Public record
Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-02 23:50 UTC

Ogeon / palette

A Rust library for linear color calculations and conversion

RustApache-2.0★ 832 stars⑂ 69 forkssince Dec 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

Ogeon/palette holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (78/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (54/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Erik HedvallPersonal account
66 followers29 public repossince Mar 2010

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iocodegenpoints to another repo — not scored0.3.094,9837239 days ago
crates.iopalette0.7.71,804,157180 days agocolorconversionlinearpixelrgbgraphicsno-std
crates.iopalette_math0.7.733310 days agocolorconversionlinearpixelrgbgraphicsno-std
crates.iopalette_derive0.7.71,800,947130 days agoderivemacrospalette
crates.iointegration_testspoints to another repo — not scored0.1.031185 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
13.9/18Commit volume — 34 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year34
human_commit_share0.91
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year9
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 18 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~205.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count18
latest_release_tag0.7.7
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases205.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

78Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
47.4/60Stars — 832 stars
15.3/25Forks — 69 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks69
stars832
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 3,605,437 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagespalette, palette_math, palette_derive
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads25,965,545
monthly_downloads3,605,437
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 68% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 40 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled40
top_contributor_share0.678
How it's scored
31.8/42Issue resolution — 76% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance — 257/272 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs257
open_issues41
closed_issues127
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.756
closed_unmerged_prs15
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
13.1/25Owner reach — 66 followers of Ogeon
22.8/25Track record — 29 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers66
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginOgeon
public_repos29
account_age_days5,981
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 18 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespalette, palette_math, palette_derive
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2/2.5CI-Tests — 12 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection, packaging, signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories6
affected_packages2
assessed_packages44
unassessed_packages28
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 44 resolved dependencies against OSV. 28 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

54Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
24/40Legible commit history — 41 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.451
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, benchmarks/Cargo.toml, codegen/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — .github/actions/generate_release_notes/tsconfig.json, .github/actions/increment_version_number/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 9 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs.github/actions/generate_release_notes/tsconfig.json, .github/actions/increment_version_number/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, benchmarks/Cargo.toml, codegen/Cargo.toml, integration_tests/Cargo.toml, no_std_test/Cargo.toml, palette/Cargo.toml, palette_derive/Cargo.toml, palette_math/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.09
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.6/55Manageable file sizes — 5/199 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes712,367
source_files_sampled199
oversized_source_files5
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files

Key facts

832GitHub stars
40contributors
34commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
18releases
1bus factor
41open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'codegen' points at a different repository (https://gitlab.com/yovoslav/codegen.git); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch crates package 'no_std_test' from its registry
  • crates package 'integration_tests' points at a different repository (https://github.com/r3e-network/neo-llvm); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • deps.dev does not index crates:palette@0.7.7; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 69 ⇿
0Stars
69Forks
17Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063756922016-012021-022026-03
Major 0Minor 7Patch 10

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-02 23:50 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests12 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 2/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained12 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 24
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iopalette_mathcodegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0.86codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.86codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0.37codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iophf0.13.1codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iophf_codegen0.13.1codegen/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc0.2no_std_test/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaletteno_std_test/Cargo.toml
crates.iopalette_derive0.7.7palette/Cargo.toml
crates.iopalette_math0.7.7palette/Cargo.toml
crates.ioapprox0.5.0palette/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibm0.2.1palette/Cargo.toml
crates.iophf0.13.1palette/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.8.0palette/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0.103palette/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytemuck1.0.0palette/Cargo.toml
crates.iowide0.7.3palette/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2.0.13palette_derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0.0palette_derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.0palette_derive/Cargo.toml
crates.ioby_address1.2.1palette_derive/Cargo.toml
crates.iofind-crate0.6.0palette_derive/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibm0.2.1palette_math/Cargo.toml
crates.iowide0.7.3palette_math/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 72

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 55 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhowdirect
crates.ioapproxdirect
crates.ioby_addressdirect
crates.iobytemuckdirect
crates.iofind-cratedirect
crates.iolibcdirect
crates.iolibmdirect
crates.iopalette_derivedirect
crates.iopalette_mathdirect
crates.iophfdirect
crates.iophf_codegendirect
crates.ioproc-macro2direct
crates.ioquotedirect
crates.ioranddirect
crates.ioserdedirect
crates.iosyndirect
crates.iowidedirect
crates.iocodspeed-criterion-compatindirect
crates.iocriterionindirect
crates.iocsvindirect
crates.ioenterpolationindirect
crates.ioimageindirect
crates.iolazy_staticindirect
crates.iorand_mtindirect
crates.ioronindirect
crates.ioscadindirect
crates.ioserde_deriveindirect
crates.ioserde_jsonindirect
npm@actions/core2.0.3indirect
npm@actions/exec2.0.0indirect
npm@actions/github8.0.1indirect
npm@actions/http-client3.0.2indirect
npm@actions/io2.0.0indirect
npm@chevrotain/cst-dts-gen11.2.0indirect
npm@chevrotain/gast11.2.0indirect
npm@chevrotain/regexp-to-ast11.2.0indirect
npm@chevrotain/types11.2.0indirect
npm@chevrotain/utils11.2.0indirect
npm@iarna/toml2.2.5indirect
npm@kwsites/file-exists1.1.1indirect
npm@kwsites/promise-deferred1.1.1indirect
npm@octokit/auth-token6.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/core7.0.6indirect
npm@octokit/endpoint11.0.3indirect
npm@octokit/graphql9.0.3indirect
npm@octokit/openapi-types27.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest14.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods17.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/request10.0.8indirect
npm@octokit/request-error7.1.0indirect
npm@octokit/types16.0.0indirect
npm@simple-git/args-pathspec1.0.3indirect
npm@simple-git/argv-parser1.1.1indirect
npm@toml-tools/lexer1.0.0indirect
npm@types/iarna__toml2.0.5indirect
npm@types/node25.5.0indirect
npm@types/semver7.7.1indirect
npm@vercel/ncc0.38.4indirect
npmbefore-after-hook4.0.0indirect
npmchevrotain11.2.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmfast-content-type-parse3.0.0indirect
npmjson-with-bigint3.5.8indirect
npmlodash-es4.17.23indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmsemver7.7.4indirect
npmsimple-git3.36.0indirect
npmtunnel0.0.6indirect
npmtypescript6.0.2indirect
npmundici6.24.1indirect
npmundici-types7.18.2indirect
npmuniversal-user-agent7.0.3indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 44 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 28 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
lodash-es4.17.23indirecthigh24.18.0
undici6.24.1indirecthigh48.5.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.