Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 20:15 UTC

danielhuppmann / pyam

an open-source Python package for IAM scenario analysis and visualization

PythonApache-2.0★ 0 stars⑂ 1 forksince Feb 2018forkView on GitHub ↗

danielhuppmann/pyam holds a health index of 44 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (68/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

44
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

44
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 46 is calibrated to 44 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Daniel HuppmannPersonal account
157 followers72 public repossince Jan 2016International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIpyam-iamc3.5.044,1294338 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

42Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 5 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence4/52 weeks with commits
9/18Commit volume9 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year9
human_commit_share0.94
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year4
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases1 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recencylatest release 2,155 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.8.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release2,155
mean_days_between_releases
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges12
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, readthedocs.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 66% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth31 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled31
top_contributor_share0.665
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
16.6/30PR acceptance16/29 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs16
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
15.8/25Owner reach157 followers of danielhuppmann
25/25Track record72 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers157
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logindanielhuppmann
public_repos72
account_age_days3,881
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 38 days ago
20/20Version history43 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespyam-iamc
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish38

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://pyam-iamc.readthedocs.io
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_sitehttps://pyam-iamc.readthedocs.io
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

43Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities81 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages90
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:pyam-iamc@3.5.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 90 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history91 of 94 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.968
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapdocs/Makefile, manuscripts/ORE/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance6 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespoetry.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocs/Makefile, manuscripts/ORE/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.06
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePython without a type-check config
54.3/55Manageable file sizes1/82 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes108,278
source_files_sampled82
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples, notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, notebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
31contributors
9commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.9 / 10
2.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 20:15 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities81 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIiam-units>=2020.4.21pyproject.toml
PyPIixmp4>=0.13.0pyproject.toml
PyPImatplotlib>=3.6.0pyproject.toml
PyPInumpy>=1.26.0pyproject.toml
PyPIopenpyxl>=3.1.2pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas>=2.1.2pyproject.toml
PyPIPint>=0.13pyproject.toml
PyPIPyYAML>=6.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIscipy>=1.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIseaborn>=0.11pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>2.27.1pyproject.toml
PyPIwquantiles>=0.6pyproject.toml
PyPIXlsxWriter>=3.0.3pyproject.toml
All dependencies 196

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 180 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIiam-units2025.10.13direct
PyPIixmp40.13.1direct
PyPImatplotlib3.10.7direct
PyPInumpy2.2.6direct
PyPInumpy2.3.4direct
PyPIopenpyxl3.1.5direct
PyPIpandas2.3.3direct
PyPIpint0.24.4direct
PyPIpint0.25direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIrequests2.32.5direct
PyPIscipy1.15.3direct
PyPIscipy1.16.3direct
PyPIseaborn0.13.2direct
PyPIwquantiles0.6direct
PyPIxlsxwriter3.2.9direct
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIalembic1.17.1indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.3indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.11.0indirect
PyPIappdirs1.4.4indirect
PyPIappnope0.1.4indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.0indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIautodocsumm0.2.14indirect
PyPIbabel2.17.0indirect
PyPIbackoff2.2.1indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.2indirect
PyPIbleach6.3.0indirect
PyPIboto31.40.63indirect
PyPIbotocore1.40.63indirect
PyPIcached-property2.0.1indirect
PyPIcachetools5.5.2indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.10.5indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIchardet5.2.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIclick8.3.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.2indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoverage6.5.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.11.0indirect
PyPIcoveralls3.3.1indirect
PyPIcoveralls4.0.1indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdataflows-tabulator1.54.3indirect
PyPIdatapackage1.15.4indirect
PyPIdateparser1.2.2indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.17indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdocopt0.6.2indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIet-xmlfile2.0.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.0indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfake-useragent2.2.0indirect
PyPIfastapi0.120.3indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.21.2indirect
PyPIflexcache0.3indirect
PyPIflexparser0.4indirect
PyPIfonttools4.60.1indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.2.4indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh24.3.0indirect
PyPIhpack4.1.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhyperframe6.1.0indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIijson3.4.0.post0indirect
PyPIimagesize1.4.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipykernel7.1.0indirect
PyPIipython8.37.0indirect
PyPIipython9.6.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIisodate0.7.2indirect
PyPIjedi0.19.2indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjmespath1.0.1indirect
PyPIjsonlines4.0.0indirect
PyPIjsonpointer3.0.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.25.1indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.6.3indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-pygments0.3.0indirect
PyPIkaleido0.2.1indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.4.9indirect
PyPIlinear-tsv1.1.0indirect
PyPImako1.3.10indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImistune3.1.4indirect
PyPImypy1.18.2indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInarwhals2.10.1indirect
PyPInbclient0.10.2indirect
PyPInbconvert7.16.6indirect
PyPInbformat5.10.4indirect
PyPInbsphinx0.9.6indirect
PyPInbsphinx0.9.7indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInumpydoc1.9.0indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpandera0.26.1indirect
PyPIpandocfilters1.5.1indirect
PyPIparso0.8.5indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpillow12.0.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.5.0indirect
PyPIplotly6.3.1indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpooch1.8.2indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIpsutil7.1.2indirect
PyPIpsycopg3.2.12indirect
PyPIpsycopg-binary3.2.12indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyarrow22.0.0indirect
PyPIpycparser2.23indirect
PyPIpydantic2.12.3indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.11.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.10.1indirect
PyPIpypandoc1.15indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.2.5indirect
PyPIpytest8.4.2indirect
PyPIpytest-cov5.0.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.0.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mpl0.17.0indirect
PyPIpython-calamine0.5.4indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.1indirect
PyPIpytz2025.2indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.1.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2025.10.23indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich14.2.0indirect
PyPIroman-numerals-py3.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.28.0indirect
PyPIruff0.14.3indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.14.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIshelved-cache0.3.1indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.0.1indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8indirect
PyPIsphinx8.1.3indirect
PyPIsphinx8.2.3indirect
PyPIsphinx-gallery0.19.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.44indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy-utils0.42.0indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIstarlette0.49.1indirect
PyPItableschema1.21.0indirect
PyPItabulate0.9.0indirect
PyPItinycss21.4.0indirect
PyPItoml0.10.2indirect
PyPItomli2.3.0indirect
PyPItornado6.5.2indirect
PyPItraitlets5.14.3indirect
PyPItreelib1.8.0indirect
PyPItypeguard4.4.4indirect
PyPItyper0.20.0indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspect0.9.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2025.2indirect
PyPItzlocal5.3.1indirect
PyPIunfccc-di-api4.0.4indirect
PyPIunicodecsv0.14.1indirect
PyPIurllib32.5.0indirect
PyPIwbdata1.1.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.2.14indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIxarray2025.10.1indirect
PyPIxarray2025.6.1indirect
PyPIxlrd2.0.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:pyam-iamc@3.5.0 pulls in 90 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.