Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 09:36 UTC

bluzky / salad_ui

Phoenix Liveview component library inspired by shadcn UI

Elixir · JavaScriptMIT★ 1,038 stars⑂ 69 forkssince May 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#elixir#liveview#phoenix#phoenix-liveview#tailwindcss

bluzky/salad_ui holds a health index of 50 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (69/100) and lowest on Vitality (30/100). It was last updated 345 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

50
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

50
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Dung NguyenPersonal account
119 followers99 public repossince Dec 2013OnPoint

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Hexsalad_ui1.0.0-beta.37,78028395 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

30At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

15Critical
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recency — last push 345 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
10/18Commit volume — 12 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year12
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push345
active_weeks_last_year2

Release discipline

52Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 636 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.9.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release636
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

70Good
How it's scored
48.9/60Stars — 1,038 stars
15.3/25Forks — 69 forks
5.3/15Watchers — 10 watchers
Inputs used
forks69
stars1,038
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

65Good
How it's scored
51.9/80Monthly downloads — 7,780 downloads/month across hex
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagessalad_ui
dependents—
ecosystemshex
total_downloads136,412
monthly_downloads7,780
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 79% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 20 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled20
top_contributor_share0.788

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good
How it's scored
31.1/42Issue resolution — 74% of issues closed
27.8/30PR acceptance — 125/135 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs125
open_issues21
closed_issues60
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.741
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

62Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14.9/25Owner reach — 119 followers of bluzky
25/25Track record — 99 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers119
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginbluzky
public_repos99
account_age_days4,596
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

79Good
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on hex
14/35Publish recency — latest publish 395 days ago
20/20Version history — 28 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessalad_ui
ecosystemshex
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish395

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

69Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://salad-storybook.fly.dev/welcome
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicselixir, liveview, phoenix, phoenix-liveview, tailwindcss
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://salad-storybook.fly.dev/welcome
docs_sitehttps://salad-storybook.fly.dev/welcome
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

34At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

34At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 5/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 43 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

31At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

40Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesmix.lock, package-lock.json, yarn.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Elixir without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/209 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageElixir
largest_source_bytes33,882
source_files_sampled209
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

1,038GitHub stars
20contributors
12commits, last 12 months
345days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
21open issues
Hex, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch npm package 'salad_ui' from its registry
  • Could not fetch hex package 'salad_storybook' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 09:36 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 5/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities43 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 28
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Hextw_merge~> 0.1mix.exs
Hexphoenix_live_view~> 1.0mix.exs
Hexigniter~> 0.5mix.exs
Hexsourceror~> 1.9mix.exs
Hexphoenix~> 1.7.10storybook/mix.exs
Hexphoenix_ecto~> 4.4storybook/mix.exs
Hexecto_sql~> 3.10storybook/mix.exs
Hexpostgrex>= 0.0.0storybook/mix.exs
Hexphoenix_html~> 4.0storybook/mix.exs
Hexphoenix_live_view~> 1.0.17storybook/mix.exs
Hexphoenix_live_dashboard~> 0.8.2storybook/mix.exs
Hexesbuild~> 0.8storybook/mix.exs
Hextailwind~> 0.2storybook/mix.exs
Hexswoosh~> 1.3storybook/mix.exs
Hexfinch~> 0.13storybook/mix.exs
Hextelemetry_metrics~> 0.6storybook/mix.exs
Hextelemetry_poller~> 1.0storybook/mix.exs
Hexgettext~> 0.20storybook/mix.exs
Hexjason~> 1.2storybook/mix.exs
Hexdns_cluster~> 0.1.1storybook/mix.exs
Hexplug_cowboy~> 2.5storybook/mix.exs
Hexphoenix_storybook~> 0.8storybook/mix.exs
Hexfloki~> 0.36storybook/mix.exs
Hexfaker~> 0.18storybook/mix.exs
Hexlive_debugger~> 0.2.4storybook/mix.exs
Hexlucide_icons~> 1.1storybook/mix.exs
Hexsalad_uibluzky/salad_uistorybook/mix.exs
Hexsalad_ui../storybook/mix.exs
All dependencies 117

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 117 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@alloc/quick-lru5.2.0indirect
npm@isaacs/cliui8.0.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/set-array1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.4.15indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.25indirect
npm@kurkle/color0.3.2indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@pkgjs/parseargs0.11.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/forms0.5.10indirect
npm@tailwindcss/typography0.5.16indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.1indirect
npmany-promise1.3.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.3indirect
npmarg5.0.2indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.3.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmcamelcase-css2.0.1indirect
npmchart.js4.4.5indirect
npmchartjs0.3.24indirect
npmchokidar3.6.0indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcommander4.1.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmcssesc3.0.0indirect
npmdidyoumean1.2.2indirect
npmdlv1.1.3indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.2indirect
npmfastq1.17.1indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmforeground-child3.1.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmglob10.4.1indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-core-module2.13.1indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjackspeak3.4.0indirect
npmjiti1.21.4indirect
npmlilconfig2.1.0indirect
npmlilconfig3.1.2indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmlodash.castarray4.4.0indirect
npmlodash.isplainobject4.0.6indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmlru-cache10.2.2indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmini-svg-data-uri1.4.4indirect
npmminimatch9.0.4indirect
npmminipass7.1.2indirect
npmmz2.7.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.11indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobject-hash3.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpath-scurry1.11.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.0.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpify2.3.0indirect
npmpirates4.0.6indirect
npmpostcss8.4.38indirect
npmpostcss-import15.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-js4.0.1indirect
npmpostcss-load-config4.0.2indirect
npmpostcss-nested6.0.1indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser6.0.10indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser6.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmread-cache1.0.0indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmresolve1.22.8indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.1.0indirect
npmsucrase3.35.0indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmtailwindcss3.4.4indirect
npmtailwindcss-animate1.0.7indirect
npmthenify3.3.1indirect
npmthenify-all1.6.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmts-interface-checker0.1.13indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi8.1.0indirect
npmyaml2.4.5indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with bluzky/salad_ui. Read them side by side →

80mishka-group/mishka_chelekomMishka Chelekom is a fully featured components and UI kit library for Phoenix & Phoenix LiveViewExcellent89naymspace/backpex Backpex is a highly customizable administration panel for Phoenix LiveView applications.Excellent86livebook-dev/livebookAutomate code & data workflows with interactive Elixir notebooksExcellent81phenixdigital/phoenix_storybookA pluggable storybook for your Phoenix components.Excellent78szTheory/mailglassPhoenix transactional email with preview/admin UIGood97supabase/realtimeBroadcast, Presence, and Postgres Changes via WebSocketsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Hex.