Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 15:10 UTC

phenixdigital / phoenix_storybook

A pluggable storybook for your Phoenix components.

ElixirMIT★ 869 stars⑂ 97 forkssince Jul 2022View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

phenixdigital/phoenix_storybook holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on Security (46/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Phenix TechnologiesOrganization

14 followers5 public repossince Apr 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Hex	phoenix_storybook	1.4.1	43,645	30	2 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

90Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
27/36	Commit cadence — 39/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 247 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data

Inputs used

commits_last_year	247
human_commit_share	0.73
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	39

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 39 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 2 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~47.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	39
latest_release_tag	v1.4.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	2
mean_days_between_releases	47.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

71Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

69Good

How it's scored

47.7/60	Stars — 869 stars
16.5/25	Forks — 97 forks
5/15	Watchers — 9 watchers

Inputs used

forks	97
stars	869
watchers	9
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	codecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

77Good

How it's scored

61.9/80	Monthly downloads — 43,645 downloads/month across hex
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	phoenix_storybook
dependents	—
ecosystems	hex
total_downloads	1,704,895
monthly_downloads	43,645
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

30At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 81% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 48 contributors
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	48
top_contributor_share	0.813

Issue & PR responsiveness

90Excellent

How it's scored

39.7/42	Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
24/30	PR acceptance — 528/660 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 5/5 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data

Inputs used

merged_prs	528
open_issues	12
closed_issues	211
prs_merged_7d	1
prs_decided_7d	1
prs_merged_30d	6
prs_decided_30d	6
issue_closed_ratio	0.946
closed_unmerged_prs	132
first_time_authors_30d	4
first_time_prs_merged_30d	5
first_time_prs_decided_30d	5

Ownership & stewardship

56Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
8.5/25	Owner reach — 14 followers of phenixdigital
17.7/25	Track record — 5 public repos, account ~9 yr old

Inputs used

followers	14
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	phenixdigital
public_repos	5
account_age_days	3,423

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on hex
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20	Version history — 30 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	phoenix_storybook
ecosystems	hex
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — biome.json
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 4 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	elixir, liveview, phoenix, storybook
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk

How it's scored

0/30	Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25	Dependabot config
0/25	Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20	CodeQL workflow

Inputs used

source	file_signals
lockfiles	mix.lock, package-lock.json
manifests	assets/package.json, mix.exs
has_codeql_workflow	no
has_security_policy	no
has_dependabot_config	yes

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	11
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	193
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 3
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 193 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

21At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
21.2/40	Legible commit history — 29 of 73 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.397
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

73Good

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — mix.exs (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — biome.json
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 25 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	mix.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	mix.exs
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.25

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Elixir without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/170 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Elixir
largest_source_bytes	45,156
source_files_sampled	170
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

869GitHub stars

48contributors

247commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

39releases

1bus factor

12open issues

Hex, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch npm package 'phoenix_storybook' from its registry
OpenSSF Scorecard did not return a usable result (exit code 0; Skipping github.com/phenixdigital/phoenix_storybook: run: internal error: ListCommits:error during graphqlHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Something went wrong while executing your query on 2026-09-09T15:10:48Z. Please include `B126:E01B7:6B4B39:67B1ED:6AA176F6` when reporting this issue.); skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 97 ⇿

0Stars

97Forks

36Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 11Patch 24

Each point covers 4 days.

Direct dependencies 7

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Hex	no_warn	`.plts/storybook.plt`	mix.exs
Hex	phoenix	`~> 1.8.1`	mix.exs
Hex	phoenix_live_view	`~> 1.1.21 or ~> 1.2.0`	mix.exs
Hex	makeup_eex	`~> 2.0.2`	mix.exs
Hex	makeup_html	`~> 0.2.0`	mix.exs
Hex	jason	`~> 1.3`	mix.exs
Hex	mdex	`~> 0.12`	mix.exs

All dependencies 193

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 193 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	../deps/phoenix	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	../deps/phoenix_html	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	../deps/phoenix_live_view	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/biome	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-darwin-arm64	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-darwin-x64	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64-musl	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-x64	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-linux-x64-musl	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-win32-arm64	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@biomejs/cli-win32-x64	`2.5.12`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/core	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`1.11.1`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/wasi-threads	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/remapping	`2.3.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-runtime	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-android-arm64	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-darwin-arm64	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-darwin-x64	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-freebsd-x64	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-glibc	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm-musl	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-glibc	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-arm64-musl	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-glibc	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-linux-x64-musl	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-win32-arm64	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-win32-ia32	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@parcel/watcher-win32-x64	`2.5.1`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/cli	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/forms	`0.5.11`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/node	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-android-arm64	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-arm64	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-darwin-x64	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-freebsd-x64	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-arm64-musl	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-gnu	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-linux-x64-musl	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-wasm32-wasi	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tailwindcss/oxide-win32-x64-msvc	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	@tybys/wasm-util	`0.10.2`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	call-bind	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	chalk	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`1.9.3`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`6.0.6`	indirect
npm	define-properties	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	enhanced-resolve	`5.24.5`	indirect
npm	error-ex	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	es-abstract	`1.20.1`	indirect
npm	es-to-primitive	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.28.2`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	function.prototype.name	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	functions-have-names	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-symbol-description	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.10`	indirect
npm	has	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	has-bigints	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-property-descriptors	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	has-tostringtag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	hosted-git-info	`2.8.9`	indirect
npm	internal-slot	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-arrayish	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-bigint	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-boolean-object	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	is-callable	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.15.1`	indirect
npm	is-date-object	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-negative-zero	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-number-object	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	is-regex	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	is-shared-array-buffer	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	is-string	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	is-symbol	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-weakref	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jiti	`2.7.0`	indirect
npm	json-parse-better-errors	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.32.0`	indirect
npm	load-json-file	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.30.21`	indirect
npm	memorystream	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.8`	indirect
npm	mini-svg-data-uri	`1.4.4`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	mri	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	nice-try	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	node-addon-api	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	normalize-package-data	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	npm-run-all	`4.1.5`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.12.2`	indirect
npm	object-keys	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	object.assign	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	parse-json	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	path-type	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	pidtree	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	pify	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	read-pkg	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	regexp.prototype.flags	`1.4.3`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.8`	indirect
npm	semver	`5.7.2`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	shell-quote	`1.7.3`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	spdx-correct	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	spdx-exceptions	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	spdx-expression-parse	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	spdx-license-ids	`3.0.11`	indirect
npm	string.prototype.padend	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	string.prototype.trimend	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	string.prototype.trimstart	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	strip-bom	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`5.5.0`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	tailwindcss	`4.3.3`	indirect
npm	tapable	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	unbox-primitive	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	validate-npm-package-license	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	which	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	which-boxed-primitive	`1.0.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 193 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
shell-quote	`1.7.3`	indirect	critical	2	`1.9.0`
brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect	high	4	`5.0.9`
minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Hex.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records