Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 19:25 UTC

aboutcode-org / vulnerablecode

A free and open vulnerabilities database and the packages they impact. And the tools to aggregate and correlate these vulnerabilities. Sponsored by NLnet https://nlnet.nl/project/vulnerabilitydatabase/ for https://www.aboutcode.org/ Chat at https://gitter.im/aboutcode-org/vulnerablecode Docs at https://vulnerablecode.readthedocs.org/

Python · HTMLApache-2.0★ 702 stars⑂ 328 forkssince May 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolNetwork servicehow this is determined
#cve#security#security-tools#vulnerability-detection#vulnerability#vulnerability-databases#vulnerability-database#vulnerability-scanners#vulnerability-identification#vulndb#ossindex#snyk#nvd#cpe#cvss#osv#package-url#purl

aboutcode-org/vulnerablecode holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (53/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AboutCodeOrganization
274 followers150 public repossince Nov 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIvulnerablecodepoints to another repo — not scored40.0.12465265 days agoopen-sourcevulnerabilitysecuritycvepurlpackageurldependencypackagevulnerability-dbsbomsca

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

96Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
32.5/36Commit cadence — 47/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 642 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year642
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year47

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 62 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 65 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~10.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count62
latest_release_tagv40.0.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release65
mean_days_between_releases10.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

74Good
How it's scored
46.2/60Stars — 702 stars
21/25Forks — 328 forks
7.2/15Watchers — 21 watchers
Inputs used
forks328
stars702
watchers21
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

77Good
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 22% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 50 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled50
top_contributor_share0.22

Issue & PR responsiveness

51Moderate
How it's scored
19.8/42Issue resolution — 47% of issues closed
23.6/30PR acceptance — 752/954 decided PRs merged
3.2/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs752
open_issues707
closed_issues630
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d6
prs_decided_30d9
issue_closed_ratio0.471
closed_unmerged_prs202
first_time_authors_30d4
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d4

Ownership & stewardship

70Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
17.5/25Owner reach — 274 followers of aboutcode-org
22.6/25Track record — 150 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers274
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginaboutcode-org
public_repos150
account_age_days1,751

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.black], [tool.isort])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://public.vulnerablecode.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 18 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscve, security, security-tools, vulnerability-detection, vulnerability, vulnerability-databases, vulnerability-database, vulnerability-scanners, vulnerability-identification, vulndb, ossindex, snyk, nvd, cpe, cvss, osv, package-url, purl
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://public.vulnerablecode.io
docs_sitehttps://public.vulnerablecode.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

56Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 78 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

49Weak
How it's scored
3.9/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 6 affected: django 5.2.11 (critical 9.8), gitpython 3.1.41 (critical 9.8), lxml 6.0.2 (high 7.5), +3 more
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
19.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 5 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 192 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories98
affected_packages6
assessed_packages88
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 2, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages6
Matched the pypi:vulnerablecode@40.0.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 88 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 77 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.77
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

66Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.black], [tool.isort])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 4/498 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes133,528
source_files_sampled498
oversized_source_files4

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

702GitHub stars
50contributors
642commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
62releases
3bus factor
707open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • pypi package 'vulnerablecode' points at a different repository (https://github.com/nexB/vulnerablecode); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 328 ⇿
0Stars
328Forks
62Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

012525037532482017-062022-012026-09
Major 11Minor 19Patch 17

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 19:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 4/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities78 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 37
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIDjango==5.2.11setup.cfg
PyPIpsycopg2-binary==2.9.11setup.cfg
PyPIdjangorestframework==3.15.2setup.cfg
PyPIdjango-extensions==3.2.3setup.cfg
PyPIdjango-filter==24.3setup.cfg
PyPIdjango-widget-tweaks==1.5.0setup.cfg
PyPIdjango-crispy-forms==2.3setup.cfg
PyPIcrispy-bootstrap4==2024.1setup.cfg
PyPIdjango-environ==0.11.2setup.cfg
PyPIgunicorn==23.0.0setup.cfg
PyPIdjango-altcha==0.2.0setup.cfg
PyPIdrf-spectacular==0.24.2setup.cfg
PyPIpackageurl-python==0.17.6setup.cfg
PyPIunivers==32.0.1setup.cfg
PyPIlicense-expression==30.3.1setup.cfg
PyPIbinaryornot==0.4.4setup.cfg
PyPIsaneyaml==0.6.1setup.cfg
PyPIbeautifulsoup4==4.13.0setup.cfg
PyPIpython-dateutil==2.8.2setup.cfg
PyPItoml==0.10.2setup.cfg
PyPIlxml==6.0.2setup.cfg
PyPIdefusedxml==0.7.1setup.cfg
PyPIMarkdown==3.5.0setup.cfg
PyPIdateparser==1.3.0setup.cfg
PyPIcvss==3.6setup.cfg
PyPIcwe2==3.0.0setup.cfg
PyPIGitPython==3.1.41setup.cfg
PyPIrequests==2.33.1setup.cfg
PyPIfetchcode==0.8.2setup.cfg
PyPIaboutcode.pipeline==0.1.0setup.cfg
PyPIdjango-rq==2.10.1setup.cfg
PyPIrq-scheduler==0.13.1setup.cfg
PyPIextractcode==31.0.0setup.cfg
PyPIpython-dotenv==0.20.0setup.cfg
PyPItexttable==1.6.4setup.cfg
PyPIuritemplate==4.2.0setup.cfg
PyPIaboutcode.federated==1.0.3setup.cfg
All dependencies 169

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 38 direct and 131 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaboutcode-federated1.0.3direct
PyPIaboutcode-pipeline0.1.0direct
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.13.0direct
PyPIbinaryornot0.4.4direct
PyPIcrispy-bootstrap42024.1direct
PyPIcvss3.6direct
PyPIcwe23.0.0direct
PyPIdateparser1.3.0direct
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1direct
PyPIdjango5.2.11direct
PyPIdjango-altcha0.2.0direct
PyPIdjango-crispy-forms2.3direct
PyPIdjango-environ0.11.2direct
PyPIdjango-extensions3.2.3direct
PyPIdjango-filter24.3direct
PyPIdjango-rq2.10.1direct
PyPIdjango-widget-tweaks1.5.0direct
PyPIdjangorestframework3.15.2direct
PyPIdrf-spectacular0.24.2direct
PyPIextractcode31.0.0direct
PyPIfetchcode0.8.2direct
PyPIgitpython3.1.41direct
PyPIgunicorn23.0.0direct
PyPIlicense-expression30.3.1direct
PyPIlxml6.0.2direct
PyPImarkdown3.5direct
PyPImarkdown3.5.0direct
PyPIpackageurl-python0.17.6direct
PyPIpsycopg2-binary2.9.11direct
PyPIpython-dateutil2.8.2direct
PyPIpython-dotenv0.20.0direct
PyPIrequests2.33.1direct
PyPIrq-scheduler0.13.1direct
PyPIsaneyaml0.6.1direct
PyPItexttable1.6.4direct
PyPItoml0.10.2direct
PyPIunivers32.0.1direct
PyPIuritemplate4.2.0direct
PyPIalabaster0.7.16indirect
PyPIaltcha1.0.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.6.2.post1indirect
PyPIasgiref3.8.1indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs23.2.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackcall0.2.0indirect
PyPIblack24.3.0indirect
PyPIboolean-py4.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2024.7.4indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIchardet4.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer2.0.12indirect
PyPIclick8.3.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcommoncode32.4.2indirect
PyPIcrontab1.0.5indirect
PyPIcryptography46.0.5indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIdjango-debug-toolbar6.2.0indirect
PyPIdoc8—indirect
PyPIdoc80.11.1indirect
PyPIdocutils0.17.1indirect
PyPIdrf-spectacular-sidecar2022.10.1indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIextractcode-7z16.5.210531indirect
PyPIextractcode-libarchive3.5.1.210531indirect
PyPIflot0.7.3indirect
PyPIfreezegun1.2.1indirect
PyPIfusepy3.0.1indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.9indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhtml5lib1.1indirect
PyPIhtmllistparse0.6.1indirect
PyPIid1.5.0indirect
PyPIidna3.7indirect
PyPIimagesize2.0.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources6.5.2indirect
PyPIinflection0.5.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipython8.10.0indirect
PyPIisort5.10.1indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.4.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.19.2indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.21.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools10.8.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInh30.3.4indirect
PyPIpackaging24.0indirect
PyPIparso0.8.6indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIpdfminer-six20260107indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpickleshare0.7.5indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.4indirect
PyPIpluggy1.0.0indirect
PyPIplugincode32.0.0indirect
PyPIpprintpp0.4.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpy1.11.0indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.8.0indirect
PyPIpycparser2.21indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpyinstrument5.1.2indirect
PyPIpytest7.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-django4.5.2indirect
PyPIpytz2024.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.1indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer43.0indirect
PyPIredis6.2.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.36.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.2.28indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrestructuredtext-lint2.0.2indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich14.3.3indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIrq1.15.1indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsemantic-version2.9.0indirect
PyPIsemver3.0.4indirect
PyPIsetuptools82.0.1indirect
PyPIsix1.16.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.0.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.3.2indirect
PyPIsphinx—indirect
PyPIsphinx5.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild2024.10.3indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme—indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme1.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-django21.5indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsqlparse0.5.4indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIstarlette0.49.1indirect
PyPIstevedore5.7.0indirect
PyPItext-unidecode1.3indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItraitlets5.14.3indirect
PyPItwine6.2.0indirect
PyPItypecode30.2.0indirect
PyPItypecode-libmagic5.39.210531indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.13.0indirect
PyPItzlocal5.3.1indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.42.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.1.1indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.6.0indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.0indirect
PyPIwheel0.46.3indirect
Dependency advisories 6

Installing pypi:vulnerablecode@40.0.1 pulls in 88 packages, direct and transitive: 6 carry known advisories, of which 6 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
django5.2.11directcritical376.0.8
gitpython3.1.41directcritical513.1.59
lxml6.0.2directhigh26.1.0
markdown3.5.0directhigh23.8.1
djangorestframework3.15.2directmoderate43.17.2
python-dotenv0.20.0directmoderate21.2.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with aboutcode-org/vulnerablecode. Read them side by side →

99aquasecurity/trivyFind vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, secrets, SBOM in containers, Kubernetes, code repositories, clouds and moreExceptional98Checkmarx/kicsFind security vulnerabilities, compliance issues, and infrastructure misconfigurations early in the development cycle of your infrastructure-as-code with KICS by Checkmarx.Exceptional95future-architect/vulsAgent-less vulnerability scanner for Linux, FreeBSD, Container, WordPress, Programming language libraries, Network devicesExceptional94aquasecurity/trivy-operatorKubernetes-native security toolkitExceptional94wazuh/wazuhWazuh - The Open Source Security Platform. Unified XDR and SIEM protection for endpoints and cloud workloads.Exceptional94koda-ai-studio/agent-bomOpen security scanner and self-hosted control plane for AI, MCP, and cloud. One evidence model — run scans in your environment, centralize findings, govern in your VPC.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.