Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-05 04:07 UTC

claude-code-best / claude-code

原汁原昧 Claude Code 可运行,可构建, 可调试版; 生产级工程化, 企业级可靠性; 安全无毒, 内存泄露修复

TypeScriptNo license detected★ 21,821 stars⑂ 16,482 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

claude-code-best/claude-code holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Security (57/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

claude-code-bestPersonal account
430 followers16 public repossince Mar 2026

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmclaude-code-best2.8.42,6077215 days agoclaudeanthropiccliaicoding-assistantterminalrepl

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 826 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year826
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year18

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 52 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 15 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~4.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count52
latest_release_tagv2.8.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release15
mean_days_between_releases4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 21,821 stars
25/25Forks — 16,482 forks
11.8/15Watchers — 136 watchers
Inputs used
forks16,482
stars21,821
watchers136
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges7
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
45.6/80Monthly downloads — 2,607 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesclaude-code-best
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads2,607
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 83% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 47 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled47
top_contributor_share0.831
How it's scored
40.9/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
16.5/30PR acceptance — 180/327 decided PRs merged
9.9/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 13/17 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 12/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs180
open_issues25
closed_issues975
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d6
prs_merged_30d19
prs_decided_30d24
issue_closed_ratio0.975
closed_unmerged_prs147
first_time_authors_30d10
first_time_prs_merged_30d13
first_time_prs_decided_30d17
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
18.9/25Owner reach — 430 followers of claude-code-best
9.6/25Track record — 16 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers430
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginclaude-code-best
public_repos16
account_age_days126
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 15 days ago
20/20Version history — 72 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesclaude-code-best
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish15

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — biome.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://ccb.agent-aura.top/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://ccb.agent-aura.top/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
3/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 12/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
11.7/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: @hono/node-server 1.19.17 (moderate 5.9), hono 4.12.33 (moderate 5.3)
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages2
assessed_packages104
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitymoderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the npm:claude-code-best@2.8.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 104 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 96 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.96
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes29,459
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — biome.json
11/11Static type checking — packages/@ant/claude-for-chrome-mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/@ant/computer-use-input/tsconfig.json, packages/@ant/computer-use-mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/@ant/computer-use-swift/tsconfig.json, packages/@ant/ink/tsconfig.json, packages/@ant/model-provider/tsconfig.json, packages/acp-link/tsconfig.json, packages/agent-tools/tsconfig.json, packages/audio-capture-napi/tsconfig.json, packages/builtin-tools/tsconfig.json, packages/cloud-artifacts/tsconfig.json, packages/color-diff-napi/tsconfig.json, packages/image-processor-napi/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-client/tsconfig.json, packages/modifiers-napi/tsconfig.json, packages/remote-control-server/tsconfig.json, packages/remote-control-server/web/tsconfig.json, packages/tsconfig.json, packages/url-handler-napi/tsconfig.json, packages/weixin/tsconfig.json, packages/workflow-engine/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 12 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/@ant/claude-for-chrome-mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/@ant/computer-use-input/tsconfig.json, packages/@ant/computer-use-mcp/tsconfig.json, packages/@ant/computer-use-swift/tsconfig.json, packages/@ant/ink/tsconfig.json, packages/@ant/model-provider/tsconfig.json, packages/acp-link/tsconfig.json, packages/agent-tools/tsconfig.json, packages/audio-capture-napi/tsconfig.json, packages/builtin-tools/tsconfig.json, packages/cloud-artifacts/tsconfig.json, packages/color-diff-napi/tsconfig.json, packages/image-processor-napi/tsconfig.json, packages/mcp-client/tsconfig.json, packages/modifiers-napi/tsconfig.json, packages/remote-control-server/tsconfig.json, packages/remote-control-server/web/tsconfig.json, packages/tsconfig.json, packages/url-handler-napi/tsconfig.json, packages/weixin/tsconfig.json, packages/workflow-engine/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.12
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 43/3,265 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes299,612
source_files_sampled3,265
oversized_source_files43
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files

Key facts

21,821GitHub stars
47contributors
826commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
52releases
1bus factor
25open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 15 authors (cap 12)
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 16,482 ⇿
0Stars
16,482Forks
20Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

15,00015,50016,00016,50016,482242026-052026-062026-08
Major 0Minor 4Patch 16
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-05 04:06 UTC

4Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 12/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
7Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
1SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 1
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@agentclientprotocol/sdk^0.19.0package.json
npm@claude-code-best/mcp-chrome-bridge^3.0.1package.json
npmhighlight.js^11.11.1package.json
npmws^8.20.0package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 2

Installing npm:claude-code-best@2.8.4 pulls in 104 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
@hono/node-server1.19.17indirectmoderate12.0.5
hono4.12.33indirectmoderate14.12.34

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.