Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 20:57 UTC

bluzky / salad_ui

Phoenix Liveview component library inspired by shadcn UI

Elixir · JavaScriptMIT★ 1,050 stars⑂ 71 forkssince May 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

bluzky/salad_ui holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Vitality (57/100). It was last updated 29 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Dung NguyenPersonal account
120 followers100 public repossince Dec 2013OnPoint

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Hexsalad_ui1.0.07,0973029 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

57Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 29 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
17.8/18Commit volume — 95 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year95
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push29
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 690 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.9.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release690
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
49/60Stars — 1,050 stars
15.4/25Forks — 71 forks
5.3/15Watchers — 10 watchers
Inputs used
forks71
stars1,050
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
51.3/80Monthly downloads — 7,097 downloads/month across hex
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagessalad_ui
dependents—
ecosystemshex
total_downloads148,756
monthly_downloads7,097
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 80% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 21 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled21
top_contributor_share0.799
How it's scored
39.5/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
27.8/30PR acceptance — 150/162 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs150
open_issues5
closed_issues78
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.94
closed_unmerged_prs12
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
15/25Owner reach — 120 followers of bluzky
25/25Track record — 100 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers120
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginbluzky
public_repos100
account_age_days4,650
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on hex
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 29 days ago
20/20Version history — 30 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagessalad_ui
ecosystemshex
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish29

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://salad-storybook.fly.dev/welcome
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicselixir, liveview, phoenix, phoenix-liveview, tailwindcss
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://salad-storybook.fly.dev/welcome
docs_sitehttps://salad-storybook.fly.dev/welcome
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 31 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories21
affected_packages9
assessed_packages218
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 7, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 218 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
28.3/40Legible commit history — 53 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.53
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes9,272
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — mix.exs, storybook/mix.exs (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, Nix, lockfile
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixyes
has_testsyes
lockfilesmix.lock, package-lock.json, yarn.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifestsmix.exs, storybook/mix.exs
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Elixir without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/250 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageElixir
largest_source_bytes34,139
source_files_sampled250
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

1,050GitHub stars
21contributors
95commits, last 12 months
29days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
5open issues
Hex, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'salad_ui' from its registry
  • Could not fetch hex package 'salad_storybook' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 71 ⇿
0Stars
71Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325385063756942024-052025-062026-07
Major 0Minor 1Patch 0

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 20:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 14 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities31 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 27
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Hextw_merge~> 0.1mix.exs
Hexphoenix_live_view~> 1.2mix.exs
Hexigniter~> 0.6mix.exs
Hexsourceror~> 1.9mix.exs
Hexphoenix~> 1.8.1storybook/mix.exs
Hexphoenix_ecto~> 4.7storybook/mix.exs
Hexecto_sql~> 3.14storybook/mix.exs
Hexpostgrex~> 0.22storybook/mix.exs
Hexphoenix_html~> 4.3storybook/mix.exs
Hexphoenix_live_view~> 1.2storybook/mix.exs
Hexphoenix_live_dashboard~> 0.8.7storybook/mix.exs
Hexesbuild~> 0.10storybook/mix.exs
Hextailwind~> 0.5storybook/mix.exs
Hexswoosh~> 1.26storybook/mix.exs
Hexfinch~> 0.23storybook/mix.exs
Hextelemetry_metrics~> 1.0storybook/mix.exs
Hextelemetry_poller~> 1.3storybook/mix.exs
Hexgettext~> 1.0storybook/mix.exs
Hexjason~> 1.4storybook/mix.exs
Hexdns_cluster~> 0.2storybook/mix.exs
Hexplug_cowboy~> 2.9storybook/mix.exs
Hexphoenix_storybook~> 1.3storybook/mix.exs
Hexfloki~> 0.38storybook/mix.exs
Hexfaker~> 0.19storybook/mix.exs
Hexlucide_icons~> 2.2storybook/mix.exs
Hexsalad_uibluzky/salad_uistorybook/mix.exs
Hexsalad_ui../storybook/mix.exs
All dependencies 218

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 218 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@alloc/quick-lru5.2.0indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/css-color5.1.11indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/dom-selector7.1.1indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/generational-cache1.0.1indirect
npm@asamuzakjp/nwsapi2.3.9indirect
npm@bramus/specificity2.4.2indirect
npm@csstools/color-helpers6.1.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-calc3.3.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-color-parser4.1.10indirect
npm@csstools/css-parser-algorithms4.0.0indirect
npm@csstools/css-syntax-patches-for-csstree1.1.7indirect
npm@csstools/css-tokenizer4.0.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.10.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.2indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.23.5indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.7.0indirect
npm@eslint/core1.2.1indirect
npm@eslint/js10.0.1indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema3.0.5indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.7.2indirect
npm@exodus/bytes1.15.1indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.2indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.8indirect
npm@humanfs/types0.15.0indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@isaacs/cliui8.0.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/set-array1.2.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.4.15indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.25indirect
npm@kurkle/color0.3.2indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@pkgjs/parseargs0.11.0indirect
npm@tailwindcss/forms0.5.10indirect
npm@tailwindcss/forms0.5.11indirect
npm@tailwindcss/typography0.5.16indirect
npm@tailwindcss/typography0.5.20indirect
npm@types/esrecurse4.3.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npmacorn8.17.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.15.0indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.1indirect
npmany-promise1.3.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.3indirect
npmarg5.0.2indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbalanced-match4.0.4indirect
npmbidi-js1.0.3indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.3.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmbrace-expansion5.0.8indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmcamelcase-css2.0.1indirect
npmchart.js4.4.5indirect
npmchartjs0.3.24indirect
npmchokidar3.6.0indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcommander4.1.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmcss-tree3.2.1indirect
npmcssesc3.0.0indirect
npmdata-urls7.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdecimal.js10.6.0indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdidyoumean1.2.2indirect
npmdlv1.1.3indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmentities8.0.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint10.8.0indirect
npmeslint-scope9.1.2indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys5.0.1indirect
npmespree11.2.0indirect
npmesquery1.7.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.2indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfastq1.17.1indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.4.3indirect
npmforeground-child3.1.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmglob10.4.1indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmhtml-encoding-sniffer6.0.0indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-core-module2.13.1indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-potential-custom-element-name1.0.1indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjackspeak3.4.0indirect
npmjiti1.21.4indirect
npmjsdom29.1.1indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlilconfig2.1.0indirect
npmlilconfig3.1.2indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash.castarray4.4.0indirect
npmlodash.isplainobject4.0.6indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmlru-cache10.2.2indirect
npmlru-cache11.5.2indirect
npmmdn-data2.27.1indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmini-svg-data-uri1.4.4indirect
npmminimatch10.2.5indirect
npmminimatch9.0.4indirect
npmminipass7.1.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmmz2.7.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.11indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobject-hash3.0.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparse58.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpath-scurry1.11.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.0.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpify2.3.0indirect
npmpirates4.0.6indirect
npmpostcss8.4.38indirect
npmpostcss-import15.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-js4.0.1indirect
npmpostcss-load-config4.0.2indirect
npmpostcss-nested6.0.1indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser6.0.10indirect
npmpostcss-selector-parser6.1.0indirect
npmpostcss-value-parser4.2.0indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmprettier3.9.6indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmread-cache1.0.0indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmresolve1.22.8indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsaxes6.0.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.1.0indirect
npmsucrase3.35.0indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmsymbol-tree3.2.4indirect
npmtailwindcss3.4.4indirect
npmtailwindcss4.3.3indirect
npmthenify3.3.1indirect
npmthenify-all1.6.0indirect
npmtldts7.4.9indirect
npmtldts-core7.4.9indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtough-cookie6.0.2indirect
npmtr466.0.0indirect
npmts-interface-checker0.1.13indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmundici7.29.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmutil-deprecate1.0.2indirect
npmw3c-xmlserializer5.0.0indirect
npmwebidl-conversions8.0.1indirect
npmwhatwg-mimetype5.0.0indirect
npmwhatwg-url16.0.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi8.1.0indirect
npmxml-name-validator5.0.0indirect
npmxmlchars2.2.0indirect
npmyaml2.4.5indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 218 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
brace-expansion2.0.1indirecthigh55.0.9
brace-expansion5.0.8indirecthigh15.0.9
glob10.4.1indirecthigh111.1.0
minimatch9.0.4indirecthigh310.2.3
nanoid3.3.11indirecthigh35.1.16
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
postcss8.4.38indirecthigh48.5.23
postcss-selector-parser6.1.0indirectmoderate17.1.3
yaml2.4.5indirectmoderate12.8.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Hex.