Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 01:27 UTC

YuZhengM / sciv

SCIV algorithm

PythonMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

YuZhengM/sciv holds a health index of 35 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (50/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (31/100). It was last updated 11 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

35
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

35
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 40 is calibrated to 35 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

YuZhengMinPersonal account
0 followers9 public repossince Jun 2018

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIsciv0.0.1961,85019011 days agocausal-variantfine-mappingscivsingle-cell-epiomicstraitscatac-seq

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

50Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 11 days ago
26.3/36Commit cadence — 38/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 211 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year211
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push11
active_weeks_last_year38

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

31At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

54Moderate
How it's scored
43.6/80Monthly downloads — 1,850 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagessciv
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads1,850
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

32At Risk · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

10Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

37Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of YuZhengM
19.3/25Track record — 9 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginYuZhengM
public_repos9
account_age_days2,997
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 11 days ago
20/20Version history — 190 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessciv
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish11

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

48Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

30At Risk
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

35Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

64Moderate
How it's scored
19.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: requests 2.32.3 (moderate 5.5)
9.4/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: lightning 2.6.5 (high 7.8)
35.2/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 456 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories6
affected_packages2
assessed_packages180
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the pypi:sciv@0.0.196 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 180 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

39Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

26At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.1/40Legible commit history — 49 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.49
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

44Weak
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
53.8/55Manageable file sizes — 1/44 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes66,095
source_files_sampled44
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
211commits, last 12 months
11days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
3.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 01:27 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 34
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPInumpy==2.2.6pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas>=2.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPImatplotlib==3.9.2pyproject.toml
PyPImatplotlib-venn==1.1.2pyproject.toml
PyPIseaborn==0.13.2pyproject.toml
PyPIscipy==1.15.3pyproject.toml
PyPIscanpy==1.11.5pyproject.toml
PyPIscikit-learn==1.5.2pyproject.toml
PyPInetworkx==3.3pyproject.toml
PyPIpalettable==3.3.3pyproject.toml
PyPIcolormap==1.0.4pyproject.toml
PyPIeasydev==0.13.2pyproject.toml
PyPIh5py>=3.11.0,<3.16.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhdf5plugin==6.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPImudata==0.3.2pyproject.toml
PyPIPyComplexHeatmap==1.8.5pyproject.toml
PyPIstatannotations==0.7.2pyproject.toml
PyPImagic-impute==3.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIleidenalg==0.10.2pyproject.toml
PyPIscvi-tools==1.3.3pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests==2.32.3pyproject.toml
PyPIyzm_file==0.0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIyzm_log==0.0.2pyproject.toml
PyPIharmonypy==0.0.10pyproject.toml
PyPIgseapy==1.1.9pyproject.toml
PyPIpysam>=0.22.1pyproject.toml
PyPIanndata==0.11.0pyproject.toml
PyPIforceatlas2-python==1.1pyproject.toml
PyPIlouvain==0.8.2pyproject.toml
PyPIsnapatac2==2.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPInumba==0.62.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpynndescent==0.5.13pyproject.toml
PyPIfa2-modified==0.4pyproject.toml
PyPIpsutil==7.2.1pyproject.toml
All dependencies 36

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 34 direct and 2 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIanndata0.11.0direct
PyPIcolormap1.0.4direct
PyPIeasydev0.13.2direct
PyPIfa2-modified0.4direct
PyPIforceatlas2-python1.1direct
PyPIgseapy1.1.9direct
PyPIh5py—direct
PyPIharmonypy0.0.10direct
PyPIhdf5plugin6.0.0direct
PyPIleidenalg0.10.2direct
PyPIlouvain0.8.2direct
PyPImagic-impute3.0.0direct
PyPImatplotlib3.9.2direct
PyPImatplotlib-venn1.1.2direct
PyPImudata0.3.2direct
PyPInetworkx3.3direct
PyPInumba0.62.0direct
PyPInumpy2.2.6direct
PyPIpalettable3.3.3direct
PyPIpandas—direct
PyPIpsutil7.2.1direct
PyPIpycomplexheatmap1.8.5direct
PyPIpynndescent0.5.13direct
PyPIpysam—direct
PyPIrequests2.32.3direct
PyPIscanpy1.11.5direct
PyPIscikit-learn1.5.2direct
PyPIscipy1.15.3direct
PyPIscvi-tools1.3.3direct
PyPIseaborn0.13.2direct
PyPIsnapatac22.9.0direct
PyPIstatannotations0.7.2direct
PyPIyzm-file0.0.3direct
PyPIyzm-log0.0.2direct
PyPIsphinx7.1.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme1.3.0rc1indirect
Dependency advisories 2

Installing pypi:sciv@0.0.196 pulls in 180 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
lightning2.6.5indirecthigh22022.6.15
requests2.32.3directmoderate42.33.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with YuZhengM/sciv. Read them side by side →

87scverse/muonmuon is a multimodal omics Python frameworkExcellent98kubevela/kubevelaThe Modern Application Platform.Exceptional87nette/utils🛠 Lightweight utilities for string & array manipulation, image handling, safe JSON encoding/decoding, validation, slug or strong password generating etc.Excellent81JelteF/derive_moreSome more derive(Trait) optionsExcellent80Kirky-X/trait-kitLightweight Rust module interface standard — centralized capability registry, dependency injection, and configuration management without heavy DI frameworksExcellent77nette/robot-loader🍀 RobotLoader: high performance and comfortable autoloader that will search and autoload classes within your application. Good

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.