Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 04:48 UTC

Respect / Validation

The most awesome validation engine ever created for PHP

PHPMIT★ 6,028 stars⑂ 774 forkssince Sep 2010View on GitHub ↗

Respect/Validation holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (38/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

93
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

93
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

RespectOrganization
29 followers36 public repossince Aug 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistrespect/validation3.1.2905,57915586 days agovalidatorrespectvalidation

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
24.9/36Commit cadence36/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume261 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year261
human_commit_share0.3
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year36

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases50 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 36 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~21 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count50
latest_release_tag2.5.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release36
mean_days_between_releases21
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

93Exceptional · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars6,028 stars
24.1/25Forks774 forks
12.7/15Watchers192 watchers
Inputs used
forks774
stars6,028
watchers192
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
79.4/80Monthly downloads905,579 downloads/month across packagist
17.8/20Registry dependents471 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesrespect/validation
dependents471
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads41,597,560
monthly_downloads905,579
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 58% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth97 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 47 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled97
top_contributor_share0.58
How it's scored
41.5/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
18.7/30PR acceptance764/1,223 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs764
open_issues8
closed_issues589
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.987
closed_unmerged_prs459
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
10.6/25Owner reach29 followers of Respect
23.4/25Track record36 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers29
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginRespect
public_repos36
account_age_days5,867

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 86 days ago
20/20Version history155 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesrespect/validation
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish86

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://respect-validation.readthedocs.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, validation, validation-engine, fluent-interface, validator, standalone, components
has_wikino
homepagehttps://respect-validation.readthedocs.io
docs_sitehttps://respect-validation.readthedocs.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 47 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages99
unassessed_packages3
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 99 resolved dependencies against OSV. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

38Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
21.3/40Legible commit history12 of 30 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.4
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance70 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/1,049 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes40,475
source_files_sampled1,049
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

6,028GitHub stars
97contributors
261commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
50releases
1bus factor
8open issues
Packagist, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-07-19: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 6028 stars today.

More detail

Star and fork history 6,031 ★ / 774 ⇿
6,031Stars
774Forks
49Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-19. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

01,2502,5003,7505,0006,2506,031753832011-032018-112026-07
Major 3Minor 10Patch 35

Each point covers 15 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 04:48 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 2/3 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 47 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistpsr/container^2.0composer.json
Packagistrespect/config^3.0composer.json
Packagistrespect/fluent^2.0composer.json
Packagistrespect/parameter^3.0composer.json
Packagistrespect/string-formatter^1.7composer.json
Packagistrespect/stringifier^3.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn^1.33composer.json
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring^1.33composer.json
All dependencies 102

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 94 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2direct
Packagistrespect/config3.0.1direct
Packagistrespect/fluent2.0.1direct
Packagistrespect/parameter3.0.0direct
Packagistrespect/string-formatter1.7.0direct
Packagistrespect/stringifier3.1.0direct
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-idn1.38.1direct
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.2direct
Packagistbrianium/paratest7.20.0indirect
Packagistbrick/math0.18.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.4.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer1.2.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/annotations2.0.2indirect
Packagistdoctrine/coding-standard14.0.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations1.1.6indirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.1indirect
Packagistegulias/email-validator4.0.4indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistfilp/whoops2.18.4indirect
Packagistgiggsey/libphonenumber-for-php-lite9.0.37indirect
Packagistjean85/pretty-package-versions2.1.1indirect
Packagistmikey179/vfsstream1.6.12indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.13.4indirect
Packagistnette/php-generator4.2.2indirect
Packagistnette/utils4.1.4indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.8.0indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collision8.9.4indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/termwind2.4.0indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest4.7.5indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin4.0.0indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-arch4.0.2indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-mutate4.0.1indirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-profanity4.2.1indirect
Packagistphar-io/manifest2.0.4indirect
Packagistphar-io/version3.2.1indirect
Packagistphpbench/container2.2.3indirect
Packagistphpbench/phpbench1.7.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock6.0.3indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver2.0.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer1.4.3indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.3indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.2.9indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-deprecation-rules2.0.5indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit2.0.18indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage12.5.7indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator6.0.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-invoker6.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template5.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer8.0.0indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit12.5.30indirect
Packagistpsr/cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/simple-cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistramsey/collection2.1.1indirect
Packagistramsey/uuid4.9.3indirect
Packagistrespect/coding-standard5.0.1indirect
Packagistrespect/fluentgen2.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/cli-parser4.2.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator7.1.8indirect
Packagistsebastian/complexity5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff7.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment8.1.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter7.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state8.0.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/lines-of-code4.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator7.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-reflector5.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context7.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/type6.0.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/version6.0.0indirect
Packagistseld/jsonlint1.12.1indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard8.29.0indirect
Packagistsokil/php-isocodes4.4.0indirect
Packagistsokil/php-isocodes-db-only4.0.8indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer4.0.4indirect
Packagiststaabm/side-effects-detector1.0.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/console8.1.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder8.1.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-deepclone1.42.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.41.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.42.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php851.41.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string8.1.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation8.1.5indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts3.7.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-exporter8.1.5indirect
Packagistta-tikoma/phpunit-architecture-test0.8.7indirect
Packagisttheseer/tokenizer2.0.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert2.4.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/glob4.7.0indirect
PyPImkdocsindirect
PyPImkdocs-awesome-pages-pluginindirect
PyPIpymdown-extensionsindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 99 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 3 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.