Public recordGood
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 22:16 UTC
PythonWoods-Dev / zenzic
Deterministic Document Integrity Engine for Markdown/MDX graphs.
PythonWoods-Dev/zenzic holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
75
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
PythonWoodsPersonal account
0 followers7 public repossince May 2020
This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | zenzicpoints to another repo — not scored | 0.30.0 | - | 77 | 18 days ago | cidocument-integritydocumentationgraph-topologyjsonlinksmkdocssecuritysemverstatic-analysisstricttomlyamlzensical |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
82
Development activity
76Good
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 0 days ago |
| 12.5/36 | Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 365 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 365 |
| human_commit_share | 1 |
| days_since_last_push | 0 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 18 |
Release discipline
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 82 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 18 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~2.3 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 82 |
| latest_release_tag | v0.30.0 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 18 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 2.3 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
46
Popularity & adoption
5Critical
How it's scored
| 4.9/60 | Stars — 3 stars |
| 0/25 | Forks — 2 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 0 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 2 |
| stars | 3 |
| watchers | 0 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
92Excellent
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 13.5/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 6.3/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 8 |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | yes |
| readme_badge_services | shields.io |
| has_pull_request_template | yes |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
36
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
13Critical
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 0.1/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits |
| 4.1/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 3 contributors |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 3 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.994 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
64Moderate
How it's scored
| 31/42 | Issue resolution — 74% of issues closed |
| 24.4/30 | PR acceptance — 175/215 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 175 |
| open_issues | 5 |
| closed_issues | 14 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 24 |
| prs_decided_30d | 27 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.737 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 40 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
36Weak
How it's scored
| 10/30 | Ownership backing — personal (user) account |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts |
| 0/25 | Owner reach — 0 followers of PythonWoods-Dev |
| 18.6/25 | Track record — 7 public repos, account ~6 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 0 |
| owner_type | User |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | PythonWoods-Dev |
| public_repos | 7 |
| account_age_days | 2,293 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
96
Engineering practices
94Exceptional
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 9 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]) |
| 9.6/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 20/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | yes |
Documentation
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://zenzic.dev |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 8 topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | static-analysis, docs-as-code, markdown, ci-cd, graph-topology, mdx, python3, security-scanner |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | https://zenzic.dev |
| docs_site | https://zenzic.dev |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
68
Security posture
60Moderate
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 2.2/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| 2.5/2.5 | CI-Tests — 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/2.5 | Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 4.5/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9 |
| 3.5/5 | SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| 5/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 7.5/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 17 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 1 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 6 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
Dependency advisories
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 35/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| 25/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory |
| 0/40 | No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 0 |
| affected_packages | 0 |
| assessed_packages | 21 |
| unassessed_packages | 0 |
| affected_by_severity | none |
| direct_affected_packages | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:zenzic@0.30.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 21 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
73
Agent context & guidance
40Weak
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 40/40 | Legible commit history — 96 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.96 |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
86Excellent
How it's scored
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — justfile, noxfile.py |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]) |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — src/zenzic/py.typed |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — lockfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| 5/8 | Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| 9/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | uv.lock |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | no |
| bootstrap_files | justfile, noxfile.py |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | src/zenzic/py.typed |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | — |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
How it's scored
| 27/45 | Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/zenzic/py.typed) |
| 51.3/55 | Manageable file sizes — 10/148 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Python |
| largest_source_bytes | 92,059 |
| source_files_sampled | 148 |
| oversized_source_files | 10 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 0/20 | MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
3GitHub stars
3contributors
365commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
82releases
1bus factor
5open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- pypi package 'zenzic' points at a different repository (https://github.com/PythonWoods/zenzic); excluded from ecosystem scoring
More detail
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| 3 | Branch-Protection | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| 10 | CI-Tests | 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | Contributors | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 9 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9 |
| 7 | SAST | SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 10 | Vulnerabilities | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 8
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | typer | >=0.9.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | rich | >=15.0.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pyyaml | >=6.0.3 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pydantic | >=2.0.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | httpx | >=0.27,<1.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | google-re2 | >=1.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | tomli | >=2.0.0 | pyproject.toml |
| PyPI | pathspec | >=1.1.1 | pyproject.toml |
All dependencies 150
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 139 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | google-re2 | 1.1.20251105 | direct |
| PyPI | httpx | 0.28.1 | direct |
| PyPI | pathspec | 1.1.1 | direct |
| PyPI | pydantic | 2.12.5 | direct |
| PyPI | pydantic | 2.13.4 | direct |
| PyPI | pyyaml | 6.0.3 | direct |
| PyPI | rich | 14.3.3 | direct |
| PyPI | rich | 15.0.0 | direct |
| PyPI | tomli | 2.4.1 | direct |
| PyPI | typer | 0.24.1 | direct |
| PyPI | typer | 0.27.1 | direct |
| PyPI | annotated-doc | 0.0.4 | indirect |
| PyPI | annotated-doc | 0.0.5 | indirect |
| PyPI | annotated-types | 0.7.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | annotated-types | 0.8.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | anyio | 4.13.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | anyio | 4.14.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | argcomplete | 3.7.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | ast-serialize | 0.8.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | attrs | 26.1.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | babel | 2.18.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | backrefs | 8.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | boolean-py | 5.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | bracex | 3.0.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | bump-my-version | 1.5.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | cachecontrol | 0.14.4 | indirect |
| PyPI | certifi | 2026.2.25 | indirect |
| PyPI | certifi | 2026.7.22 | indirect |
| PyPI | cfgv | 3.5.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | charset-normalizer | 3.5.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | click | 8.3.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | click | 8.4.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | colorama | 0.4.6 | indirect |
| PyPI | colorlog | 6.12.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | coverage | 7.15.4 | indirect |
| PyPI | csscompressor | 0.9.5 | indirect |
| PyPI | cyclonedx-python-lib | 11.12.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | defusedxml | 0.7.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | dependency-groups | 1.3.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | distlib | 0.4.3 | indirect |
| PyPI | exceptiongroup | 1.3.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | execnet | 2.1.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | filelock | 3.32.3 | indirect |
| PyPI | ghp-import | 2.1.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | gitdb | 4.0.12 | indirect |
| PyPI | gitpython | 3.1.59 | indirect |
| PyPI | h11 | 0.16.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | hatchling | — | indirect |
| PyPI | htmlmin2 | 0.1.13 | indirect |
| PyPI | httpcore | 1.0.9 | indirect |
| PyPI | httpcore2 | 2.10.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | httpx2 | 2.10.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | httpx2-jsfetch | 1.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | humanize | 4.16.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | hypothesis | 6.165.7 | indirect |
| PyPI | identify | 2.6.19 | indirect |
| PyPI | idna | 3.11 | indirect |
| PyPI | idna | 3.18 | indirect |
| PyPI | iniconfig | 2.3.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | jinja2 | 3.1.6 | indirect |
| PyPI | jsmin | 3.0.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | jsonschema | 4.26.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | jsonschema-specifications | 2025.9.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | libcst | 1.9.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | librt | 0.15.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | license-expression | 30.4.4 | indirect |
| PyPI | linkify-it-py | 2.1.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | markdown | 3.10.3 | indirect |
| PyPI | markdown-it-py | 4.0.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | markdown-it-py | 4.2.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | markupsafe | 3.0.3 | indirect |
| PyPI | mdit-py-plugins | 0.6.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | mdurl | 0.1.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | mergedeep | 1.3.4 | indirect |
| PyPI | mkdocs | 1.6.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | mkdocs-get-deps | 0.2.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | mkdocs-material | 9.7.7 | indirect |
| PyPI | mkdocs-material-extensions | 1.3.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | mkdocs-minify-plugin | 0.8.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | mkdocs-rss-plugin | 1.19.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | msgpack | 1.2.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | mutmut | 3.7.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | mypy | 2.3.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | mypy-extensions | 1.1.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | nodeenv | 1.10.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | nox | 2026.8.10 | indirect |
| PyPI | packageurl-python | 0.17.6 | indirect |
| PyPI | packaging | 26.3 | indirect |
| PyPI | paginate | 0.5.7 | indirect |
| PyPI | pip | 26.2.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | pip-api | 0.0.34 | indirect |
| PyPI | pip-audit | 2.10.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | pip-requirements-parser | 32.0.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | platformdirs | 4.11.3 | indirect |
| PyPI | pluggy | 1.6.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | plugin-scaffold-demo | 0.1.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | pre-commit | 4.6.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | prompt-toolkit | 3.0.53 | indirect |
| PyPI | properdocs | 1.6.7 | indirect |
| PyPI | py-serializable | 2.1.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | pydantic-core | 2.41.5 | indirect |
| PyPI | pydantic-core | 2.46.4 | indirect |
| PyPI | pydantic-settings | 2.15.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | pygments | 2.20.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | pymdown-extensions | 11.0.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | pyparsing | 3.3.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | pytest | 9.1.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | pytest-cov | 7.1.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | pytest-timeout | 2.4.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | pytest-xdist | 3.8.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | python-dateutil | 2.9.0.post0 | indirect |
| PyPI | python-debian | 1.1.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | python-discovery | 1.5.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | python-dotenv | 1.2.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | python-magic | 0.4.27 | indirect |
| PyPI | pyyaml-env-tag | 1.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | pyyaml-ft | 8.0.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | questionary | 2.1.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | referencing | 0.37.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | requests | 2.34.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | reuse | 6.2.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | rich-click | 1.9.8 | indirect |
| PyPI | rpds-py | 0.30.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | rpds-py | 2026.6.3 | indirect |
| PyPI | ruff | 0.16.3 | indirect |
| PyPI | setproctitle | 1.3.7 | indirect |
| PyPI | shellingham | 1.5.4 | indirect |
| PyPI | six | 1.17.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | smmap | 5.0.3 | indirect |
| PyPI | sortedcontainers | 2.4.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | textual | 8.2.8 | indirect |
| PyPI | toml | 0.10.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | tomli-w | 1.2.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | tomlkit | 0.15.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | truststore | 0.10.4 | indirect |
| PyPI | types-pyyaml | 6.0.12.20260724 | indirect |
| PyPI | types-toml | 0.10.8.20260518 | indirect |
| PyPI | typing-extensions | 4.15.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | typing-extensions | 4.16.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | typing-inspection | 0.4.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | typing-inspection | 0.4.4 | indirect |
| PyPI | tzdata | 2025.3 | indirect |
| PyPI | uc-micro-py | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | urllib3 | 2.7.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | virtualenv | 21.7.4 | indirect |
| PyPI | watchdog | 6.0.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | wcmatch | 11.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | wcwidth | 0.8.2 | indirect |
| PyPI | zenzic | 0.30.0 | indirect |
| PyPI | zenzic | 0.5.0a2 | indirect |
Dependency advisories 0
Installing pypi:zenzic@0.30.0 pulls in 21 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.
No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.