Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 23:19 UTC

dcouple / Pane

Terminal-first, open-source AI agent manager for any CLI agent (agent agnostic), any OS (mac, windows, linux). The Open-Source Agentic Development Environment for running multiple coding agents in parallel. Run locally or self-host Remote Pane to manage agents from desktop or phone. Simplify multi-agent orchestration with the runpane CLI.

TypeScriptCustom license★ 445 stars⑂ 204 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryMCP serverMobile applicationWeb interfacehow this is determined
#agents#ai#agentic-ai#claude-code#cli#codex#coding-agents#cursor-ai#desktop#developer#electron#git#opencode#orchestration#terminal#worktree-manager#agent-manager#aider#parallel-agents#windows

dcouple/Pane holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Security (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

dcoupleOrganization
7 followers7 public repossince Feb 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmmainpoints to another repo — not scored1000.0.112,772292831 days agomainentry-point
npmrunpane2.4.998,4091110 days ago—
PyPIrunpane2.4.99-1140 days agopaneinstallerremotedaemoncli

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
19.4/36Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,183 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,183
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year28

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.4.99
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

62Moderate
How it's scored
42.9/60Stars — 445 stars
19.2/25Forks — 204 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks204
stars445
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

71Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges10
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

65Good
How it's scored
52.3/80Monthly downloads — 8,409 downloads/month across npm, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesrunpane, runpane
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads8,409
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 11 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled11
top_contributor_share0.977

Issue & PR responsiveness

63Moderate
How it's scored
21.3/42Issue resolution — 51% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance — 379/414 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs379
open_issues72
closed_issues74
prs_merged_7d21
prs_decided_7d23
prs_merged_30d54
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.507
closed_unmerged_prs35
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2

Ownership & stewardship

44Weak
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.5/25Owner reach — 7 followers of dcouple
7.6/25Track record — 7 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers7
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logindcouple
public_repos7
account_age_days190

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 114 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesrunpane, runpane
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://runpane.com/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagents, ai, agentic-ai, claude-code, cli, codex, coding-agents, cursor-ai, desktop, developer, electron, git, opencode, orchestration, terminal, worktree-manager, agent-manager, aider, parallel-agents, windows
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://runpane.com/
docs_sitehttps://runpane.com/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

36Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

36Weak
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 159 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate3.5

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://runpane.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 92 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://runpane.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.92
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes12,488

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

67Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — mobile/android/app/build.gradle, mobile/android/build.gradle (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.js
11/11Static type checking — frontend/tsconfig.json, main/tsconfig.json, mobile/tsconfig.json, packages/runpane/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsfrontend/tsconfig.json, main/tsconfig.json, mobile/tsconfig.json, packages/runpane/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsmobile/android/app/build.gradle, mobile/android/build.gradle
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
53.8/55Manageable file sizes — 17/749 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes261,715
source_files_sampled749
oversized_source_files17

Machine-readable interfaces

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

445GitHub stars
11contributors
1,183commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
72open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • npm package 'main' points at a different repository (https://git.querie.cc/libs/main); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • pypi download statistics for 'runpane' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 204 ⇿
0Stars
204Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020024020492026-032026-062026-09
Major 0Minor 1Patch 95
OpenSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
3.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 23:19 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities159 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 67
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@git-diff-view/react^0.0.40frontend/package.json
npm@git-diff-view/shiki^0.0.40frontend/package.json
npm@headless-tree/core^1.6.3frontend/package.json
npm@headless-tree/react^1.6.3frontend/package.json
npm@monaco-editor/react^4.7.0frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-dialog^1.1.4frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-select^2.1.5frontend/package.json
npm@radix-ui/react-slot^1.1.1frontend/package.json
npm@xterm/addon-fit0.12.0-beta.299frontend/package.json
npm@xterm/addon-image0.10.0-beta.299frontend/package.json
npm@xterm/addon-serialize0.15.0-beta.299frontend/package.json
npm@xterm/addon-unicode110.10.0-beta.299frontend/package.json
npm@xterm/addon-web-links0.13.0-beta.299frontend/package.json
npm@xterm/addon-webgl0.20.0-beta.298frontend/package.json
npm@xterm/xterm6.1.0-beta.302frontend/package.json
npmallotment^1.20.5frontend/package.json
npmansi-to-html^0.7.2frontend/package.json
npmclsx^2.1.1frontend/package.json
npmdompurify^3.2.6frontend/package.json
npmhtml-to-image^1.11.13frontend/package.json
npmimmer^10.1.3frontend/package.json
npmlucide-react^0.468.0frontend/package.json
npmmermaid^11.10.0frontend/package.json
npmmonaco-editor^0.52.2frontend/package.json
npmposthog-js^1.356.1frontend/package.json
npmreact^19.0.0frontend/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.0.0frontend/package.json
npmreact-error-boundary^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npmreact-markdown^10.1.0frontend/package.json
npmremark-gfm^4.0.1frontend/package.json
npmtailwind-merge^2.6.0frontend/package.json
npmzustand^5.0.2frontend/package.json
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk^0.60.0main/package.json
npm@lydell/node-pty1.2.0-beta.3main/package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.12.1main/package.json
npm@xterm/addon-serialize^0.14.0main/package.json
npm@xterm/addon-unicode110.9.0main/package.json
npm@xterm/headless^6.0.0main/package.json
npmbetter-sqlite3-multiple-ciphers12.11.1main/package.json
npmbull^4.16.3main/package.json
npmchokidar^5.0.0main/package.json
npmelectron-updater^6.6.8main/package.json
npmglob^11.0.0main/package.json
npmjs-yaml^4.1.1main/package.json
npmuuid^13.0.0main/package.json
npmweb-streams-polyfill^3.3.3main/package.json
npmws^8.20.1main/package.json
npm@capacitor/android8.5.1mobile/package.json
npm@capacitor/app8.0.1mobile/package.json
npm@capacitor/browser8.0.1mobile/package.json
npm@capacitor/core8.5.1mobile/package.json
npm@capacitor/ios8.5.1mobile/package.json
npm@capacitor/keyboard8.0.1mobile/package.json
npm@capacitor/push-notifications8.0.1mobile/package.json
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk^0.60.0package.json
npm@lydell/node-pty1.2.0-beta.3package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.12.1package.json
npm@xterm/addon-serialize^0.14.0package.json
npm@xterm/addon-unicode110.9.0package.json
npm@xterm/headless^6.0.0package.json
npmbetter-sqlite3-multiple-ciphers12.11.1package.json
npmbull^4.16.3package.json
npmchokidar^5.0.0package.json
npmelectron-updater^6.6.8package.json
npmglob^11.0.0package.json
npmweb-streams-polyfill^3.3.3package.json
npmws^8.20.1package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with dcouple/Pane. Read them side by side →

98awslabs/cli-agent-orchestratorMulti-agent orchestration for AI coding CLIs — Claude Code, Kiro, Codex, and more, coordinated in isolated tmux sessionsExceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional99microsoft/agent-frameworkA framework for building, orchestrating and deploying AI agents and multi-agent workflows with support for Python and .NET.Exceptional98Automattic/studioWordPress Studio, a free desktop app and CLI that helps developers streamline their local WordPress development workflow.Exceptional96Kilo-Org/kilocodeKilo is the all-in-one agentic engineering platform. Build, ship, and iterate faster with the most popular open source coding agent.Exceptional99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, PyPI.