Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 12:49 UTC

bmaltais / kohya_ss

PythonApache-2.0★ 12,637 stars⑂ 1,607 forkssince Oct 2022View on GitHub ↗

bmaltais/kohya_ss holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (75/100) and lowest on Security (42/100). It was last updated 80 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

bmaltaisPersonal account
1,234 followers155 public repossince May 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

54Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 80 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
16.4/18Commit volume — 66 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year66
human_commit_share0.92
days_since_last_push80
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 102 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~52 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv26.0.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release102
mean_days_between_releases52
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

75Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 12,637 stars
25/25Forks — 1,607 forks
11.3/15Watchers — 109 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,607
stars12,637
watchers109
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 51% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 25 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.508
How it's scored
32.9/42Issue resolution — 78% of issues closed
25/30PR acceptance — 543/651 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs543
open_issues529
closed_issues1,907
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.783
closed_unmerged_prs108
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
22.2/25Owner reach — 1,234 followers of bmaltais
25/25Track record — 155 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,234
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginbmaltais
public_repos155
account_age_days4,552
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 25 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 25 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 25 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 153 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
2.4/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 11 affected: onnx 1.17.0 (critical 9.1), torch 2.5.0+cu124 (critical 9.8), transformers 4.54.1 (critical 9.6), +8 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
12.5/40No advisories left outstanding — 10 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 589 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories311
affected_packages26
assessed_packages190
unassessed_packages14
affected_by_severitycritical 7, high 13, moderate 5, low 1
direct_affected_packages11
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 190 resolved dependencies against OSV. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, docs/AGENTS.md, kohya_gui/AGENTS.md, test/AGENTS.md, tests/AGENTS.md, tools/AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 76 of 92 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.826
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, docs/AGENTS.md, kohya_gui/AGENTS.md, test/AGENTS.md, tests/AGENTS.md, tools/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,180
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 14 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.14
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
52.6/55Manageable file sizes — 6/137 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes160,571
source_files_sampled137
oversized_source_files6
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

12,637GitHub stars
98contributors
66commits, last 12 months
80days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
529open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'kohya-ss' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,607 ⇿
0Stars
1,607Forks
67Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

5007501,0001,2501,5001,7501,607152023-082025-032026-10
Major 4Minor 10Patch 53

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 12:49 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests25 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 25 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
8SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities153 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 49
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIaccelerate>=1.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIaiofiles==23.2.1pyproject.toml
PyPIaltair==4.2.2pyproject.toml
PyPIbitsandbytes>=0.45.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdadaptation==3.2pyproject.toml
PyPIdiffusers==0.32.2pyproject.toml
PyPIeasygui==0.98.3pyproject.toml
PyPIeinops==0.7.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfairscale==0.4.13pyproject.toml
PyPIftfy==6.3.1pyproject.toml
PyPIgradio==6.17.3pyproject.toml
PyPIgradio-client==2.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhuggingface-hub==0.34.3pyproject.toml
PyPIimagesize==1.4.1pyproject.toml
PyPIinvisible-watermark==0.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIlibrary—pyproject.toml
PyPIlion-pytorch==0.2.3pyproject.toml
PyPIlycoris-lora==3.2.0.post2pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=1.26.0,<2pyproject.toml
PyPIomegaconf==2.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIonnx==1.17.0pyproject.toml
PyPIonnxruntime-gpu==1.19.2pyproject.toml
PyPIopen-clip-torch==2.32.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopencv-python==4.10.0.84pyproject.toml
PyPIpip—pyproject.toml
PyPIprodigy-plus-schedule-free==1.9.2pyproject.toml
PyPIprodigyopt==1.1.2pyproject.toml
PyPIprotobuf==4.25.8pyproject.toml
PyPIpy-cpuinfo—pyproject.toml
PyPIpytorch-optimizer==3.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=13.7.1pyproject.toml
PyPIsafetensors==0.4.5pyproject.toml
PyPIschedulefree==1.4pyproject.toml
PyPIscipy==1.11.4pyproject.toml
PyPIsentencepiece==0.2.1pyproject.toml
PyPItensorboard>=2.18.0pyproject.toml
PyPItensorflow>=2.16.1pyproject.toml
PyPItensorflow-io-gcs-filesystem==0.31.0pyproject.toml
PyPItensorflow-io-gcs-filesystem>=0.37.1pyproject.toml
PyPItimm>=0.9.2pyproject.toml
PyPItk==0.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPItoml==0.10.2pyproject.toml
PyPItorch>=2.5.0pyproject.toml
PyPItorchvision>=0.20.0pyproject.toml
PyPItransformers==4.54.1pyproject.toml
PyPItriton>=3.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIvoluptuous==0.15.2pyproject.toml
PyPIwandb==0.18.0pyproject.toml
PyPIxformers>=0.0.30pyproject.toml
All dependencies 204

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 74 direct and 130 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaccelerate—direct
PyPIaccelerate1.8.1direct
PyPIaiofiles23.2.1direct
PyPIaltair4.2.2direct
PyPIbitsandbytes—direct
PyPIbitsandbytes0.44.0direct
PyPIbitsandbytes0.46.0direct
PyPIdadaptation3.2direct
PyPIdiffusers0.32.2direct
PyPIeasygui0.98.3direct
PyPIeinops0.7.0direct
PyPIfairscale0.4.13direct
PyPIftfy6.3.1direct
PyPIgradio6.17.3direct
PyPIgradio-client2.5.0direct
PyPIhuggingface-hub0.34.3direct
PyPIimagesize1.4.1direct
PyPIinvisible-watermark0.2.0direct
PyPIlion-pytorch0.2.3direct
PyPIlycoris-lora3.2.0.post2direct
PyPInumpy—direct
PyPInumpy1.26.4direct
PyPIomegaconf2.3.0direct
PyPIonnx1.17.0direct
PyPIonnxruntime-gpu1.19.2direct
PyPIopen-clip-torch2.32.0direct
PyPIopencv-python4.10.0.84direct
PyPIpip25.1.1direct
PyPIprodigy-plus-schedule-free1.9.2direct
PyPIprodigyopt1.1.2direct
PyPIprotobuf4.25.8direct
PyPIpy-cpuinfo—direct
PyPIpy-cpuinfo9.0.0direct
PyPIpytorch-optimizer3.10.0direct
PyPIrich—direct
PyPIrich14.0.0direct
PyPIsafetensors0.4.5direct
PyPIschedulefree1.4direct
PyPIscipy1.11.4direct
PyPIsentencepiece0.2.1direct
PyPItensorboard—direct
PyPItensorboard2.14.1direct
PyPItensorboard2.15.2direct
PyPItensorboard2.16.2direct
PyPItensorboard2.19.0direct
PyPItensorflow—direct
PyPItensorflow2.14.0direct
PyPItensorflow2.15.0.post1direct
PyPItensorflow2.15.1direct
PyPItensorflow2.19.0direct
PyPItensorflow-io-gcs-filesystem0.31.0direct
PyPItensorflow-io-gcs-filesystem0.37.1direct
PyPItimm1.0.15direct
PyPItk0.1.0direct
PyPItoml0.10.2direct
PyPItorch2.5.0+cu124direct
PyPItorch2.7.0direct
PyPItorch2.7.0+cu128direct
PyPItorch2.7.1+rocm6.3direct
PyPItorch2.7.1+xpudirect
PyPItorch2.8.0.*direct
PyPItorchvision0.20.0+cu124direct
PyPItorchvision0.22.*direct
PyPItorchvision0.22.0direct
PyPItorchvision0.22.0+cu128direct
PyPItorchvision0.22.1+rocm6.3direct
PyPItorchvision0.22.1+xpudirect
PyPItransformers4.54.1direct
PyPItriton3.3.0direct
PyPIvoluptuous0.15.2direct
PyPIwandb0.18.0direct
PyPIxformers—direct
PyPIxformers0.0.28.post2direct
PyPIxformers0.0.30direct
PyPIabsl-py2.3.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIantlr4-python3-runtime4.9.3indirect
PyPIanyio4.9.0indirect
PyPIastunparse1.6.3indirect
PyPIattrs25.3.0indirect
PyPIblack26.5.1indirect
PyPIbrotli1.2.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.6.15indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.2indirect
PyPIclick8.2.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoloredlogs15.0.1indirect
PyPIdocker-pycreds0.4.0indirect
PyPIentrypoints0.4indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.0indirect
PyPIfastapi0.139.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.18.0indirect
PyPIflatbuffers25.2.10indirect
PyPIfsspec2025.5.1indirect
PyPIgast0.6.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgitpython3.1.44indirect
PyPIgoogle-pasta0.2.0indirect
PyPIgroovy0.1.2indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.73.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh5py3.14.0indirect
PyPIhf-gradio0.4.1indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.5.1indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhumanfriendly10.0indirect
PyPIidna3.10indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.24.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.4.1indirect
PyPIkeras3.10.0indirect
PyPIlibclang18.1.1indirect
PyPImarkdown3.8.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py3.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.2indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPIml-dtypes0.5.1indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInamex0.1.0indirect
PyPInetworkx3.4.2indirect
PyPInetworkx3.5indirect
PyPInvidia-cublas-cu1212.8.3.14indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-cupti-cu1212.8.57indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu1212.8.61indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-runtime-cu1212.8.57indirect
PyPInvidia-cudnn-cu129.7.1.26indirect
PyPInvidia-cufft-cu1211.3.3.41indirect
PyPInvidia-cufile-cu121.13.0.11indirect
PyPInvidia-curand-cu1210.3.9.55indirect
PyPInvidia-cusolver-cu1211.7.2.55indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparse-cu1212.5.7.53indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparselt-cu120.6.3indirect
PyPInvidia-nccl-cu122.26.2indirect
PyPInvidia-nvjitlink-cu1212.8.61indirect
PyPInvidia-nvtx-cu1212.8.55indirect
PyPIonnxruntime1.17.1indirect
PyPIonnxruntime-openvino1.22.0indirect
PyPIonnxruntime-rocm1.21.0indirect
PyPIopt-einsum3.4.0indirect
PyPIoptree0.16.0indirect
PyPIorjson3.10.18indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpillow11.2.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.3.8indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpsutil7.0.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.11.7indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.33.2indirect
PyPIpydub0.25.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpyreadline33.5.4indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.20indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpytz2025.2indirect
PyPIpywavelets1.8.0indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.2indirect
PyPIreferencing0.36.2indirect
PyPIregex2024.11.6indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.4indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.25.1indirect
PyPIsafehttpx0.1.7indirect
PyPIsemantic-version2.10.0indirect
PyPIsentry-sdk2.30.0indirect
PyPIsetproctitle1.3.6indirect
PyPIsetuptools80.9.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.2indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPItensorboard-data-server0.7.2indirect
PyPItensorflow-macos—indirect
PyPItensorflow-metal—indirect
PyPItensorflow-rocm2.14.0.600indirect
PyPItensorflow-rocm2.16.2indirect
PyPItensorrt—indirect
PyPItermcolor3.1.0indirect
PyPItokenizers0.21.4indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomlkit0.13.3indirect
PyPItoolz1.0.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.1indirect
PyPItyper0.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.14.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2025.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.5.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.34.3indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.2.13indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.3indirect
PyPIwheel—indirect
PyPIwheel0.45.1indirect
PyPIwrapt1.17.2indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
Dependency advisories 26

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 190 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 26 carry known advisories, of which 11 are direct. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
onnx1.17.0directcritical171.22.0
torch2.5.0+cu124directcritical222.13.0
transformers4.54.1directcritical185.10.0
anyio4.9.0indirectcritical44.14.2
gitpython3.1.44indirectcritical593.1.62
keras3.10.0indirectcritical303.15.0
pillow11.2.1indirectcritical3812.3.0
accelerate1.8.1directhigh2—
diffusers0.32.2directhigh50.38.0
pip25.1.1directhigh1226.2.0
protobuf4.25.8directhigh26.33.5
torch2.7.0directhigh152.13.0
torch2.7.0+cu128directhigh152.13.0
torch2.7.1+rocm6.3directhigh102.13.0
torch2.7.1+xpudirecthigh102.13.0
fsspec2025.5.1indirecthigh22026.6.0
orjson3.10.18indirecthigh23.11.6
python-multipart0.0.20indirecthigh140.0.31
urllib32.5.0indirecthigh122.8.0
wheel0.45.1indirecthigh20.46.2
filelock3.18.0indirectmoderate43.20.3
idna3.10indirectmoderate23.15
requests2.32.4indirectmoderate22.33.0
setuptools80.9.0indirectmoderate283.0.0
werkzeug3.1.3indirectmoderate83.1.9
pygments2.19.2indirectlow22.20.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.