Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 15:32 UTC

TYPO3GmbH / blog

This blog extension uses TYPO3s core concepts and elements to provide a full-blown blog that users of TYPO3 can instantly understand and use.

PHP · HTMLGPL-2.0★ 45 stars⑂ 58 forkssince Feb 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryhow this is determined
#typo3-cms-extension#typo3#blog

TYPO3GmbH/blog holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (89/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (47/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TYPO3 GmbHOrganization
13 followers33 public repossince Dec 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistt3g/blog14.0.112,6333419 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

64Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
13.4/18Commit volume — 30 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year30
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year7

Release discipline

84Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 20 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 19 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~192.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count20
latest_release_tag14.0.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release19
mean_days_between_releases192.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

51Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

46Weak
How it's scored
26.7/60Stars — 45 stars
14.6/25Forks — 58 forks
5/15Watchers — 9 watchers
Inputs used
forks58
stars45
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (GPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, poser.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

60Moderate
How it's scored
54.7/80Monthly downloads — 12,633 downloads/month across packagist
5.2/20Registry dependents — 5 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagest3g/blog
dependents5
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads648,414
monthly_downloads12,633
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

61Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 45% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 37 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled37
top_contributor_share0.452

Issue & PR responsiveness

62Moderate
How it's scored
23.4/42Issue resolution — 56% of issues closed
21.6/30PR acceptance — 119/165 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 13/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs119
open_issues82
closed_issues103
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d8
issue_closed_ratio0.557
closed_unmerged_prs46
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

61Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
8.2/25Owner reach — 13 followers of TYPO3GmbH
23.2/25Track record — 33 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers13
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginTYPO3GmbH
public_repos33
account_age_days3,560

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 19 days ago
20/20Version history — 34 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagest3g/blog
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish19

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

89Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

88Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 15 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://typo3.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicstypo3-cms-extension, typo3, blog
has_wikino
homepagehttps://typo3.com
docs_sitehttps://typo3.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

62Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 15 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 13/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories4
affected_packages1
assessed_packages168
unassessed_packages33
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 168 resolved dependencies against OSV. 33 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

47Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

26At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt)
11.2/40Legible commit history — 21 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.typo3.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.21
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

59Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 6 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.06
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 1/160 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes126,762
source_files_sampled160
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

45GitHub stars
37contributors
30commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
20releases
2bus factor
82open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 't3g-blog' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 58 ⇿
0Stars
58Forks
19Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01020304050605722019-022022-092026-05
Major 5Minor 0Patch 14

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-08 15:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests15 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 13/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistpsr/http-client^1.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-factory^1.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-message^1.1 || ^2.0composer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-backend^13.4.15 || ^14.3 || 15.*.*@devcomposer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-core^13.4.15 || ^14.3 || 15.*.*@devcomposer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-extbase^13.4.15 || ^14.3 || 15.*.*@devcomposer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-extensionmanager^13.4.15 || ^14.3 || 15.*.*@devcomposer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-fluid^13.4.15 || ^14.3 || 15.*.*@devcomposer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-form^13.4.15 || ^14.3 || 15.*.*@devcomposer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-frontend^13.4.15 || ^14.3 || 15.*.*@devcomposer.json
Packagisttypo3/cms-install^13.4.15 || ^14.3 || 15.*.*@devcomposer.json
npmdatatables.net^3.0.2package.json
npmdatatables.net-bs5^3.0.2package.json
All dependencies 201

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 188 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmdatatables.net3.0.2direct
npmdatatables.net-bs53.0.2direct
Packagistpsr/http-client—direct
Packagistpsr/http-factory—direct
Packagistpsr/http-message—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-backend—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-core—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-extbase—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-extensionmanager—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-fluid—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-form—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-frontend—direct
Packagisttypo3/cms-install—direct
npm@babel/code-frame7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@discoveryjs/json-ext1.1.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/source-map0.3.11indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@parcel/watcher2.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-android-arm642.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-darwin-arm642.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-darwin-x642.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-freebsd-x642.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-glibc2.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-musl2.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-glibc2.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-musl2.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-glibc2.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-musl2.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-arm642.6.0indirect
npm@parcel/watcher-win32-x642.6.0indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/node26.2.0indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/ast1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/floating-point-hex-parser1.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-api-error1.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-buffer1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-numbers1.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-bytecode1.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-section1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/ieee7541.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/leb1281.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/utf81.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-edit1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-gen1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-opt1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-parser1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wast-printer1.14.1indirect
npm@xtuc/ieee7541.2.0indirect
npm@xtuc/long4.2.2indirect
npmacorn8.18.0indirect
npmajv8.20.0indirect
npmajv-formats2.1.1indirect
npmajv-keywords5.1.0indirect
npmansis4.0.0-node10indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmautoprefixer10.5.4indirect
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.11.15indirect
npmbrowserslist4.28.8indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001809indirect
npmchokidar5.0.0indirect
npmchrome-trace-event1.0.4indirect
npmclone-deep4.0.1indirect
npmcommander14.0.3indirect
npmcommander2.20.3indirect
npmcosmiconfig9.0.2indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmcss-loader7.1.4indirect
npmcssesc3.0.0indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.411indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.24.5indirect
npmenv-paths2.2.1indirect
npmenvinfo7.21.0indirect
npmerror-ex1.3.4indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.2indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmeslint-scope5.1.1indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmevents3.3.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.5indirect
npmfind-up4.1.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmfraction.js5.3.4indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmicss-utils5.1.0indirect
npmimmutable5.1.9indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.1indirect
npmimport-local3.2.0indirect
npminterpret3.1.1indirect
npmis-arrayish0.2.1indirect
npmis-core-module2.16.2indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-plain-object2.0.4indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmisobject3.0.1indirect
npmjest-worker27.5.1indirect
npmjiti2.7.0indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.1indirect
npmjson-parse-even-better-errors2.3.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmkind-of6.0.3indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmlocate-path5.0.0indirect
npmmerge-stream2.0.0indirect
npmmime-db1.54.0indirect
npmmini-css-extract-plugin2.10.2indirect
npmminimizer-webpack-plugin5.6.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmneo-async2.6.2indirect
npmnode-addon-api7.1.1indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.53indirect
npmp-limit2.3.0indirect
npmp-locate4.1.0indirect
npmp-try2.2.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmparse-json5.2.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpkg-dir4.2.0indirect
npmpostcss8.5.26indirect
npmpostcss-loader8.2.1indirect
npmpostcss-modules-extract-imports3.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-modules-local-by-default4.2.0indirect
npmpostcss-modules-scope3.2.1indirect
npmpostcss-modules-values4.0.0indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser7.1.5indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmreaddirp5.1.1indirect
npmrechoir0.8.0indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmresolve1.22.12indirect
npmresolve-cwd3.0.0indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmresolve-from5.0.0indirect
npmsass1.102.0indirect
npmsass-loader17.0.0indirect
npmschema-utils4.3.3indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmshallow-clone3.0.1indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsource-map-support0.5.21indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmtapable2.3.3indirect
npmterser5.50.0indirect
npmterser-webpack-plugin5.6.1indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.3.1indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmwatchpack2.5.2indirect
npmwebpack5.109.2indirect
npmwebpack-cli7.2.2indirect
npmwebpack-merge6.0.1indirect
npmwebpack-remove-empty-scripts1.1.1indirect
npmwebpack-sources3.5.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwildcard2.0.1indirect
Packagista9f/typo3-fractor—indirect
Packagistbk2k/bootstrap-package—indirect
Packagistbk2k/extension-helper—indirect
Packagistext-json—indirect
Packagistext-pdo—indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer—indirect
Packagistovertrue/phplint—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-deprecation-rules—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-strict-rules—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-belog—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-beuser—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-filelist—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-fluid-styled-content—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-lowlevel—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-rte-ckeditor—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-seo—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-setup—indirect
Packagisttypo3/cms-tstemplate—indirect
Packagisttypo3/testing-framework—indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 168 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 33 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
fast-uri3.1.5indirecthigh44.1.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with TYPO3GmbH/blog. Read them side by side →

88in2code-de/in2publish_corein2publish Community VersionExcellent86benjaminkott/bootstrap_packageBootstrap Package delivers a full configured theme for TYPO3, based on the Bootstrap CSS Framework.Excellent83dmind-gmbh/extension-cookiemanA GDPR tracking consent popup for the content management system TYPO3. It asks for approval to include tracking objects (cookies, images or any HTML) and includes the objects when consented.Excellent78wazum/sluggiTYPO3 CMS URL path & slug manager — auto-sync, redirects, locking, access control, duplicate prevention & moreGood75sypets/brofixCheck for broken links, forked from TYPO3 system extension linkvalidatorGood67maikschneider/bw_iconsTYPO3 extensions that provides an icon picker for TCA and RTE. Good

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.