Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 17:37 UTC

dannyota / onnxruntime

ONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training accelerator

C++MIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2026forkView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolMobile applicationhow this is determined

dannyota/onnxruntime holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (94/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 27 days ago. 16 contributors account for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Danny On The AirPersonal account
6 followers28 public repossince Nov 2025

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmonnxruntime-webpoints to another repo — not scored1.29.016,410,51638514 days agoonnxonnxruntimeonnx-runtime
npmonnxruntime-nodepoints to another repo — not scored1.29.023,310,72817114 days agoonnxonnxruntimeonnx-runtime
npmonnxruntime-commonpoints to another repo — not scored1.29.031,365,03713114 days agoonnxonnxruntimeonnx-runtime
crates.ioonnxruntimepoints to another repo — not scored0.0.14828131863 days agobindingsneuralnetworksonnxscience
npmonnxruntime-react-nativepoints to another repo — not scored1.24.393,36067186 days agoreact-nativeiosandroidonnxonnxruntimeonnx-runtime
crates.ioonnxruntime-syspoints to another repo — not scored0.0.14848131863 days agobindingsneuralnetworksonnxscience

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 27 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,725 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedno data
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,725
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push27
active_weeks_last_year49
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases69 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 88 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~28.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count69
latest_release_tagv1.27.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release88
mean_days_between_releases28.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars0 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
54/54Bus factor16 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
21/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 7% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth98 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsno data
Inputs used
bus_factor16
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.066
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance0/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewno data
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
6.1/25Owner reach6 followers of dannyota
12.3/25Track record28 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers6
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logindannyota
public_repos28
account_age_days296
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows48 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml, eslint.config.mjs, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://onnxruntime.ai
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://onnxruntime.ai
docs_sitehttps://onnxruntime.ai
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

93Exceptional · 16% of overall

Security posture

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25Dependabot config
25/25Dependency lockfilespackage-lock.json
20/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilespackage-lock.json
manifestsgo/go.mod, java/build.gradle, js/package.json, pyproject.toml, requirements-dev.txt, requirements-doc.txt, requirements-lintrunner.txt, requirements-materialize-onnx-node-tests.txt, requirements-training.txt, requirements.txt, rust/Cargo.toml, setup.py
has_codeql_workflowyes
has_security_policyyes
has_dependabot_configyes
How it's scored
32.2/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: tracing-subscriber 0.2.25 (low)
6.7/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories4 affected: tar 0.4.40 (high 8.1), time 0.1.45 (moderate 6.2), adler 1.0.2 (unknown), +1 more
26.1/40No advisories left outstanding5 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,120 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories11
affected_packages5
assessed_packages124
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 1, low 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the crates:onnxruntime@0.0.14 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 124 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

94Exceptional · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,586
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstraprust/justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml, eslint.config.mjs, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checkingjs/common/test/tsconfig.json, js/common/test/type-tests/tsconfig.json, js/common/tsconfig.json, js/node/script/tsconfig.json, js/node/test/tsconfig.json, js/node/tsconfig.json, js/react_native/tsconfig.json, js/scripts/tsconfig.json, js/tsconfig.json, js/web/lib/wasm/proxy-worker/tsconfig.json, js/web/script/tsconfig.json, js/web/test/e2e/exports/testcases/nextjs-default/jsconfig.json, js/web/test/e2e/type/testcases/module-resolution/tsconfig.json, js/web/tsconfig.json, onnxruntime/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice34 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesrust/justfile
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsjs/common/test/tsconfig.json, js/common/test/type-tests/tsconfig.json, js/common/tsconfig.json, js/node/script/tsconfig.json, js/node/test/tsconfig.json, js/node/tsconfig.json, js/react_native/tsconfig.json, js/scripts/tsconfig.json, js/tsconfig.json, js/web/lib/wasm/proxy-worker/tsconfig.json, js/web/script/tsconfig.json, js/web/test/e2e/exports/testcases/nextjs-default/jsconfig.json, js/web/test/e2e/type/testcases/module-resolution/tsconfig.json, js/web/tsconfig.json, onnxruntime/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.34
toolchain_manifestscsharp/ApiDocs/ApiDocs.csproj, csharp/sample/InferenceSample/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.InferenceSample.Maui/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.InferenceSample.Maui.csproj, csharp/sample/InferenceSample/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.InferenceSample.NetCoreApp/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.InferenceSample.NetCoreApp.csproj, csharp/sample/InferenceSample/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.InferenceSample/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.InferenceSample.csproj, csharp/sample/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.FasterRcnnSample/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.FasterRcnnSample.csproj, csharp/sample/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.ResNet50v2Sample/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.ResNet50v2Sample.csproj, csharp/src/Microsoft.AI.MachineLearning.Interop/Microsoft.AI.MachineLearning.Interop.csproj, csharp/src/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.csproj, csharp/test/Microsoft.AI.MachineLearning.Tests.DotNet5_0/Microsoft.AI.MachineLearning.Tests.DotNet5_0.csproj, csharp/test/Microsoft.AI.MachineLearning.Tests.Uwp/Microsoft.AI.MachineLearning.Tests.Uwp.csproj, csharp/test/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.EndToEndTests.Mobile/EndToEndTests.Mobile.Automation/EndToEndTests.Mobile.Automation.csproj, csharp/test/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.EndToEndTests/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.EndToEndTests.csproj, csharp/test/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.Tests.BrowserStack.Android/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.Tests.BrowserStack.Android.csproj, csharp/test/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.Tests.Common/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.Tests.Common.csproj, csharp/test/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.Tests.Devices/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.Tests.Devices.csproj, csharp/test/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.Tests.MAUI/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.Tests.MAUI.csproj, csharp/test/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.Tests.NetCoreApp/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.Tests.NetCoreApp.csproj, csharp/tools/MauiModelTester/MauiModelTester.csproj, csharp/tools/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.PerfTool/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.PerfTool.csproj, csharp/tools/linux_pack/LinuxPackNativeNuget.csproj, go/go.mod, java/build.gradle, java/src/test/android/app/build.gradle, java/src/test/android/build.gradle, js/react_native/android/build.gradle, js/react_native/e2e/android/app/build.gradle, js/react_native/e2e/android/build.gradle, plugin-ep-cuda/csharp/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.EP.Cuda/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.EP.Cuda.csproj, plugin-ep-cuda/csharp/test/CudaEpNuGetTest/CudaEpNuGetTest.csproj, plugin-ep-webgpu/csharp/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.EP.WebGpu/Microsoft.ML.OnnxRuntime.EP.WebGpu.csproj, plugin-ep-webgpu/csharp/test/WebGpuEpNuGetTest/WebGpuEpNuGetTest.csproj, rust/Cargo.toml, rust/onnxruntime-sys/Cargo.toml, rust/onnxruntime/Cargo.toml, tools/ci_build/java/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC++ (statically typed)
52.5/55Manageable file sizes330/7,152 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC++
largest_source_bytes2,287,899
source_files_sampled7,152
oversized_source_files330
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)onnxruntime/test/proto/tml.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexample, examples, notebooks, sample, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples, notebooks, sample, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesonnxruntime/test/proto/tml.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
98contributors
1,725commits, last 12 months
27days since last push
69releases
16bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, Go, Maven, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/microsoft/onnxruntime/go' from its registry
  • npm package 'onnxruntime-web' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Microsoft/onnxruntime); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'onnxruntime-node' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Microsoft/onnxruntime); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'onnxruntime-common' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Microsoft/onnxruntime); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'onnxruntime' points at a different repository (https://github.com/nbigaouette/onnxruntime-rs); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package 'onnxruntime-react-native' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Microsoft/onnxruntime); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • crates package 'onnxruntime-sys' points at a different repository (https://github.com/nbigaouette/onnxruntime-rs); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmadm-zip^0.6.0js/node/package.json
npmglobal-agent^4.1.3js/node/package.json
npmonnxruntime-commonfile:../commonjs/node/package.json
npmonnxruntime-commonfile:../commonjs/react_native/package.json
npmflatbuffers^25.1.24js/web/package.json
npmguid-typescript^1.0.9js/web/package.json
npmlong^5.2.3js/web/package.json
npmonnxruntime-commonfile:../commonjs/web/package.json
npmplatform^1.3.6js/web/package.json
npmprotobufjs^7.2.4js/web/package.json
crates.iolibloading0.7rust/onnxruntime-sys/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibloading0.7rust/onnxruntime/Cargo.toml
crates.iondarray0.15rust/onnxruntime/Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell1.17rust/onnxruntime/Cargo.toml
crates.ioonnxruntime-sys0.0.14rust/onnxruntime/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror1.0rust/onnxruntime/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing0.1rust/onnxruntime/Cargo.toml
crates.ioureq2.1rust/onnxruntime/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 5

Installing crates:onnxruntime@0.0.14 pulls in 124 packages, direct and transitive: 5 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
tar0.4.40indirecthigh50.4.46
time0.1.45indirectmoderate20.2.23
tracing-subscriber0.2.25directlow20.3.20
adler1.0.2indirectunknown1
ansi_term0.12.1indirectunknown1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm, crates.io.