Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 11:20 UTC

Lone-Star-Cajun-Technologies / Polaris-CLO

TypeScriptNo license detected★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolMCP serverhow this is determined

Lone-Star-Cajun-Technologies/Polaris-CLO holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (75/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated 20 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Lone Star Cajun Technologies Organization
1 follower2 public repossince Aug 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@lsctech/polaris0.10.53,6666441 days agoaiagentorchestrationtaskchainworkflowgovernanceclilineargithubjira

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

64Moderate
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 20 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,403 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,403
human_commit_share0.88
days_since_last_push20
active_weeks_last_year10

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 35 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 41 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count35
latest_release_tagv0.10.3
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release41
mean_days_between_releases0.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

59Moderate
How it's scored
47.5/80Monthly downloads — 3,666 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@lsctech/polaris
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads3,666
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 75% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.754

Issue & PR responsiveness

60Moderate
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
26.9/30PR acceptance — 171/191 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs171
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs20
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

38Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
2.2/25Owner reach — 1 followers of Lone-Star-Cajun-Technologies
5.6/25Track record — 2 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers1
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginLone-Star-Cajun-Technologies
public_repos2
account_age_days396

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 41 days ago
20/20Version history — 64 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@lsctech/polaris
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish41

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

43Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 20 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages121
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@lsctech/polaris@0.10.5 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 121 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 71 of 88 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.807
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,473

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

74Good
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc.json
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 23 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.23
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 6/533 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes107,878
source_files_sampled533
oversized_source_files6

Machine-readable interfaces

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
2contributors
1,403commits, last 12 months
20days since last push
35releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 11:19 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities20 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@lsctech/polaris^0.7.0package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.29.0package.json
npmcommander^12.0.0package.json
npmignore^6.0.2package.json
npmtree-sitter^0.22.0package.json
npmtree-sitter-c^0.24.1package.json
npmtree-sitter-c-sharp^0.23.5package.json
npmtree-sitter-cpp^0.23.4package.json
npmtree-sitter-dart^1.0.0package.json
npmtree-sitter-go^0.25.0package.json
npmtree-sitter-javascript^0.23.1package.json
npmtree-sitter-python^0.23.6package.json
npmtree-sitter-rust^0.24.0package.json
npmtree-sitter-swift^0.7.1package.json
npmtree-sitter-typescript^0.23.2package.json
npmzod^3.23.8package.json
All dependencies 220

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 203 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@lsctech/polaris0.7.0direct
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk1.30.0direct
npmcommander12.1.0direct
npmignore6.0.2direct
npmtree-sitter0.22.4direct
npmtree-sitter-c0.23.6direct
npmtree-sitter-c0.24.1direct
npmtree-sitter-c-sharp0.23.5direct
npmtree-sitter-cpp0.23.4direct
npmtree-sitter-dart1.0.0direct
npmtree-sitter-go0.25.0direct
npmtree-sitter-javascript0.23.1direct
npmtree-sitter-python0.23.6direct
npmtree-sitter-rust0.24.0direct
npmtree-sitter-swift0.7.1direct
npmtree-sitter-typescript0.23.2direct
npmzod3.25.76direct
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk0.104.1indirect
npm@babel/runtime7.29.7indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.27.7indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.27.7indirect
npm@hono/node-server2.0.12indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.60.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.60.4indirect
npm@stablelib/base641.0.1indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/node25.9.1indirect
npm@vitest/expect3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/mocker3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/runner3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/spy3.2.6indirect
npm@vitest/utils3.2.6indirect
npmaccepts2.0.0indirect
npmajv8.20.0indirect
npmajv-formats3.0.1indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmbody-parser2.3.0indirect
npmbytes3.1.2indirect
npmcac6.7.14indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmchai5.3.3indirect
npmcheck-error2.1.3indirect
npmcontent-disposition1.1.0indirect
npmcontent-type1.0.5indirect
npmcontent-type2.0.0indirect
npmcookie0.7.2indirect
npmcookie-signature1.2.2indirect
npmcors2.8.6indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdeep-eql5.0.2indirect
npmdepd2.0.0indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmee-first1.1.1indirect
npmencodeurl2.0.0indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer1.7.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmesbuild0.27.7indirect
npmescape-html1.0.3indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmetag1.8.1indirect
npmeventsource3.0.7indirect
npmeventsource-parser3.0.8indirect
npmexpect-type1.3.0indirect
npmexpress5.2.1indirect
npmexpress-rate-limit8.5.2indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-sha2561.3.0indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.4indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfinalhandler2.1.1indirect
npmforwarded0.2.0indirect
npmfresh2.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.3indirect
npmhono4.12.27indirect
npmhttp-errors2.0.1indirect
npmiconv-lite0.7.2indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmip-address10.2.0indirect
npmipaddr.js1.9.1indirect
npmis-promise4.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjose6.2.3indirect
npmjs-tokens9.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-to-ts3.1.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema-typed8.0.2indirect
npmloupe3.2.1indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmedia-typer1.1.0indirect
npmmerge-descriptors2.0.0indirect
npmmime-db1.54.0indirect
npmmime-types3.0.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnan2.27.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.16indirect
npmnegotiator1.0.0indirect
npmnode-addon-api8.8.0indirect
npmnode-gyp-build4.8.4indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmon-finished2.4.1indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmparseurl1.3.3indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-to-regexp8.4.2indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpathval2.0.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.4indirect
npmpkce-challenge5.0.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.25indirect
npmproxy-addr2.0.7indirect
npmqs6.15.2indirect
npmrange-parser1.2.1indirect
npmraw-body3.0.2indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmrollup4.60.4indirect
npmrouter2.2.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsend1.2.1indirect
npmserve-static2.2.1indirect
npmsetprototypeof1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmside-channel1.1.0indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstandardwebhooks1.0.0indirect
npmstatuses2.0.2indirect
npmstd-env3.10.0indirect
npmstrip-literal3.1.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec0.3.2indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.16indirect
npmtinypool1.1.1indirect
npmtinyrainbow2.0.0indirect
npmtinyspy4.0.4indirect
npmtoidentifier1.0.1indirect
npmtree-sitter-cli0.23.2indirect
npmts-algebra2.0.0indirect
npmtype-is2.1.0indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmundici-types7.24.6indirect
npmunpipe1.0.0indirect
npmvary1.1.2indirect
npmvite7.3.5indirect
npmvite-node3.2.4indirect
npmvitest3.2.6indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmzod-to-json-schema3.25.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@lsctech/polaris@0.10.5 pulls in 121 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Lone-Star-Cajun-Technologies/Polaris-CLO. Read them side by side →

99cloudposse/atmosAtmos is the open-source runtime for infrastructure — it builds, authenticates, and ships Terraform, OpenTofu, Packer, Ansible, Kubernetes, Helm, and containers the same way on your laptop, in CI, and with AI agents.Exceptional99awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional98n8n-io/n8nFair-code workflow automation platform with native AI capabilities. Combine visual building with custom code, self-host or cloud, 400+ integrations.Exceptional97langgenius/difyBuild Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.Exceptional97vercel/workflowWorkflow SDK: Build durable, reliable, and observable apps and AI Agents in TypeScriptExceptional96zeroclaw-labs/zeroclawFast, small, and fully autonomous AI personal assistant infrastructure, any OS, any platform — deploy anywhere, swap anything 🦀Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.