Public recordGood
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 12:42 UTC
ciotlosm / lovelace-thermostat-dark-card
🌡 Thermostat card with a round and black feel to it
ciotlosm/lovelace-thermostat-dark-card holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (72/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (40/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
67
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
MariusPersonal account
101 followers7 public repossince May 2014
This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
70
Development activity
60Moderate
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 4 days ago |
| 4.2/36 | Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits |
| 14.2/18 | Commit volume — 37 commits in the last year |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 37 |
| human_commit_share | — |
| days_since_last_push | 4 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 6 |
Release discipline
84Excellent
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 11 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 4 days ago |
| 12.6/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~228.7 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 11 |
| latest_release_tag | v2.6.1 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 4 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 228.7 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
72
Popularity & adoption
74Good
How it's scored
| 46.6/60 | Stars — 743 stars |
| 18.9/25 | Forks — 185 forks |
| 8.8/15 | Watchers — 39 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 185 |
| stars | 743 |
| watchers | 39 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
70Good
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (MIT) |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | — |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
58
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
32At Risk
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 6.7/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 70% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 23 contributors |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 23 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.701 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
92Excellent
How it's scored
| 41.7/42 | Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed |
| 24.6/30 | PR acceptance — 165/201 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 165 |
| open_issues | 1 |
| closed_issues | 159 |
| prs_merged_7d | — |
| prs_decided_7d | — |
| prs_merged_30d | — |
| prs_decided_30d | — |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.994 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 36 |
| first_time_authors_30d | — |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | — |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
54Moderate
How it's scored
| 10/30 | Ownership backing — personal (user) account |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts |
| 14.4/25 | Owner reach — 101 followers of ciotlosm |
| 18.6/25 | Track record — 7 public repos, account ~12 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 101 |
| owner_type | User |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | ciotlosm |
| public_repos | 7 |
| account_age_days | 4,431 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
60
Engineering practices
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 2 workflow(s) |
| 0/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — biome.json |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | no |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
75Good
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 0/15 | Documentation / homepage site |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 5 topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | home-assistant, lovelace, custom-cards, thermostat, hacs |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | — |
| docs_site | — |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
50
Security posture
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/30 | Security policy (SECURITY.md) |
| 25/25 | Dependabot config |
| 25/25 | Dependency lockfiles — package-lock.json |
| 0/20 | CodeQL workflow |
Inputs used
| source | file_signals |
| lockfiles | package-lock.json |
| manifests | package.json |
| has_codeql_workflow | no |
| has_security_policy | no |
| has_dependabot_config | yes |
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
40
Agent context & guidance
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 0/40 | Legible commit history — no data |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | — |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
| 0/18 | One-command bootstrap |
| 0/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — biome.json |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — tsconfig.json |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — lockfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no data |
| 5/8 | Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | no |
| lockfiles | package-lock.json |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | tsconfig.json |
| agent_commit_share | — |
| toolchain_manifests | — |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
Code legibility for models
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed) |
| 55/55 | Manageable file sizes — 0/16 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | TypeScript |
| largest_source_bytes | 31,260 |
| source_files_sampled | 16 |
| oversized_source_files | 0 |
Key facts
743GitHub stars
23contributors
37commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
11releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Could not fetch npm package 'thermostat-dark-card' from its registry
- OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks
More detail
Direct dependencies 2
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | home-assistant-js-websocket | ^9.6.0 | package.json |
| npm | lit | ^3.3.2 | package.json |
All dependencies 94
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 92 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | home-assistant-js-websocket | 9.6.0 | direct |
| npm | lit | 3.3.3 | direct |
| npm | @biomejs/biome | 2.5.3 | indirect |
| npm | @biomejs/cli-darwin-arm64 | 2.5.3 | indirect |
| npm | @biomejs/cli-darwin-x64 | 2.5.3 | indirect |
| npm | @biomejs/cli-linux-arm64 | 2.5.3 | indirect |
| npm | @biomejs/cli-linux-arm64-musl | 2.5.3 | indirect |
| npm | @biomejs/cli-linux-x64 | 2.5.3 | indirect |
| npm | @biomejs/cli-linux-x64-musl | 2.5.3 | indirect |
| npm | @biomejs/cli-win32-arm64 | 2.5.3 | indirect |
| npm | @biomejs/cli-win32-x64 | 2.5.3 | indirect |
| npm | @emnapi/core | 1.11.1 | indirect |
| npm | @emnapi/runtime | 1.11.1 | indirect |
| npm | @emnapi/wasi-threads | 1.2.2 | indirect |
| npm | @jridgewell/gen-mapping | 0.3.13 | indirect |
| npm | @jridgewell/resolve-uri | 3.1.2 | indirect |
| npm | @jridgewell/source-map | 0.3.11 | indirect |
| npm | @jridgewell/sourcemap-codec | 1.5.5 | indirect |
| npm | @jridgewell/trace-mapping | 0.3.31 | indirect |
| npm | @lit-labs/ssr-dom-shim | 1.6.0 | indirect |
| npm | @lit/reactive-element | 2.1.2 | indirect |
| npm | @napi-rs/wasm-runtime | 1.1.6 | indirect |
| npm | @oxc-project/types | 0.139.0 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-android-arm64 | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64 | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-darwin-x64 | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64 | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64 | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/pluginutils | 1.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | @tybys/wasm-util | 0.10.3 | indirect |
| npm | @types/trusted-types | 2.0.7 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-aix-ppc64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-darwin-arm64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-darwin-x64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-freebsd-x64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-linux-arm | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-linux-arm64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-linux-loong64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-linux-ppc64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-linux-riscv64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-linux-s390x | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-linux-x64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-netbsd-x64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-openbsd-x64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-sunos-x64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-win32-arm64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript/typescript-win32-x64 | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | acorn | 8.17.0 | indirect |
| npm | buffer-from | 1.1.2 | indirect |
| npm | commander | 2.20.3 | indirect |
| npm | detect-libc | 2.1.2 | indirect |
| npm | fdir | 6.5.0 | indirect |
| npm | fsevents | 2.3.3 | indirect |
| npm | lightningcss | 1.32.0 | indirect |
| npm | lightningcss-android-arm64 | 1.32.0 | indirect |
| npm | lightningcss-darwin-arm64 | 1.32.0 | indirect |
| npm | lightningcss-darwin-x64 | 1.32.0 | indirect |
| npm | lightningcss-freebsd-x64 | 1.32.0 | indirect |
| npm | lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf | 1.32.0 | indirect |
| npm | lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu | 1.32.0 | indirect |
| npm | lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl | 1.32.0 | indirect |
| npm | lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu | 1.32.0 | indirect |
| npm | lightningcss-linux-x64-musl | 1.32.0 | indirect |
| npm | lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc | 1.32.0 | indirect |
| npm | lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc | 1.32.0 | indirect |
| npm | lit-element | 4.2.2 | indirect |
| npm | lit-html | 3.3.3 | indirect |
| npm | nanoid | 3.3.15 | indirect |
| npm | picocolors | 1.1.1 | indirect |
| npm | picomatch | 4.0.5 | indirect |
| npm | postcss | 8.5.16 | indirect |
| npm | rolldown | 1.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | source-map | 0.6.1 | indirect |
| npm | source-map-js | 1.2.1 | indirect |
| npm | source-map-support | 0.5.21 | indirect |
| npm | terser | 5.49.0 | indirect |
| npm | tinyglobby | 0.2.17 | indirect |
| npm | tslib | 2.8.1 | indirect |
| npm | typescript | 7.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | vite | 8.1.4 | indirect |
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.