Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 05:31 UTC

cottman99 / ads-agent-bridge

Let AI agents safely understand and operate the exact Keysight ADS context you selected.

PythonMIT★ 4 stars⑂ 1 forksince Aug 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#ai-agent#eda#keysight-ads#rf-engineering

cottman99/ads-agent-bridge holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (71/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (39/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

PhiChiPersonal account
9 followers18 public repossince Mar 2020School of Microelectronics

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIads-agent-bridge0.1.0a496923349 days agoadsautomationedakeysightrf

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

54Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
15.5/18Commit volume — 52 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year52
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year3

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 33 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 49 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count33
latest_release_tagv0.1.0a49
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release49
mean_days_between_releases0.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

8Critical
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars4
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

47Weak
How it's scored
37.9/80Monthly downloads — 692 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesads-agent-bridge
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads692
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

75Good
How it's scored
35/42Issue resolution — 83% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 46/46 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs46
open_issues1
closed_issues5
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.833
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

48Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
7.2/25Owner reach — 9 followers of cottman99
21.3/25Track record — 18 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers9
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logincottman99
public_repos18
account_age_days2,403
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 49 days ago
20/20Version history — 33 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesads-agent-bridge
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish49

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

71Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agent, eda, keysight-ads, rf-engineering
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 22 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.1

Dependency advisories

77Good
How it's scored
12/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: pillow 12.3.0 (high 8.2)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories9
affected_packages1
assessed_packages9
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the pypi:ads-agent-bridge@0.1.0a49 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 9 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 43 of 52 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.827
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,402

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

37Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 52
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 1/84 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes67,139
source_files_sampled84
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

4GitHub stars
1contributors
52commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
33releases
1bus factor
1open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 05:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities22 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIbeautifulsoup4>=4.12,<5pyproject.toml
PyPIeda-bridge-runtime>=0.1.0a39,<0.2pyproject.toml
PyPIhtml2text>=2024.2.26,<2027pyproject.toml
PyPIPillow>=11.2.1,<13pyproject.toml
PyPIplatformdirs>=4,<5pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-xlib>=0.33,<1pyproject.toml
All dependencies 118

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 106 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIbeautifulsoup4—direct
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0direct
PyPIeda-bridge-runtime—direct
PyPIeda-bridge-runtime0.1.0a39direct
PyPIhtml2text—direct
PyPIhtml2text2025.4.15direct
PyPIpillow—direct
PyPIpillow12.3.0direct
PyPIplatformdirs—direct
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.5direct
PyPIpython-xlib—direct
PyPIpython-xlib0.33direct
npm@hono/node-server2.1.1indirect
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk1.30.0indirect
npmaccepts2.0.0indirect
npmajv8.20.0indirect
npmajv-formats3.0.1indirect
npmbody-parser2.3.0indirect
npmbytes3.1.2indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmcontent-disposition1.1.0indirect
npmcontent-type1.0.5indirect
npmcontent-type2.1.0indirect
npmcookie0.7.2indirect
npmcookie-signature1.2.2indirect
npmcors2.8.6indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdepd2.0.0indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmee-first1.1.1indirect
npmencodeurl2.0.0indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmescape-html1.0.3indirect
npmetag1.8.1indirect
npmeventsource3.0.7indirect
npmeventsource-parser3.1.1indirect
npmexpress5.2.1indirect
npmexpress-rate-limit8.7.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.6indirect
npmfinalhandler2.1.1indirect
npmforwarded0.2.0indirect
npmfresh2.0.0indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhono4.13.5indirect
npmhttp-errors2.0.1indirect
npmiconv-lite0.7.3indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmip-address10.7.0indirect
npmipaddr.js1.9.1indirect
npmis-promise4.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjose6.2.10indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema-typed8.0.2indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmedia-typer1.1.1indirect
npmmerge-descriptors2.0.0indirect
npmmime-db1.54.0indirect
npmmime-types3.0.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnegotiator1.1.0indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmon-finished2.4.1indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmparseurl1.3.3indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-to-regexp8.4.2indirect
npmpkce-challenge5.0.1indirect
npmproxy-addr2.0.7indirect
npmqs6.16.0indirect
npmrange-parser1.3.0indirect
npmraw-body3.0.2indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmrouter2.2.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsend1.2.1indirect
npmserve-static2.2.1indirect
npmsetprototypeof1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmside-channel1.1.1indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmstatuses2.0.2indirect
npmtoidentifier1.0.1indirect
npmtype-is2.1.0indirect
npmunpipe1.0.0indirect
npmvary1.1.2indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmzod4.5.4indirect
npmzod-to-json-schema3.25.2indirect
PyPIads-agent-bridge0.1.0a49indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIhatchling—indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.3indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.9.2indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing pypi:ads-agent-bridge@0.1.0a49 pulls in 9 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
pillow12.3.0directhigh913.0.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with cottman99/ads-agent-bridge. Read them side by side →

96kirodotdev/KiroCrewA persistent workspace for development work that self-improves and continues beyond one session.Exceptional93browser-use/browser-harnessBrowser Harness | Self-healing harness that enables LLMs to complete any task.Exceptional92oaslananka/kicad-mcp-proMCP server for KiCad, connecting AI agents to schematic and PCB workflows, ERC/DRC validation, DFM checks, BOM analysis, and manufacturing preparation—with controlled edits and human-gated release workflows.Excellent91seleniumbase/SeleniumBase📊 APIs for web automation, testing, and bypassing bot-detection.Excellent92pinchtab/pinchtabHigh-performance browser automation bridge and multi-instance orchestrator with advanced stealth injection and real-time dashboard.Excellent100psf/blackThe uncompromising Python code formatterExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.