Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 02:02 UTC

cve-search / vulnerability-lookup

Vulnerability-Lookup facilitates quick correlation of vulnerabilities from various sources, independent of vulnerability IDs, and streamlines the management of Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure (CVD).

Python · HTMLAGPL-3.0★ 547 stars⑂ 85 forkssince Nov 2022View on GitHub ↗
#cvd#cvd-policy#cve#vulnerability-databases#vulnerability-lookup

cve-search/vulnerability-lookup holds a health index of 95 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (100/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (58/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

95
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

95
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Vulnerability-LookupOrganization
58 followers23 public repossince Jan 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

99Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
34.6/36Commit cadence — 50/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,304 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,304
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year50

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 49 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~12.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count49
latest_release_tagv5.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases12.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

67Good
How it's scored
44.4/60Stars — 547 stars
16/25Forks — 85 forks
6.7/15Watchers — 17 watchers
Inputs used
forks85
stars547
watchers17
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 82% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 27 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 34 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled27
top_contributor_share0.822

Issue & PR responsiveness

73Good
How it's scored
33.8/42Issue resolution — 80% of issues closed
25.4/30PR acceptance — 134/158 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs134
open_issues62
closed_issues254
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.804
closed_unmerged_prs24
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

70Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
12.7/25Owner reach — 58 followers of vulnerability-lookup
13/25Track record — 23 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers58
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginvulnerability-lookup
public_repos23
account_age_days540
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

100Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.vulnerability-lookup.org
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscvd, cvd-policy, cve, vulnerability-databases, vulnerability-lookup
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.vulnerability-lookup.org
docs_sitehttps://www.vulnerability-lookup.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

75Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

75Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 34 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

84Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,119
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

86Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — mypy.ini
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespoetry.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsmypy.ini
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

80Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (mypy.ini)
52.9/55Manageable file sizes — 16/423 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes527,216
source_files_sampled423
oversized_source_files16

Machine-readable interfaces

50Moderate
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — docs/_static/files/swagger.json
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesdocs/_static/files/swagger.json
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

547GitHub stars
27contributors
1,304commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
49releases
1bus factor
62open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch pypi package 'vulnerabilitylookup' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.5 / 10
7.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 02:02 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 4/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 34 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 43
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIredis(>=7.1.0,<7.2.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIgunicorn(>=23.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIflask-restx(>=1.3.2)pyproject.toml
PyPIwerkzeug(>=3.1.5)pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests(>=2.32.5)pyproject.toml
PyPIgitpython(>=3.1.43)pyproject.toml
PyPIbootstrap-flask(>=2.4.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml(>=6.0.2)pyproject.toml
PyPIorjson(>=3.10.7)pyproject.toml
PyPIfeedgen(>=1.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy(>=2.0.45)pyproject.toml
PyPIflask-principal(>=0.4.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIflask-login(>=0.6.3)pyproject.toml
PyPIflask-sqlalchemy(>=3.1.1)pyproject.toml
PyPIflask-migrate(>=4.0.7)pyproject.toml
PyPIvalidate-email(>=1.3)pyproject.toml
PyPIflask-wtf(>=1.2.1)pyproject.toml
PyPIwtforms(>=3.1.2)pyproject.toml
PyPIemail-validator(>=2.2.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIflask-paginate(>=2024.4.12)pyproject.toml
PyPIpyotp(>=2.9.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIqrcode(>=7.4.2)pyproject.toml
PyPIpyvariot(>=0.2.0)pyproject.toml
PyPImarkdown(>=3.7)pyproject.toml
PyPIthe-big-username-blacklist(>=1.5.4)pyproject.toml
PyPIcvss(>=3.1)pyproject.toml
PyPIxmltodict(>=0.14.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIfeedparser(>=6.0.11)pyproject.toml
PyPIpycountry(>=24.6.1)pyproject.toml
PyPIpymispwarninglists(>=1.5)pyproject.toml
PyPIbleach(>=6.3.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy-schemadisplay(>=2.0,<3.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIbeautifulsoup4(>=4.11.2)pyproject.toml
PyPIgcve(>=0.11.0,<1.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIpylookyloo(>=1.31.1,<2.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIpytz(>=2025.2,<2026.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIflask-limiter(>=4.1.0,<5.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIpsycopg(>=3.3.2,<4.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPImeilisearch(>=0.40.0,<0.41.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIvalkey(>=6.1.1,<7.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPItomlkit(>=0.14.0,<0.15.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIflask-caching(>=2.3.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIflask-cors(>=6.0.0)pyproject.toml
All dependencies 183

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 43 direct and 140 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.15.0direct
PyPIbleach6.4.0direct
PyPIbootstrap-flask2.5.0direct
PyPIcvss3.6direct
PyPIemail-validator2.3.0direct
PyPIfeedgen1.0.0direct
PyPIfeedparser6.0.12direct
PyPIflask-caching2.4.1direct
PyPIflask-cors6.0.5direct
PyPIflask-limiter4.1.1direct
PyPIflask-login0.6.3direct
PyPIflask-migrate4.1.0direct
PyPIflask-paginate2024.4.12direct
PyPIflask-principal0.4.0direct
PyPIflask-restx1.3.2direct
PyPIflask-sqlalchemy3.1.1direct
PyPIflask-wtf1.3.0direct
PyPIgcve0.12.1direct
PyPIgitpython3.1.51direct
PyPIgunicorn26.0.0direct
PyPImarkdown3.10.2direct
PyPImeilisearch0.40.0direct
PyPIorjson3.11.9direct
PyPIpsycopg3.3.4direct
PyPIpycountry26.2.16direct
PyPIpylookyloo1.37.0direct
PyPIpymispwarninglists1.7.0direct
PyPIpyotp2.10.0direct
PyPIpytz2025.2direct
PyPIpyvariot0.2.2direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIqrcode8.2direct
PyPIredis7.1.1direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.51direct
PyPIsqlalchemy-schemadisplay2.0direct
PyPIthe-big-username-blacklist1.5.4direct
PyPItomlkit0.14.0direct
PyPIvalidate-email1.3direct
PyPIvalkey6.1.1direct
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.8direct
PyPIwtforms3.2.2direct
PyPIxmltodict1.0.4direct
PyPIaccessible-pygments0.0.5indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIalembic1.18.5indirect
PyPIaniso860110.0.1indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.2indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIblinker1.9.0indirect
PyPIcachelib0.14.0indirect
PyPIcamel-converter5.1.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.9indirect
PyPIclick8.4.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcryptography48.0.1indirect
PyPIdateparser1.4.1indirect
PyPIdecorator5.3.1indirect
PyPIdeepmerge2.1.0indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.7indirect
PyPIflask3.1.3indirect
PyPIgevent26.5.0indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.5.3indirect
PyPIhiredis3.4.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimagesize1.5.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources7.1.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipython8.39.0indirect
PyPIitsdangerous2.2.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.20.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIlibrt0.13.0indirect
PyPIlimits5.8.0indirect
PyPIlookyloo-models0.3.0indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.1indirect
PyPImako1.3.12indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.2indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImistune3.3.3indirect
PyPImypy1.20.2indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser—indirect
PyPImyst-parser5.1.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIordered-set4.1.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIparso0.8.7indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpicobox4.0.0indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit3.8.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIpsycopg-binary3.3.4indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpydata-sphinx-theme0.16.1indirect
PyPIpydot4.0.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpysocks1.7.1indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-env1.6.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.4.4indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpyvulnerabilitylookup2.19.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.7.10indirect
PyPIrich14.3.4indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py2026.6.3indirect
PyPIsetuptools83.0.0indirect
PyPIsgmllib3k1.0.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.3indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.1.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.4indirect
PyPIsphinx—indirect
PyPIsphinx9.0.4indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints—indirect
PyPIsphinx-book-theme—indirect
PyPIsphinx-book-theme1.2.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-mdinclude0.6.2indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-httpdomain2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-mermaid—indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-mermaid1.2.3indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-openapi—indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-openapi0.8.4indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPItraitlets5.15.1indirect
PyPItypes-cffi2.0.0.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-openpyxl3.1.5.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-pyopenssl24.1.0.20240722indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-redis4.6.0.20241004indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.33.0.20260712indirect
PyPItypes-setuptools83.0.0.20260706indirect
PyPItypes-xmltodict0.13.0.3indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPItzlocal5.4.4indirect
PyPIua-parser1.0.2indirect
PyPIua-parser-builtins202606indirect
PyPIua-parser-rs0.1.5indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.6.1indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwrapt2.2.2indirect
PyPIzope-event6.2indirect
PyPIzope-interface8.5indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with cve-search/vulnerability-lookup. Read them side by side →

87aboutcode-org/vulnerablecodeA free and open vulnerabilities database and the packages they impact. And the tools to aggregate and correlate these vulnerabilities. Sponsored by NLnet https://nlnet.nl/project/vulnerabilitydatabase/ for https://www.aboutcode.org/ Chat at https://gitter.im/aboutcode-org/vulnerablecode Docs at https://vulnerablecode.readthedocs.org/Excellent88l3montree-dev/devguardDevGuard Backend - Secure your Software Supply Chain - Attestation-based compliance as Code, manage your CVEs seamlessly, Integrate your Vulnerability Scanners, Security Framework Documentation made easy - OWASP Incubating ProjectExcellent87l3montree-dev/flawfixDevGuard Backend - Secure your Software Supply Chain - Attestation-based compliance as Code, manage your CVEs seamlessly, Integrate your Vulnerability Scanners, Security Framework Documentation made easy - OWASP Incubating ProjectExcellent94msaad00/agent-bomOpen security scanner and self-hosted control plane for AI, MCP, and cloud. One evidence model — run scans in your environment, centralize findings, govern in your VPC.Exceptional84owasp-dep-scan/dep-scanOWASP dep-scan is a next-generation security and risk audit tool based on known vulnerabilities, advisories, and license limitations for project dependencies. Both local repositories and container images are supported as the input, and the tool is ideal for integration.Excellent83infobyte/faradayOpen Source Vulnerability Management PlatformExcellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.