Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-28 09:35 UTC

cogeotiff / rio-tiler

User friendly Rasterio plugin to read raster datasets.

PythonBSD-3-Clause★ 595 stars⑂ 122 forkssince Oct 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#satellite#cog#cogeotiff#maptile#raster-processing#mercator#tile#slippy-map#gdal#rasterio#raster

cogeotiff/rio-tiler holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (67/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

cogeotiffOrganization
160 followers14 public repossince Jun 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIrio-tiler9.4.6376,96422911 days agocogeocloud-optimized-geotiffstacrasterioslippy-map

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

90Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
25.6/36Commit cadence — 37/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 202 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year202
human_commit_share0.66
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year37

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 59 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~12.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count59
latest_release_tag9.4.7
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases12.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

72Good
How it's scored
45/60Stars — 595 stars
17.4/25Forks — 122 forks
9.6/15Watchers — 55 watchers
Inputs used
forks122
stars595
watchers55
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

93Exceptional
How it's scored
74.4/80Monthly downloads — 376,964 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesrio-tiler
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads376,964
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 86% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 37 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 16 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled37
top_contributor_share0.86

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good
How it's scored
39.8/42Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
25.8/30PR acceptance — 518/602 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs518
open_issues18
closed_issues322
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.947
closed_unmerged_prs84
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1

Ownership & stewardship

66Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
15.9/25Owner reach — 160 followers of cogeotiff
20.6/25Track record — 14 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers160
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logincogeotiff
public_repos14
account_age_days3,033

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 11 days ago
20/20Version history — 229 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesrio-tiler
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish11

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.isort])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://cogeotiff.github.io/rio-tiler/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 11 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicssatellite, cog, cogeotiff, maptile, raster-processing, mercator, tile, slippy-map, gdal, rasterio, raster
has_wikino
homepagehttps://cogeotiff.github.io/rio-tiler/
docs_sitehttps://cogeotiff.github.io/rio-tiler/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

62Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 16 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages49
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:rio-tiler@9.4.6 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 49 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 50 of 66 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.758
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.isort])
11/11Static type checking — rio_tiler/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 34 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsrio_tiler/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.34

Code legibility for models

80Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (rio_tiler/py.typed)
53.3/55Manageable file sizes — 2/65 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes77,364
source_files_sampled65
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

595GitHub stars
37contributors
202commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
59releases
1bus factor
18open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 122 ⇿
0Stars
122Forks
55Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012512132017-102022-032026-09
Major 3Minor 13Patch 29

Each point covers 9 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-28 09:34 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 16 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIattrs—pyproject.toml
PyPIcachetools—pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx2—pyproject.toml
PyPInumexpr—pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy—pyproject.toml
PyPImorecantile>=5.0,<8.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic~=2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpystac>=1.9,<2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrasterio>=1.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcolor-operations—pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions>=4.10.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 263

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 250 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIattrs26.1.0direct
PyPIcachetools7.1.8direct
PyPIcolor-operations0.4.0direct
PyPIhttpx22.13.0direct
PyPImorecantile7.0.3direct
PyPInumexpr2.14.2direct
PyPInumpy2.4.6direct
PyPInumpy2.5.1direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.5direct
PyPIpystac1.15.2direct
PyPIrasterio1.4.4direct
PyPIrasterio1.5.0direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0direct
PyPIaffine2.4.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.5indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIappnope0.1.4indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi25.1.0indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi-bindings25.1.0indirect
PyPIarrow1.4.0indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.2indirect
PyPIasync-geotiff0.5.1indirect
PyPIasync-lru2.3.0indirect
PyPIasync-tiff0.7.2indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbackports-zstd1.6.0indirect
PyPIbackrefs8.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0indirect
PyPIbleach6.4.0indirect
PyPIboto31.43.94indirect
PyPIbotocore1.43.99indirect
PyPIbranca0.8.2indirect
PyPIcairocffi1.7.1indirect
PyPIcairosvg2.9.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIclick-plugins1.1.1.2indirect
PyPIcligj0.7.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.2indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIcssselect20.9.0indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.21indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdiskcache5.6.3indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdonfig0.8.1.post1indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfastapi0.140.9indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.22.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.0indirect
PyPIfonttools4.63.0indirect
PyPIfqdn1.5.1indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-crc32c1.8.0indirect
PyPIgriffe-inherited-docstrings1.1.3indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.1.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh5netcdf1.8.1indirect
PyPIh5py3.16.0indirect
PyPIhatch1.18.0indirect
PyPIhatchling1.31.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.13.0indirect
PyPIhttptools0.8.0indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIhyperlink21.0.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipykernel7.3.0indirect
PyPIipyleaflet0.20.0indirect
PyPIipython9.17.1indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIipywidgets8.1.8indirect
PyPIisoduration20.11.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.20.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjson50.15.0indirect
PyPIjsonpointer3.1.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter1.1.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-builder1.1.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-console6.6.3indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-events0.12.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-leaflet0.20.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-lsp2.3.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-server2.20.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-server-terminals0.5.4indirect
PyPIjupyterlab4.6.2indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-pygments0.3.0indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-server2.28.0indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-widgets3.0.16indirect
PyPIjupytext1.19.5indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.5.0indirect
PyPIlark1.3.1indirect
PyPIloguru0.7.3indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.11.2indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.2indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImike2.2.0indirect
PyPImistune3.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-autorefs1.4.4indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.2indirect
PyPImkdocs-jupyter0.26.3indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.7.7indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocstrings1.0.6indirect
PyPImkdocstrings-python2.0.5indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPInbclient0.11.0indirect
PyPInbconvert7.17.1indirect
PyPInbformat5.10.4indirect
PyPInest-asyncio21.7.2indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInotebook7.6.1indirect
PyPInotebook-shim0.2.4indirect
PyPInumcodecs0.16.5indirect
PyPIobspec0.1.0indirect
PyPIobstore0.11.1indirect
PyPIoverrides7.7.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpandas3.0.5indirect
PyPIpandocfilters1.5.1indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.2indirect
PyPIprometheus-client0.26.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.53indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpy-cpuinfo210.1.1indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.14.2indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpyinstrument5.1.3indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions11.0.1indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpyproj3.7.2indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpystac-core1.15.2indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-classification2.0.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-datacube2.2.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-eo1.1.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-file2.1.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-grid1.1.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-item-assets1.0.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-label1.0.1indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-mgrs1.0.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-mlm1.4.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-pointcloud1.0.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-projection2.0.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-raster1.1.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-render2.0.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-sar1.0.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-sat1.0.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-scientific1.0.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-storage2.0.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-table1.2.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-timestamps1.1.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-version1.2.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-view1.0.0indirect
PyPIpystac-ext-xarray-assets1.0.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-async-benchmark0.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-benchmark5.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.5.0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpython-json-logger4.1.0indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpywinpty3.0.5indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag1.1indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.1.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrfc3339-validator0.1.4indirect
PyPIrfc3986-validator0.1.1indirect
PyPIrfc3987-syntax1.1.0indirect
PyPIrich15.0.0indirect
PyPIrioxarray0.19.0indirect
PyPIrioxarray0.23.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.19.2indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsend2trash2.1.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9.1indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPIterminado0.18.1indirect
PyPItilebench0.19.0indirect
PyPItinycss21.5.1indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.15.1indirect
PyPItornado6.5.8indirect
PyPItraitlets5.15.1indirect
PyPItraittypes0.2.3indirect
PyPItrove-classifiers2026.6.1.19indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIuri-template1.3.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuserpath1.9.2indirect
PyPIuv0.11.33indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.51.0indirect
PyPIuvloop0.22.1indirect
PyPIverspec0.1.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.0indirect
PyPIvsifile0.6.0indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.2.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
PyPIwebcolors25.10.0indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwebsocket-client1.9.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.1.1indirect
PyPIwidgetsnbextension4.0.15indirect
PyPIwin32-setctime1.2.0indirect
PyPIxarray2026.7.0indirect
PyPIxyzservices2026.3.0indirect
PyPIzarr3.1.6indirect
PyPIzarr3.2.1indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:rio-tiler@9.4.6 pulls in 49 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with cogeotiff/rio-tiler. Read them side by side →

96developmentseed/titilerBuild your own Raster dynamic map tile servicesExceptional88corteva/rioxarraygeospatial xarray extension powered by rasterioExcellent86jgrss/geowombatGeoWombat: Utilities for geospatial dataExcellent83mapchete/mapcheteTile-based geodata processing using rasterio & FionaExcellent96stac-utils/pystacPython library for working with any SpatioTemporal Asset Catalog (STAC)Exceptional93rasterio/rasterioRasterio reads and writes geospatial raster datasetsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.