Public record
Software health reportschema 0.18.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-21 08:39 UTC

andresharpe / cute

Bulk upload and download of Contentful content (excel/csv/tsv/yaml/json/sql).

C#MIT★ 25 stars⑂ 1 forksince May 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

andresharpe/cute holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (42/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

81
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Andre SharpePersonal account
10 followers43 public repossince Apr 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetcute2.20.0-1430 days agoclicontentfulcsvexceltsvyamljsonopenaichatgptaijavascript

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
23.5/36Commit cadence34/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume131 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year131
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year34

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~7.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.20.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases7.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
22.4/60Stars25 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars25
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonbelow_threshold
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
48.7/80Total downloads48,132 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescute
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads48,132
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 64% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth5 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.637
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
28.5/30PR acceptance193/203 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 12/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs193
open_issues0
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
7.5/25Owner reach10 followers of andresharpe
24/25Track record43 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers10
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginandresharpe
public_repos43
account_age_days4,468
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history143 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescute
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

75Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscli, contentful, csv, excel, json, yaml
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-ReviewFound 12/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages44
unassessed_packages10
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 44 resolved dependencies against OSV. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes1/294 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes65,089
source_files_sampled294
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

25GitHub stars
5contributors
131commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 25 ★ / 1 ⇿
25Stars
1Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

051015202525112024-082025-062026-04

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-21 08:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 12/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained27 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 40
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetAzure.AI.OpenAI2.5.0-beta.1source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetBogus35.6.3source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetClosedXML0.105.0source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetcontentful.csharp8.4.3source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetCsvHelper33.1.0source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetDapper2.1.66source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetdotenv.net3.2.1source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetFuzzySharp2.0.2source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetGraphQL-Parser9.5.0source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetHtml2Markdown7.0.5.14source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient6.0.2source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite.Core9.0.6source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetMySql.Data9.3.0source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetNCrontab.Scheduler.AspNetCore1.2.10source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetNox.Cron8.0.5source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetNpgsql9.0.3source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetscriban7.2.5source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetSerilog4.3.0source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Extensions.Hosting9.0.0source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Console6.0.0source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.OpenTelemetry4.2.0source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetSharpCompress0.48.0source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetSharpZipLib1.4.2source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Hashing9.0.6source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetTextCopy6.2.1source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetYamlDotNet16.3.0source/Cute.Lib/Cute.Lib.csproj
NuGetColorfulCode1.0.0-preview1source/Cute/Cute.csproj
NuGetDeepL.net1.15.0source/Cute/Cute.csproj
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.Translation.V23.4.0source/Cute/Cute.csproj
NuGetMarkdig0.41.2source/Cute/Cute.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection9.0.6source/Cute/Cute.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection.Extensions9.0.6source/Cute/Cute.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection9.0.6source/Cute/Cute.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Azure.Containers.Tools.Targets1.21.2source/Cute/Cute.csproj
NuGetNox.Cron8.0.5source/Cute/Cute.csproj
NuGetSpectre.Console0.53.0source/Cute/Cute.csproj
NuGetSpectre.Console.Cli0.53.0source/Cute/Cute.csproj
NuGetSpectre.Console.ImageSharp0.53.0source/Cute/Cute.csproj
NuGetSystem.CommandLine2.0.0-beta4.22272.1source/Cute/Cute.csproj
NuGetSystem.Formats.Asn19.0.6source/Cute/Cute.csproj
All dependencies 54

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 39 direct and 15 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAzure.AI.OpenAI2.5.0-beta.1direct
NuGetBogus35.6.3direct
NuGetClosedXML0.105.0direct
NuGetColorfulCode1.0.0-preview1direct
NuGetcontentful.csharp8.4.3direct
NuGetCsvHelper33.1.0direct
NuGetDapper2.1.66direct
NuGetDeepL.net1.15.0direct
NuGetdotenv.net3.2.1direct
NuGetFuzzySharp2.0.2direct
NuGetGoogle.Cloud.Translation.V23.4.0direct
NuGetGraphQL-Parser9.5.0direct
NuGetHtml2Markdown7.0.5.14direct
NuGetMarkdig0.41.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection9.0.6direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection.Extensions9.0.6direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.SqlClient6.0.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite.Core9.0.6direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection9.0.6direct
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Azure.Containers.Tools.Targets1.21.2direct
NuGetMySql.Data9.3.0direct
NuGetNCrontab.Scheduler.AspNetCore1.2.10direct
NuGetNox.Cron8.0.5direct
NuGetNpgsql9.0.3direct
NuGetScriban7.2.5direct
NuGetSerilog4.3.0direct
NuGetSerilog.Extensions.Hosting9.0.0direct
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Console6.0.0direct
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.OpenTelemetry4.2.0direct
NuGetSharpCompress0.48.0direct
NuGetSharpZipLib1.4.2direct
NuGetSpectre.Console0.53.0direct
NuGetSpectre.Console.Cli0.53.0direct
NuGetSpectre.Console.ImageSharp0.53.0direct
NuGetSystem.CommandLine2.0.0-beta4.22272.1direct
NuGetSystem.Formats.Asn19.0.6direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Hashing9.0.6direct
NuGetTextCopy6.2.1direct
NuGetYamlDotNet16.3.0direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4indirect
NuGetFluentAssertions6.12.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.14.1indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.1indirect
PyPIapiflaskindirect
PyPIbs4indirect
PyPIdeepevalindirect
PyPIhleporindirect
PyPIjsonifyindirect
PyPIjsonpickleindirect
PyPInltkindirect
PyPInptypingindirect
PyPIpydebugindirect
PyPIrequestsindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 44 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 10 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.18.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.