Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 21:56 UTC

RedHatInsights / vulnerability-engine

Vulnerability Engine

PythonGPL-2.0★ 15 stars⑂ 64 forkssince Jun 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

RedHatInsights/vulnerability-engine holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (47/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

console.redhat.comOrganization
259 followers676 public repossince Jan 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

99Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
35.3/36Commit cadence — 51/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 389 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year389
human_commit_share0.81
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year51

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.85.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases1.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

38Weak
How it's scored
18.6/60Stars — 15 stars
15/25Forks — 64 forks
4.7/15Watchers — 8 watchers
Inputs used
forks64
stars15
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

57Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

62Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 41% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 46 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 17 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled46
top_contributor_share0.411

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent
How it's scored
40.4/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
25.7/30PR acceptance — 2,138/2,500 decided PRs merged
8.7/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 14/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs2,138
open_issues1
closed_issues25
prs_merged_7d7
prs_decided_7d7
prs_merged_30d21
prs_decided_30d22
issue_closed_ratio0.962
closed_unmerged_prs362
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d3

Ownership & stewardship

72Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
17.4/25Owner reach — 259 followers of RedHatInsights
25/25Track record — 676 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers259
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginRedHatInsights
public_repos676
account_age_days3,544

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.black], [tool.isort])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

72Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

65Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 14/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages165
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 165 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

54Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

46Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.getunleash.io/llms.txt)
30.9/40Legible commit history — 47 of 81 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.getunleash.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.58
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

66Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.black], [tool.isort])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespoetry.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54/55Manageable file sizes — 3/164 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes1,523,045
source_files_sampled164
oversized_source_files3

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

15GitHub stars
46contributors
389commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
1open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'vulnerability-engine' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 64 ⇿
0Stars
64Forks
94Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063756322018-072022-082026-09
Major 0Minor 12Patch 82

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 21:56 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 14/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 17 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 39
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpython-dateutil^2.8.2pyproject.toml
PyPIa2wsgi^1.10.4pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp^3.14.0pyproject.toml
PyPIaiokafka^0.13.0pyproject.toml
PyPIapp-common-python^0.2.7pyproject.toml
PyPIapscheduler^3.10.4pyproject.toml
PyPIasyncpg^0.31.0pyproject.toml
PyPIboto3^1.34.122pyproject.toml
PyPIbotocore^1.34.122pyproject.toml
PyPIcramjam=2.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIflask^3.1.1pyproject.toml
PyPIconnexion^3.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIgunicorn^23.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpeewee^3.18.1pyproject.toml
PyPIprometheus-client^0.25.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg2^2.9.9pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg-pool^3.2.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpy-flags^1.1.4pyproject.toml
PyPIpytz^2025.2pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests^2.32.5pyproject.toml
PyPIwatchtower^3.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg^3.1.19pyproject.toml
PyPIunleashclient<6.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIuvicorn^0.45.0pyproject.toml
PyPIPyYAML^6.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIprometheus-async^25.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrpds-py<=0.24.0pyproject.toml
PyPIkessel-sdk^2.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcython<3.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPImaturin=1.13.1pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-api~1.44.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk~1.44.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http~1.44.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-flask0.65b0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-requests0.65b0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-sqlalchemy0.65b0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-psycopg20.65b0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-psycopg0.65b0pyproject.toml
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-aiohttp-client0.65b0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 165

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 41 direct and 124 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIa2wsgi1.10.10direct
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3direct
PyPIaiokafka0.13.0direct
PyPIapp-common-python0.2.9direct
PyPIapscheduler3.11.3direct
PyPIasyncpg0.31.0direct
PyPIboto31.43.91direct
PyPIbotocore1.43.91direct
PyPIconnexion3.3.0direct
PyPIcramjam2.10.0direct
PyPIcython3.1.1direct
PyPIcython3.3.0direct
PyPIflask3.1.3direct
PyPIgunicorn23.0.0direct
PyPIkessel-sdk2.8.0direct
PyPImaturin1.13.1direct
PyPImaturin1.15.0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.44.0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http1.44.0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-aiohttp-client0.65b0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-flask0.65b0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-psycopg0.65b0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-psycopg20.65b0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-requests0.65b0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-sqlalchemy0.65b0direct
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk1.44.0direct
PyPIpeewee3.19.0direct
PyPIprometheus-async25.1.0direct
PyPIprometheus-client0.25.0direct
PyPIpsycopg3.3.5direct
PyPIpsycopg-pool3.3.1direct
PyPIpsycopg22.9.13direct
PyPIpy-flags1.1.4direct
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0direct
PyPIpytz2025.2direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIrpds-py0.24.0direct
PyPIunleashclient5.12.5direct
PyPIuvicorn0.45.0direct
PyPIwatchtower3.4.0direct
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.7.1indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.15.1indirect
PyPIasgiref3.12.1indirect
PyPIasn1crypto1.5.1indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIblinker1.9.0indirect
PyPIcachecontrol0.14.4indirect
PyPIcalver2025.10.20indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIclick8.5.0indirect
PyPIcoherent-licensed0.5.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.16.0indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdictionaries0.0.2indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIexpandvars1.1.2indirect
PyPIfcache0.6.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.6indirect
PyPIflit-core3.12.0indirect
PyPIflit-core4.0.2indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgitpython3.1.62indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.58.0indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.75.3indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.83.1indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhatch-fancy-pypi-readme25.1.0indirect
PyPIhatch-vcs0.5.0indirect
PyPIhatchling1.32.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.1indirect
PyPIinflection0.5.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIinsights-core3.8.1indirect
PyPIitsdangerous2.2.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.25.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIlockfile0.12.2indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImmh35.3.0indirect
PyPImsgpack1.2.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.8.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIoauthlib3.3.1indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-common1.44.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation0.65b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-dbapi0.65b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation-wsgi0.65b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-proto1.44.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventions0.65b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-util-http0.65b0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpdm-backend2.4.9indirect
PyPIpg80001.31.5indirect
PyPIpkgconfig1.6.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs3.11.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.8indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpoetry-core2.4.1indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIprotobuf7.35.1indirect
PyPIpuccinialin0.1.0indirect
PyPIpur7.4.0indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-aiohttp1.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-box7.4.1indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.0indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.32indirect
PyPIredis8.1.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests-oauthlib2.0.0indirect
PyPIrpm0.4.0indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.19.2indirect
PyPIschema0.7.8indirect
PyPIscramp1.4.17indirect
PyPIsemantic-version2.10.0indirect
PyPIsemver3.0.4indirect
PyPIsetuptools84.0.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools-rust1.11.1indirect
PyPIsetuptools-rust1.13.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools-scm10.2.3indirect
PyPIsetuptools-scm7.1.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.3indirect
PyPIstarlette1.6.0indirect
PyPIswagger-ui-bundle1.1.0indirect
PyPItesting-common-database2.0.3indirect
PyPItesting-postgresql1.3.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItqdm4.70.0indirect
PyPItrove-classifiers2026.6.1.19indirect
PyPItypes-protobuf6.32.1.20260221indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPItzlocal5.4.4indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvcs-versioning2.3.4indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.9indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.8indirect
PyPIwheel0.48.0indirect
PyPIwrapt2.4.0indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.5indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 165 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with RedHatInsights/vulnerability-engine. Read them side by side →

100apache/arrowApache Arrow is the universal columnar format and multi-language toolbox for fast data interchange and in-memory analyticsExceptional100scikit-learn/scikit-learnscikit-learn: machine learning in PythonExceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional100aws/serverless-application-modelThe AWS Serverless Application Model (AWS SAM) transform is a AWS CloudFormation macro that transforms SAM templates into CloudFormation templates.Exceptional100envoyproxy/envoyCloud-native high-performance edge/middle/service proxyExceptional100uxlfoundation/oneDNNoneAPI Deep Neural Network Library (oneDNN)Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.