Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 04:05 UTC

Tobi-De / fujin

Get your project up and running in minutes on your vps.

PythonMIT★ 15 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Oct 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#deployment#django#fastapi#litestar#python-p

Tobi-De/fujin holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (95/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated 80 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

TobiPersonal account
167 followers150 public repossince Jun 2018

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIfujin-cli0.27.1456180 days agocaddydeploymentdjangofastapilitestarpythonsystemd

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

53Moderate
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 80 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 226 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year226
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push80
active_weeks_last_year17

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 51 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 80 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~10.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count51
latest_release_tagv0.27.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release80
mean_days_between_releases10.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

19Critical
How it's scored
18.6/60Stars — 15 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars15
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

28At Risk
How it's scored
22.2/80Monthly downloads — 45 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesfujin-cli
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads45
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

60Moderate
How it's scored
34.2/42Issue resolution — 81% of issues closed
18/30PR acceptance — 9/15 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs9
open_issues11
closed_issues48
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.814
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

64Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
16/25Owner reach — 167 followers of Tobi-De
25/25Track record — 150 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers167
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginTobi-De
public_repos150
account_age_days3,010
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 80 days ago
20/20Version history — 61 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesfujin-cli
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish80

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

95Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

92Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://fujin.oluwatobi.dev/en/latest/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdeployment, django, fastapi, litestar, python-p
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://fujin.oluwatobi.dev/en/latest/
docs_sitehttps://fujin.oluwatobi.dev/en/latest/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

31At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 87 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages11
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:fujin-cli@0.27.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 11 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

82Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

72Good
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.7/40Legible commit history — 50 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.5
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes15,112

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

82Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — plugins/fujin-secrets-1password/src/fujin_secrets_1password/py.typed, plugins/fujin-secrets-bitwarden/src/fujin_secrets_bitwarden/py.typed, plugins/fujin-secrets-doppler/src/fujin_secrets_doppler/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 15 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsplugins/fujin-secrets-1password/src/fujin_secrets_1password/py.typed, plugins/fujin-secrets-bitwarden/src/fujin_secrets_bitwarden/py.typed, plugins/fujin-secrets-doppler/src/fujin_secrets_doppler/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.15
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (plugins/fujin-secrets-1password/src/fujin_secrets_1password/py.typed, plugins/fujin-secrets-bitwarden/src/fujin_secrets_bitwarden/py.typed, plugins/fujin-secrets-doppler/src/fujin_secrets_doppler/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/65 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes30,523
source_files_sampled65
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

15GitHub stars
1contributors
226commits, last 12 months
80days since last push
51releases
1bus factor
11open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.0 / 10
3.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 04:05 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained4 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities87 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIcappa>=0.31pyproject.toml
PyPImsgspec>=0.20pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv>=1.2.1pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=14.3.1pyproject.toml
PyPIssh2-python>=1.2.0.post1pyproject.toml
All dependencies 174

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 164 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIcappa0.25.1direct
PyPIcappa0.31.0direct
PyPImsgspec0.18.6direct
PyPImsgspec0.20.0direct
PyPIpython-dotenv—direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.0.1direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2direct
PyPIrich13.9.4direct
PyPIrich14.3.3direct
PyPIssh2-python1.2.0.post1direct
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.12.1indirect
PyPIanyio4.6.2.post1indirect
PyPIasgiref3.11.0indirect
PyPIasgiref3.11.1indirect
PyPIasgiref3.8.1indirect
PyPIastroid3.3.11indirect
PyPIastroid3.3.5indirect
PyPIbabel2.16.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbcrypt4.2.1indirect
PyPIbookstore0.1.2indirect
PyPIbracex2.5.post1indirect
PyPIbump-my-version0.28.1indirect
PyPIcertifi2024.8.30indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.2.25indirect
PyPIcffi1.17.1indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.6indirect
PyPIclick8.1.7indirect
PyPIclick8.3.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcryptography43.0.3indirect
PyPIdecorator5.1.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.2.15indirect
PyPIdjango—indirect
PyPIdjango5.1.3indirect
PyPIdjango5.2.12indirect
PyPIdjango6.0indirect
PyPIdjango6.0.3indirect
PyPIdjango-stubs-ext5.1.1indirect
PyPIdjango-stubs-ext6.0.1indirect
PyPIdjango-tasks—indirect
PyPIdjango-tasks0.10.0indirect
PyPIdjango-tasks0.12.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.2.2indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfabric3.2.2indirect
PyPIfaker33.0.0indirect
PyPIfastapi0.115.5indirect
PyPIfujin-cli—indirect
PyPIfujin-cli0.27.0indirect
PyPIfujin-secrets-1password0.26.1indirect
PyPIfujin-secrets-bitwarden0.26.1indirect
PyPIfujin-secrets-doppler0.26.1indirect
PyPIfujin-secrets-env0.26.1indirect
PyPIgevent24.11.1indirect
PyPIgit-cliff2.7.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.1.1indirect
PyPIgunicorn—indirect
PyPIgunicorn23.0.0indirect
PyPIgunicorn25.1.0indirect
PyPIh110.14.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.7indirect
PyPIhttpx0.27.2indirect
PyPIidna3.10indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIimagesize1.4.1indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIinvoke2.2.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.4indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIlitestar2.13.0indirect
PyPIlitestar-htmx0.3.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py3.0.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.2indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.4.2indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.5.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.1.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser4.0.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser4.0.1indirect
PyPImyst-parser5.0.0indirect
PyPIpackaging24.1indirect
PyPIpackaging24.2indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIparamiko3.5.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpolyfactory2.18.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.48indirect
PyPIpsutil6.1.0indirect
PyPIpycparser2.22indirect
PyPIpydantic2.10.1indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.27.1indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.6.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.18.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpygments-styles0.3.0indirect
PyPIpynacl1.5.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.2indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIquestionary1.10.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.3indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.5indirect
PyPIrich-click1.8.4indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools75.6.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools82.0.1indirect
PyPIshibuya2024.10.15indirect
PyPIshibuya2026.1.9indirect
PyPIsix1.16.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer2.2.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinx8.1.3indirect
PyPIsphinx9.0.4indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild2024.10.3indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild2025.8.25indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc20.5.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-copybutton0.5.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-design0.6.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-design0.7.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-exec-code0.14indirect
PyPIsphinx-exec-code0.18indirect
PyPIsphinx-togglebutton0.3.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-togglebutton0.4.4indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsqlparse0.5.1indirect
PyPIsqlparse0.5.2indirect
PyPIsqlparse0.5.5indirect
PyPIstarlette0.41.3indirect
PyPIstarlette0.52.1indirect
PyPItomli2.1.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItomli-w1.1.0indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.13.2indirect
PyPItype-lens0.2.3indirect
PyPItype-lens0.2.6indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.12.2indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItzdata2024.2indirect
PyPItzdata2025.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.2.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
PyPIuv-build—indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.32.1indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.42.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles0.24.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.1.1indirect
PyPIwcmatch10.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.2.13indirect
PyPIwebsockets14.1indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.0indirect
PyPIwheel0.45.1indirect
PyPIwheel0.46.3indirect
PyPIwrapt1.17.0indirect
PyPIzope-event5.0indirect
PyPIzope-interface7.1.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:fujin-cli@0.27.1 pulls in 11 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with Tobi-De/fujin. Read them side by side →

98strawberry-graphql/strawberryA GraphQL library for Python that leverages type annotations 🍓Exceptional98supabase/supabase-pyPython Client for Supabase. Query Postgres from Flask, Django, FastAPI. Python user authentication, security policies, edge functions, file storage, and realtime data streaming. Good first issue.Exceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional99django/djangoThe Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.Exceptional99ray-project/rayRay is an AI compute engine. Ray consists of a core distributed runtime and a set of AI Libraries for accelerating ML workloads.Exceptional99getsentry/sentryDeveloper-first error tracking and performance monitoringExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.