Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 13:46 UTC

apache / maven-apache-parent

Apache Software Foundation Parent POM

Apache-2.0★ 48 stars⑂ 34 forkssince Nov 2017View on GitHub ↗

apache/maven-apache-parent holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (22/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

The Apache Software FoundationOrganization · verified domain
24,168 followers3,168 public repossince Jan 2009

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence — 33/52 weeks with commits
16.8/18Commit volume — 73 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year73
human_commit_share0.53
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year33
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 16 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 72 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~123.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count16
latest_release_tagapache-39
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release72
mean_days_between_releases123.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
27.1/60Stars — 48 stars
12.7/25Forks — 34 forks
7.5/15Watchers — 23 watchers
Inputs used
forks34
stars48
watchers23
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 37% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 37 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled37
top_contributor_share0.37
How it's scored
40.9/42Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
23.2/30PR acceptance — 294/380 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs294
open_issues6
closed_issues216
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d6
issue_closed_ratio0.973
closed_unmerged_prs86
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 24,168 followers of apache
25/25Track record — 3,168 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers24,168
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginapache
public_repos3,168
account_age_days6,443

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

54Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://maven.apache.org/pom/asf/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjava, build-management, maven
has_wikino
homepagehttps://maven.apache.org/pom/asf/
docs_sitehttps://maven.apache.org/pom/asf/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

40Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles—
manifestsdocs/pom.xml, pom.xml
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configyes

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages32
unassessed_packages14
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 32 resolved dependencies against OSV. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

22At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
20.1/40Legible commit history — 20 of 53 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.377
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — docs/pom.xml, pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 47 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsdocs/pom.xml, pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.47

Key facts

48GitHub stars
37contributors
73commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
16releases
2bus factor
6open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Language breakdown unavailable
  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (exit code 0; Skipping github.com/apache/maven-apache-parent: run: internal error: ListCommits:error during graphqlHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Something went wrong while executing your query on 2026-09-09T13:46:26Z. Please include `E0B0:BD31E:102D8C3:FA9D21:6AA16330` when reporting this issue.); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 34 ⇿
0Stars
34Forks
16Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383432018-112022-102026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 8 days.

Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.apache.apache.resources:apache-source-release-assembly-descriptor${version.apache-resource-bundles}pom.xml
All dependencies 46

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 45 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavenorg.apache.apache.resources:apache-source-release-assembly-descriptor1.8direct
Maveneu.maveniverse.maven.plugins:checksum-plugin3—indirect
Maveneu.maveniverse.maven.plugins:checksum-plugin30.2.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin3.2.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin1.8indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin3.8.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-checkstyle-plugin3.6.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-clean-plugin3.5.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin3.16.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-dependency-plugin3.11.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin3.1.4indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-ear-plugin3.4.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-enforcer-plugin3.6.3indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-enforcer-plugin3.9indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-failsafe-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin3.2.8indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-help-plugin3.5.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-install-plugin3.1.4indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-invoker-plugin3.10.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jar-plugin3.5.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin3.12.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-report-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-project-info-reports-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-project-info-reports-plugin3.9.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin3.3.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin3.3.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin3.5.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-scm-plugin2.2.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-scm-publish-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-scm-publish-plugin3.3.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-shade-plugin3.6.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin3.22.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin3.4.0indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-report-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-war-plugin3.5.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin0.18indirect
Mavenorg.apache.tooling:atr-maven-plugin—indirect
Mavenorg.apache.tooling:atr-maven-plugin1.0.0-beta-1indirect
Mavenorg.eclipse.m2e:lifecycle-mapping1.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 32 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.