Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-05 07:57 UTC

OmniPotentRPC / rgpot

A repository of potential energy surface functions

C++ · Cap'n Proto · RustMIT★ 4 stars⑂ 1 forksince Apr 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

OmniPotentRPC/rgpot holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (37/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

OmniPotentRPCOrganization
0 followers5 public repossince Jan 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIrgpot2.5.4-1015 days agopotentiallennard-jonesmetatomicrgpotpotlibdlopennanobindabi3
crates.iorgpot-core3.0.1418119 days agodlpackffimolecular-dynamicspotential-energyrpcapi-bindingsscience

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 439 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year439
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year18

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 16 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 9 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count16
latest_release_tagv3.0.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release9
mean_days_between_releases3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

37Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars4
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
35/80Monthly downloads — 418 downloads/month across crates, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesrgpot, rgpot-core
dependents
ecosystemscrates, pypi
total_downloads1,286
monthly_downloads418
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

52Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 29 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
32.3/42Issue resolution — 77% of issues closed
25.9/30PR acceptance — 38/44 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs38
open_issues3
closed_issues10
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d11
prs_decided_30d11
issue_closed_ratio0.769
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of OmniPotentRPC
6.7/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginOmniPotentRPC
public_repos5
account_age_days191

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on crates, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 9 days ago
20/20Version history — 11 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesrgpot, rgpot-core
ecosystemscrates, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish9

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

81Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://rgpot.rgoswami.me/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscomputational-chemistry, potential-energy-surfaces, rpc-client
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://rgpot.rgoswami.me/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 29 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:rgpot@2.5.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 1 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 96 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.96
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, potctl/Cargo.toml, rgpot-core/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C++ (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, potctl/Cargo.toml, rgpot-core/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C++ (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/141 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC++
largest_source_bytes51,792
source_files_sampled141
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files

Key facts

4GitHub stars
1contributors
439commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
16releases
1bus factor
3open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'potctl' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-05 07:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 29 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioclap4potctl/Cargo.toml
PyPInumpy>=1.24pyproject.toml
crates.iodlpk0.1.5rgpot-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeindir-core0.5.0rgpot-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iocapnp0.20rgpot-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iocapnp-rpc0.20rgpot-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1rgpot-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-util0.7rgpot-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures0.3rgpot-core/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 191

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 177 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iocapnp0.20.6direct
crates.iocapnp-rpc0.20.3direct
crates.ioclapdirect
crates.ioclap4.5.58direct
crates.ioclap4.6.1direct
crates.iodlpk0.1.3direct
crates.iodlpk0.1.5direct
crates.ioeindir-core0.5.0direct
crates.iofutures0.3.31direct
crates.iofutures0.3.32direct
crates.iotokio1.49.0direct
crates.iotokio1.52.3direct
crates.iotokio-util0.7.18direct
PyPInumpydirect
crates.ioanstream0.6.21indirect
crates.ioanstream1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.13indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse0.2.7indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.11indirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.101indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobitflags2.11.0indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.0indirect
crates.iobytes1.11.1indirect
crates.iobytes1.12.0indirect
crates.iocapnp-futures0.20.1indirect
crates.iocapnpc0.20.1indirect
crates.iocbindgen0.27.0indirect
crates.iocbindgen0.29.4indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.5.58indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.0indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.6.1indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.0.0indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.0indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.4indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.5indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.ioembedded-io0.6.1indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.3.0indirect
crates.iofastrand2.4.1indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.1.5indirect
crates.iofutures-channel0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-channel0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-executor0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-executor0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-io0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-io0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-macro0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-macro0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-sink0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-sink0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.32indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.1indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.iohalf2.4.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.15.5indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.16.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.4.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.ioid-arena2.3.0indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.13.0indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.17indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.ioleb128fmt0.1.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.182indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolibm0.2.16indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.11.0indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolog0.4.29indirect
crates.iolog0.4.33indirect
crates.iomatrixmultiply0.3.10indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.0indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.2indirect
crates.iomio1.1.1indirect
crates.iomio1.2.1indirect
crates.iondarray0.17.2indirect
crates.ionum-complex0.4.6indirect
crates.ionum-integer0.1.46indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.3indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.ioonce_cell_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.16indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.iopin-utils0.1.0indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.13.1indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic-util0.2.7indirect
crates.ioppv-lite860.2.21indirect
crates.ioprettyplease0.2.37indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.44indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.46indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorand0.9.4indirect
crates.iorand_chacha0.9.0indirect
crates.iorand_core0.9.5indirect
crates.iorand_distr0.5.1indirect
crates.iorawpointer0.2.1indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.3indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.4indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.27indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.149indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.150indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned0.6.9indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned1.1.1indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iosocket20.6.2indirect
crates.iosocket20.6.4indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.115indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.118indirect
crates.iotempfile3.25.0indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.iothiserror2.0.18indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.18indirect
crates.iotokio-macros2.6.0indirect
crates.iotokio-macros2.7.0indirect
crates.iotoml0.8.23indirect
crates.iotoml0.9.12+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime0.6.11indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime0.7.5+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_edit0.22.27indirect
crates.iotoml_parser1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_write0.1.2indirect
crates.iotoml_writer1.1.1+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.23indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iounicode-xid0.2.6indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.2+wasi-0.2.9indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.4+wasi-0.2.12indirect
crates.iowasip30.4.0+wasi-0.3.0-rc-2026-01-06indirect
crates.iowasm-encoder0.244.0indirect
crates.iowasm-metadata0.244.0indirect
crates.iowasmparser0.244.0indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.60.2indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.53.5indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.53.1indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.53.1indirect
crates.iowinnow0.7.14indirect
crates.iowinnow0.7.15indirect
crates.iowinnow1.0.3indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.57.1indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-core0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-rust0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen-rust-macro0.51.0indirect
crates.iowit-component0.244.0indirect
crates.iowit-parser0.244.0indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.52indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.52indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.21indirect
PyPIaseindirect
PyPImesonindirect
PyPImeson-pythonindirect
PyPImetatensor-coreindirect
PyPImetatensor-torchindirect
PyPImetatomic-torchindirect
PyPInanobindindirect
PyPIpytestindirect
PyPItorchindirect
PyPIvesinindirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:rgpot@2.5.4 pulls in 1 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI, crates.io.