sitter-json>=0.23,<0.26pyproject.toml
All dependencies 215

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 32 direct and 183 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPInetworkx3.4.2direct
PyPInetworkx3.6.1direct
PyPInumpy1.26.4direct
PyPInumpy2.4.6direct
PyPIrapidfuzz3.14.5direct
PyPItree-sitterdirect
PyPItree-sitter0.25.2direct
PyPItree-sitter-bash0.25.1direct
PyPItree-sitter-c0.24.2direct
PyPItree-sitter-c-sharp0.23.5direct
PyPItree-sitter-cpp0.23.4direct
PyPItree-sitter-elixir0.3.5direct
PyPItree-sitter-fortran0.6.0direct
PyPItree-sitter-go0.25.0direct
PyPItree-sitter-groovy0.1.2direct
PyPItree-sitter-java0.23.5direct
PyPItree-sitter-javascript0.25.0direct
PyPItree-sitter-json0.24.8direct
PyPItree-sitter-julia0.23.1direct
PyPItree-sitter-kotlin1.1.0direct
PyPItree-sitter-lua0.5.0direct
PyPItree-sitter-objc3.0.2direct
PyPItree-sitter-php0.24.1direct
PyPItree-sitter-powershell0.26.4direct
PyPItree-sitter-python0.25.0direct
PyPItree-sitter-ruby0.23.1direct
PyPItree-sitter-rust0.24.2direct
PyPItree-sitter-scala0.26.0direct
PyPItree-sitter-swift0.7.2direct
PyPItree-sitter-typescript0.23.2direct
PyPItree-sitter-verilog1.0.3direct
PyPItree-sitter-zig1.1.2direct
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanthropic0.105.2indirect
PyPIanyio4.13.0indirect
PyPIanytree2.13.0indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIautograd1.8.0indirect
PyPIav17.0.1indirect
PyPIbanditindirect
PyPIbandit1.9.4indirect
PyPIbeartype0.18.5indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.3indirect
PyPIboolean-py5.0indirect
PyPIboto31.43.9indirect
PyPIbotocore1.43.9indirect
PyPIbuildindirect
PyPIbuild1.5.0indirect
PyPIcachecontrol0.14.4indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.4.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIclick8.3.3indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.2indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.14.0indirect
PyPIcryptography49.0.0indirect
PyPIctranslate24.7.1indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIcyclonedx-python-lib11.7.0indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.18.0indirect
PyPIet-xmlfile2.0.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfalkordb1.6.1indirect
PyPIfaster-whisper1.2.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.0indirect
PyPIflatbuffers25.12.19indirect
PyPIfonttools4.63.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.4.0indirect
PyPIfuture1.0.0indirect
PyPIgensim4.4.0indirect
PyPIgraphifyy0.9.31indirect
PyPIgraspologic3.4.4indirect
PyPIgraspologic-native1.2.5indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.5.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.3indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.15.0indirect
PyPIhypothesisindirect
PyPIhypothesis6.153.0indirect
PyPIhyppo0.5.2indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjieba0.42.1indirect
PyPIjiter0.14.0indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjoblib1.5.3indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.5.0indirect
PyPIlicense-expression30.4.4indirect
PyPIllvmlite0.47.0indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkdownify1.2.2indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.10.9indirect
PyPImcp1.29.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImsgpack1.2.1indirect
PyPIneo4j6.2.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInuitkaindirect
PyPInuitka4.1indirect
PyPInumba0.65.1indirect
PyPIonnxruntime1.26.0indirect
PyPIopenai2.36.0indirect
PyPIopenpyxl3.1.5indirect
PyPIpackageurl-python0.17.6indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.3indirect
PyPIpandas3.0.3indirect
PyPIpatchelfindirect
PyPIpatchelf0.17.2.4indirect
PyPIpatsy1.0.2indirect
PyPIpillow12.2.0indirect
PyPIpip26.1.1indirect
PyPIpip-api0.0.34indirect
PyPIpip-auditindirect
PyPIpip-audit2.10.0indirect
PyPIpip-requirements-parser32.0.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.6indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpot0.9.6.post1indirect
PyPIpre-commitindirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.0indirect
PyPIprotobuf7.34.1indirect
PyPIpsycopg3.3.4indirect
PyPIpsycopg-binary3.3.4indirect
PyPIpy-serializable2.1.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.14.2indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0indirect
PyPIpynndescent0.6.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpypdf6.13.3indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpyrightindirect
PyPIpyright1.1.409indirect
PyPIpytestindirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-covindirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.3.1indirect
PyPIpython-docx1.2.0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIpytz2026.2indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIredis8.0.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.5.9indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIruffindirect
PyPIruff0.15.14indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.17.0indirect
PyPIsafetyindirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.7.2indirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.8.0indirect
PyPIscipy1.15.3indirect
PyPIscipy1.17.1indirect
PyPIseaborn0.13.2indirect
PyPIsetuptoolsindirect
PyPIsetuptools82.0.1indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmart-open7.6.1indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.3indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.4.4indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPIstatsmodels0.14.6indirect
PyPIstevedore5.8.0indirect
PyPIthreadpoolctl3.6.0indirect
PyPItiktoken0.13.0indirect
PyPItokenizers0.23.1indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.3indirect
PyPItree-sitter-dm0.25.1indirect
PyPItree-sitter-hcl1.2.0indirect
PyPItree-sitter-pascal0.11.0indirect
PyPItree-sitter-sql0.3.11indirect
PyPItyper0.25.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.2indirect
PyPIumap-learn0.5.12indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.47.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.3.3indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwheelindirect
PyPIwheel0.47.0indirect
PyPIwrapt2.1.2indirect
PyPIyt-dlp2026.6.9indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:graphifyy@0.9.32 pulls in 29 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.