Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 16:20 UTC

MarkBaker / PHPMatrix

PHP Class for handling Matrices

PHPMIT★ 1,514 stars⑂ 14 forkssince Aug 2018View on GitHub ↗

MarkBaker/PHPMatrix holds a health index of 29 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (68/100) and lowest on Vitality (21/100). It was last updated 866 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

29
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

29
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Mark BakerPersonal account
536 followers48 public repossince May 2011Recharge.com

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistmarkbaker/matrix3.0.19,349,471201363 days agomathematicsvectormatrix

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

21At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 866 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push866
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 4 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,882 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~53.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tag3.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,882
mean_days_between_releases53.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
51.6/60Stars — 1,514 stars
9.3/25Forks — 14 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks14
stars1,514
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 9,349,471 downloads/month across packagist
10.7/20Registry dependents — 39 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesmarkbaker/matrix
dependents39
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads320,689,513
monthly_downloads9,349,471
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 78% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.781
How it's scored
14/42Issue resolution — 33% of issues closed
25.9/30PR acceptance — 19/22 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs19
open_issues2
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.333
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
19.6/25Owner reach — 536 followers of MarkBaker
24.3/25Track record — 48 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers536
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginMarkBaker
public_repos48
account_age_days5,593
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
4/35Publish recency — latest publish 1,363 days ago
20/20Version history — 20 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmarkbaker/matrix
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1,363

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories20
affected_packages6
assessed_packages84
unassessed_packages3
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 4, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 84 resolved dependencies against OSV. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9.1/40Legible commit history — 17 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.17
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/46 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes17,145
source_files_sampled46
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,514GitHub stars
3contributors
0commits, last 12 months
866days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
2open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 14 ⇿
0Stars
14Forks
4Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151422019-122023-022026-04
Major 1Minor 0Patch 3

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10
3.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 16:19 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsinternal error: internal error: Client.Repositories.ListStatuses: internal error: ListStatuses: GET https://api.github.com/repos/MarkBaker/PHPMatrix/commits/ccd4f549374c6c1bd78e926c470794f432466411/statuses: 401 Bad credentials []
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 87

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 87 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistcilex/cilex 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistcilex/console-service-provider1.0.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/ca-bundle 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre 2-dev.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.3indirect
Packagistcontainer-interop/container-interop1.2.0indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer—indirect
Packagistdoctrine/annotations 1.14-dev.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator 1.5-dev.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer 1.3-dev.0indirect
Packagisterusev/parsedown—indirect
Packagistjms/metadata 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistjms/parser-lib1.1-devindirect
Packagistjms/serializer1.7.1indirect
Packagistmonolog/monolog 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistpadraic/humbug_get_contents1.1.2indirect
Packagistpadraic/phar-updater1.0-devindirect
Packagistpdepend/pdepend 2-dev.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest 2.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpcollection/phpcollection0.6.0indirect
Packagistphpcompatibility/php-compatibility9.3.5indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/fileset1.0.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/graphviz1.0.4indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/phpdocumentor 2.9-dev.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection 3.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock2.0.5indirect
Packagistphploc/phploc4.0.1indirect
Packagistphpmd/phpmd2.13.0indirect
Packagistphpoption/phpoption1.9-devindirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage 7.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator 2.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template1.2.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer 2.1-dev.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-token-stream 3.1-dev.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit 8.5-dev.0indirect
Packagistpimple/pimple 1.1-dev.0indirect
Packagistpsr/cache1.0.1indirect
Packagistpsr/container 1.1-dev.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log1.1.4indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup 1.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator 3.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff 3.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment 4.2-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter 3.1-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/finder-facade 1.2-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state 3.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator 3.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector 1.1-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/phpcpd4.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context 3.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations 2.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/type 1.1-dev.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version2.0.1indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer 3-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/config 2.8-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/console 2.8-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/debug 3.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection 3.2-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher 2.8-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem 3.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder 2.8-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.27-devindirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.27-devindirect
Packagistsymfony/process 2.8-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatch 2.8-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation 3.0-dev.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/validator 2.8-dev.0indirect
Packagisttheseer/fdomdocument1.6.7indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer1.2.1indirect
Packagisttwig/twig 1-dev.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.11.0indirect
Packagistzendframework/zend-cache2.8.3indirect
Packagistzendframework/zend-config2.6.0indirect
Packagistzendframework/zend-eventmanager3.3-devindirect
Packagistzendframework/zend-filter 2.10-dev.0indirect
Packagistzendframework/zend-hydrator1.1.0indirect
Packagistzendframework/zend-i18n 2.11-dev.0indirect
Packagistzendframework/zend-json 3.2-dev.0indirect
Packagistzendframework/zend-serializer 2.10-dev.0indirect
Packagistzendframework/zend-servicemanager2.7.11indirect
Packagistzendframework/zend-stdlib2.7-devindirect
Packagistzetacomponents/base1.9.4indirect
Packagistzetacomponents/document—indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 84 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
twig/twig 1-dev.0indirectcritical143.27.0
doctrine/annotations 1.14-dev.0indirecthigh13.2.1
phpunit/phpunit 8.5-dev.0indirecthigh112.5.8
squizlabs/php_codesniffer 3-dev.0indirecthigh14.0.2
symfony/process 2.8-dev.0indirecthigh28.0.5
symfony/validator 2.8-dev.0indirectmoderate17.1.4

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.