Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 05:53 UTC

dcc-mcp / dcc-mcp-unreal

Unreal Engine plugin for the DCC Model Context Protocol (MCP) ecosystem

Python · C++No license detected★ 4 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolPluginhow this is determined

dcc-mcp/dcc-mcp-unreal holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (23/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DCC-MCPOrganization
58 followers90 public repossince Jun 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIdcc-mcp-unreal0.3.06061734 days agoaidccllmmcpmodel-context-protocolunrealunreal-engine

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
9/36Commit cadence — 13/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 284 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year284
human_commit_share0.88
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year13

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 24 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 15 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~3.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tagv0.3.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release15
mean_days_between_releases3.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

23At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars4
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
37.1/80Monthly downloads — 606 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdcc-mcp-unreal
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads606
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.992
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
28.5/30PR acceptance — 189/199 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs189
open_issues0
closed_issues12
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d28
prs_decided_30d29
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs10
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12.7/25Owner reach — 58 followers of dcc-mcp
13.6/25Track record — 90 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers58
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logindcc-mcp
public_repos90
account_age_days105

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 34 days ago
20/20Version history — 17 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdcc-mcp-unreal
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish34

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

92Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://pypi.org/project/dcc-mcp-unreal/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agents, dcc, game-development, mcp, model-context-protocol, unreal-engine, unreal-engine-plugin, dcc-mcp, python, unreal
has_wikino
homepagehttps://pypi.org/project/dcc-mcp-unreal/
docs_sitehttps://pypi.org/project/dcc-mcp-unreal/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
1.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages2
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:dcc-mcp-unreal@0.3.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 2 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 88 of 88 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesJustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
53.8/55Manageable file sizes — 5/220 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes101,876
source_files_sampled220
oversized_source_files5

Key facts

4GitHub stars
2contributors
284commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
24releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
9Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212026-062026-072026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 9
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 05:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2Vulnerabilities8 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIdcc-mcp-core>=0.20.13,<1.0.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 180

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 179 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIdcc-mcp-core—direct
npm@algolia/abtesting1.19.0indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-core1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-plugin-algolia-insights1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-preset-algolia1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/autocomplete-shared1.17.7indirect
npm@algolia/client-abtesting5.53.0indirect
npm@algolia/client-analytics5.53.0indirect
npm@algolia/client-common5.53.0indirect
npm@algolia/client-insights5.53.0indirect
npm@algolia/client-personalization5.53.0indirect
npm@algolia/client-query-suggestions5.53.0indirect
npm@algolia/client-search5.53.0indirect
npm@algolia/ingestion1.53.0indirect
npm@algolia/monitoring1.53.0indirect
npm@algolia/recommend5.53.0indirect
npm@algolia/requester-browser-xhr5.53.0indirect
npm@algolia/requester-fetch5.53.0indirect
npm@algolia/requester-node-http5.53.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.7indirect
npm@docsearch/css3.8.2indirect
npm@docsearch/js3.8.2indirect
npm@docsearch/react3.8.2indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.21.5indirect
npm@iconify-json/simple-icons1.2.85indirect
npm@iconify/types2.0.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.61.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.61.1indirect
npm@shikijs/core2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-javascript2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/langs2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/themes2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/transformers2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/types2.5.0indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.4indirect
npm@types/linkify-it5.0.0indirect
npm@types/markdown-it14.1.2indirect
npm@types/mdast4.0.4indirect
npm@types/mdurl2.0.0indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npm@types/web-bluetooth0.0.21indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.3.1indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue5.2.4indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.35indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.35indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.35indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.35indirect
npm@vue/devtools-api7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/devtools-kit7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/devtools-shared7.7.9indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.5.35indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core3.5.35indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom3.5.35indirect
npm@vue/server-renderer3.5.35indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.35indirect
npm@vueuse/core12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/integrations12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/metadata12.8.2indirect
npm@vueuse/shared12.8.2indirect
npmalgoliasearch5.53.0indirect
npmbirpc2.9.0indirect
npmccount2.0.1indirect
npmcharacter-entities-html42.1.0indirect
npmcharacter-entities-legacy3.0.0indirect
npmcomma-separated-tokens2.0.3indirect
npmcopy-anything4.0.5indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdevlop1.1.0indirect
npmemoji-regex-xs1.0.0indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmesbuild0.21.5indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfocus-trap7.8.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmhast-util-to-html9.0.5indirect
npmhast-util-whitespace3.0.0indirect
npmhookable5.5.3indirect
npmhtml-void-elements3.0.0indirect
npmis-what5.5.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmark.js8.11.1indirect
npmmdast-util-to-hast13.2.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-character2.1.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-encode2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-sanitize-uri2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-symbol2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-types2.0.2indirect
npmminisearch7.2.0indirect
npmmitt3.0.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.12indirect
npmoniguruma-to-es3.1.1indirect
npmperfect-debounce1.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.15indirect
npmpreact10.29.2indirect
npmproperty-information7.2.0indirect
npmregex6.1.0indirect
npmregex-recursion6.0.2indirect
npmregex-utilities2.3.0indirect
npmrfdc1.4.1indirect
npmrollup4.61.1indirect
npmsearch-insights2.17.3indirect
npmshiki2.5.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmspace-separated-tokens2.0.2indirect
npmspeakingurl14.0.1indirect
npmstringify-entities4.0.4indirect
npmsuperjson2.2.6indirect
npmtabbable6.4.0indirect
npmtrim-lines3.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-is6.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-position5.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-stringify-position4.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit5.1.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit-parents6.0.2indirect
npmvfile6.0.3indirect
npmvfile-message4.0.3indirect
npmvite5.4.21indirect
npmvitepress1.6.4indirect
npmvue3.5.35indirect
npmzwitch2.0.4indirect
PyPIjsonschema—indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest-cov—indirect
PyPIpytest-mock—indirect
PyPIpyyaml—indirect
PyPIruff—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:dcc-mcp-unreal@0.3.0 pulls in 2 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.