Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 22:40 UTC

NanmiCoder / cc-haha

Local-first cross-platform desktop workspace for Claude Code / agents: multi-agent, Git worktrees, code diffs, skill marketplace, multi-model, Computer Use, task-aware desktop pets, with WeChat, Feishu, DingTalk, Telegram, WhatsApp and H5 access.

TypeScriptMIT★ 14,239 stars⑂ 8,547 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindDesktop applicationMCP serverWeb interfaceTerminal interfaceLibraryhow this is determined
#agent#ai#ai-agent#anthropic#claude#claude-code#coding-agent#computer-use#desktop-app#electron#llm#mcp#react#typescript

NanmiCoder/cc-haha holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (87/100) and lowest on Security (37/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

程序员阿江-RelakkesPersonal account
2,772 followers47 public repossince Jan 2019MediaCrawler

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

79Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
15.2/36Commit cadence — 22/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,848 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,848
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year22

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 41 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~4.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count41
latest_release_tagv0.5.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases4.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

87Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

95Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 14,239 stars
25/25Forks — 8,547 forks
9.6/15Watchers — 55 watchers
Inputs used
forks8,547
stars14,239
watchers55
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

30At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 27 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled27
top_contributor_share0.948

Issue & PR responsiveness

59Moderate
How it's scored
37.6/42Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
16.7/30PR acceptance — 59/106 decided PRs merged
4.3/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs59
open_issues116
closed_issues987
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d11
issue_closed_ratio0.895
closed_unmerged_prs47
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d3

Ownership & stewardship

74Good
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
24.8/25Owner reach — 2,772 followers of NanmiCoder
24.2/25Track record — 47 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,772
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginNanmiCoder
public_repos47
account_age_days2,766
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — cchaha.ai
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 14 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagent, ai, ai-agent, anthropic, claude, claude-code, coding-agent, computer-use, desktop-app, electron, llm, mcp, react, typescript
has_wikino
homepagecchaha.ai
docs_sitecchaha.ai
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

37Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

37Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — no data
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Vulnerabilities. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

82Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/AGENTS.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, adapters/AGENTS.md, desktop/AGENTS.md, desktop/src/components/AGENTS.md, docs/AGENTS.md, docs/desktop/agents.md, docs/en/desktop/agents.md, docs/en/internals/agent.md, docs/internals/agent.md, site/AGENTS.md, src/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_files.github/AGENTS.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, adapters/AGENTS.md, desktop/AGENTS.md, desktop/src/components/AGENTS.md, docs/AGENTS.md, docs/desktop/agents.md, docs/en/desktop/agents.md, docs/en/internals/agent.md, docs/internals/agent.md, site/AGENTS.md, src/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes19,997

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

67Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checking — adapters/tsconfig.json, desktop/electron/tsconfig.json, desktop/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsadapters/tsconfig.json, desktop/electron/tsconfig.json, desktop/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsdesktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
52.9/55Manageable file sizes — 135/3,596 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes895,992
source_files_sampled3,596
oversized_source_files135

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

14,239GitHub stars
27contributors
1,848commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
41releases
1bus factor
116open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'claude-code-desktop' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8,547 ⇿
0Stars
8,547Forks
27Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

7,4007,6007,8008,0008,2008,4008,6008,547422026-052026-072026-08
Major 0Minor 3Patch 24
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10
3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 22:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/25 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
n/aVulnerabilitiesinternal error: vulnerabilitiesClient.ListUnfixedVulnerabilities: osvscanner.DoScan: client error: status="400 Bad Request" body={"code":3,"message":"error in query at index 92: rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = invalid hash"}
Direct dependencies 122
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@larksuiteoapi/node-sdk^1.60.0adapters/package.json
npm@whiskeysockets/baileys7.0.0-rc.9adapters/package.json
npmdingtalk-stream2.1.4adapters/package.json
npmgrammy^1.42.0adapters/package.json
npmundici^7.24.6adapters/package.json
npmws^8.18.0adapters/package.json
npm@dnd-kit/core^6.3.1desktop/package.json
npm@dnd-kit/sortable^10.0.0desktop/package.json
npm@dnd-kit/utilities^3.2.2desktop/package.json
npm@tailwindcss/typography^0.5.19desktop/package.json
npm@types/dompurify^3.2.0desktop/package.json
npm@xterm/addon-fit^0.11.0desktop/package.json
npm@xterm/xterm^6.0.0desktop/package.json
npmdompurify^3.3.3desktop/package.json
npmelectron-updater^6.8.3desktop/package.json
npmhtml2canvas^1.4.1desktop/package.json
npmkatex^0.16.45desktop/package.json
npmlucide-react^0.469.0desktop/package.json
npmmarked^15.0.7desktop/package.json
npmmermaid^11.14.0desktop/package.json
npmnode-pty^1.1.0desktop/package.json
npmprism-react-renderer^2.4.1desktop/package.json
npmprosemirror-commands^1.7.1desktop/package.json
npmprosemirror-history^1.5.0desktop/package.json
npmprosemirror-keymap^1.2.3desktop/package.json
npmprosemirror-model^1.25.11desktop/package.json
npmprosemirror-state^1.4.4desktop/package.json
npmprosemirror-view^1.42.2desktop/package.json
npmqrcode^1.5.4desktop/package.json
npmreact^18.3.1desktop/package.json
npmreact-diff-viewer-continued^4.2.0desktop/package.json
npmreact-dom^18.3.1desktop/package.json
npmreact-shiki^0.9.2desktop/package.json
npmshiki^4.0.2desktop/package.json
npmzustand^5.0.3desktop/package.json
npm@anthropic-ai/sandbox-runtime^0.0.44package.json
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk^0.80.0package.json
npm@aws-sdk/client-bedrock-runtime^3.1020.0package.json
npm@commander-js/extra-typings^14.0.0package.json
npm@growthbook/growthbook^1.6.5package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.29.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/api-logs^0.214.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/core^2.6.1package.json
npm@opentelemetry/resources^2.6.1package.json
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-logs^0.214.0package.json
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-metrics^2.6.1package.json
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-base^2.6.1package.json
npm@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions^1.40.0package.json
npmacorn^8.16.0package.json
npmacorn-walk^8.3.4package.json
npmajv^8.18.0package.json
npmasciichart^1.5.25package.json
npmauto-bind^5.0.1package.json
npmaxios^1.14.0package.json
npmbidi-js^1.0.3package.json
npmchalk^5.6.2package.json
npmchokidar^5.0.0package.json
npmcli-boxes^4.0.1package.json
npmcode-excerpt^4.0.0package.json
npmdiff^8.0.4package.json
npmemoji-regex^10.6.0package.json
npmenv-paths^4.0.0package.json
npmexeca^9.6.1package.json
npmfflate^0.8.3package.json
npmfigures^6.1.0package.json
npmfuse.js^7.1.0package.json
npmget-east-asian-width^1.5.0package.json
npmgoogle-auth-library^10.6.2package.json
npmhighlight.js^11.11.1package.json
npmhttps-proxy-agent^8.0.0package.json
npmignore^7.0.5package.json
npmindent-string^5.0.0package.json
npmink^6.8.0package.json
npmjsonc-parser^3.3.1package.json
npmlodash-es^4.17.23package.json
npmlru-cache^11.2.7package.json
npmmarked^17.0.5package.json
npmmedium-zoom^1.1.0package.json
npmp-map^7.0.4package.json
npmpicomatch^4.0.4package.json
npmproper-lockfile^4.1.2package.json
npmqrcode^1.5.4package.json
npmreact^19.2.4package.json
npmreact-reconciler^0.33.0package.json
npmsemver^7.7.4package.json
npmshell-quote^1.8.3package.json
npmsignal-exit^4.1.0package.json
npmstack-utils^2.0.6package.json
npmstrip-ansi^7.2.0package.json
npmsupports-hyperlinks^4.4.0package.json
npmtree-kill^1.2.2package.json
npmturndown^7.2.4package.json
npmtype-fest^5.5.0package.json
npmundici^7.24.6package.json
npmusehooks-ts^3.1.1package.json
npmvscode-jsonrpc^8.2.1package.json
npmvscode-languageserver-types^3.17.5package.json
npmwrap-ansi^10.0.0package.json
npmws^8.20.0package.json
npmxss^1.0.15package.json
npmyaml^2.8.3package.json
npmzod^4.3.6package.json
npmdompurify^3.3.0site/package.json
npmhighlight.js^11.11.1site/package.json
npmmarked^17.0.5site/package.json
npmmermaid^11.14.0site/package.json
npmreact^19.2.4site/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.4site/package.json
crates.iotauri=2.10.3desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-runtime=2.10.1desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-runtime-wry=2.10.1desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-shell2desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-dialog2desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-process2desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-updater2desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0.102desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.ioportable-pty0.9.0desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-notification2desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.iotauri-plugin-single-instance2desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
crates.ioreqwest0.13desktop/src-tauri/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with NanmiCoder/cc-haha. Read them side by side →

98QwenLM/qwen-codeAn open-source AI coding agent that lives in your terminal.Exceptional98novuhq/novuThe open-source communication infrastructure for agents and productsExceptional98ModelEngine-Group/nexentNexent is a zero-code platform for auto-generating production-grade AI agents using Harness Engineering principles — unified tools, skills, memory, and orchestration with built-in constraints, feedback loops, and control planes.Exceptional98googleapis/mcp-toolboxMCP Toolbox for Databases is an open source MCP server for databases.Exceptional98bytedance/deer-flowAn open-source long-horizon SuperAgent harness that researches, codes, and creates. With the help of sandboxes, memories, tools, skill, subagents and message gateway, it handles different levels of tasks that could take minutes to hours.Exceptional98ComposioHQ/composioComposio powers 1000+ toolkits, tool search, context management, authentication, and a sandboxed workbench to help you build AI agents that turn intent into action.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.