Software health reportschema 0.30.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-03 17:16 UTC

discourse / message_bus

A reliable and robust messaging bus for Ruby and Rack

Ruby · JavaScriptMIT★ 1,662 stars⑂ 130 forkssince May 2013View on GitHub ↗

discourse/message_bus holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (83/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (56/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DiscourseOrganization

800 followers622 public repossince Jan 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	message-bus-client	4.6.0	95,482	24	0 days ago	es6 modules
RubyGems	message_bus	4.6.0	-	93	0 days ago	—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

59Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

51Moderate

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
3.5/36	Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits
11.3/18	Commit volume — 17 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	17
human_commit_share	0.89
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	5

Release discipline

72Good

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 69 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~125.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	69
latest_release_tag	v4.6.0
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	125.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

79Good

How it's scored

52.2/60	Stars — 1,662 stars
17.6/25	Forks — 130 forks
9.3/15	Watchers — 49 watchers

Inputs used

forks	130
stars	1,662
watchers	49
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

83Excellent

How it's scored

66.4/80	Monthly downloads — 95,482 downloads/month across npm, rubygems
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	message-bus-client, message_bus
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm, rubygems
total_downloads	2,681,661
monthly_downloads	95,482
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

61Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 49 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 33 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	49
top_contributor_share	0.457

Issue & PR responsiveness

85Excellent

How it's scored

34.9/42	Issue resolution — 83% of issues closed
24.4/30	PR acceptance — 213/262 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	213
open_issues	21
closed_issues	103
prs_merged_7d	1
prs_decided_7d	1
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	0.831
closed_unmerged_prs	49
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

95Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
20.9/25	Owner reach — 800 followers of discourse
25/25	Track record — 622 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	800
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	discourse
public_repos	622
account_age_days	4,954

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm, rubygems
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 93 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	message-bus-client, message_bus
ecosystems	npm, rubygems
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

64Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

74Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .eslintrc.js, .rubocop.yml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
10/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 17 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 1 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	rubygem
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

46Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 17 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 33 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 21 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4.6

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	28
affected_packages	12
assessed_packages	192
unassessed_packages	20
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 8, moderate 2, low 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 192 resolved dependencies against OSV. 20 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 74 of 89 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.831
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

51Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .eslintrc.js, .rubocop.yml
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 11 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.11

Code legibility for models

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
53.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/51 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Ruby
largest_source_bytes	265,218
source_files_sampled	51
oversized_source_files	1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,662GitHub stars

49contributors

17commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

69releases

2bus factor

21open issues

npm, RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
deps.dev does not index npm:message-bus-client@4.6.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 130 ⇿

0Stars

130Forks

65Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 4Minor 9Patch 52

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10

4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-03 17:16 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
5	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
5	CI-Tests	17 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 33 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	21 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 212

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 212 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@bazel/runfiles	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.9.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/eslintrc	`2.1.4`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`8.57.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/config-array	`0.13.0`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/object-schema	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@ungap/structured-clone	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	accepts	`1.3.8`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.15.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	array-flatten	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	async	`3.2.6`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	body-parser	`1.20.3`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	bytes	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	call-bind-apply-helpers	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	call-bound	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	callsites	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	content-disposition	`0.5.4`	indirect
npm	content-type	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	cookie	`0.7.1`	indirect
npm	cookie-signature	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	core-util-is	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	debug	`2.6.9`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	depd	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	destroy	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	doctrine	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	dunder-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	ee-first	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	ejs	`3.1.10`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	encodeurl	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	es-define-property	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	es-errors	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	es-object-atoms	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	escape-html	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`8.57.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`7.2.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	espree	`9.6.1`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	etag	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	express	`4.21.2`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.19.1`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	filelist	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	finalhandler	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	forwarded	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	fresh	`0.5.2`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	get-proto	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.2.3`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`13.24.0`	indirect
npm	gopd	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	graphemer	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	http-errors	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.4.24`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	immediate	`3.0.6`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	ipaddr.js	`1.9.1`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-path-inside	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	isarray	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jake	`10.9.4`	indirect
npm	jasmine-browser-runner	`0.10.0`	indirect
npm	jasmine-core	`3.99.1`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	jszip	`3.10.1`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	lie	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.merge	`4.6.2`	indirect
npm	math-intrinsics	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	media-typer	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	merge-descriptors	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	methods	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	mime	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.52.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.35`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`5.1.6`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	negotiator	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.13.4`	indirect
npm	on-finished	`2.4.1`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.4`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	pako	`1.0.11`	indirect
npm	parent-module	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parseurl	`1.3.3`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-to-regexp	`0.1.12`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	process-nextick-args	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	proxy-addr	`2.0.7`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.13.0`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	range-parser	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	raw-body	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`2.3.8`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	selenium-webdriver	`4.38.0`	indirect
npm	send	`0.19.0`	indirect
npm	serve-static	`1.16.2`	indirect
npm	setimmediate	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	setprototypeof	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel-list	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	side-channel-map	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	side-channel-weakmap	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	statuses	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	text-table	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	tmp	`0.2.5`	indirect
npm	toidentifier	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	type-is	`1.6.18`	indirect
npm	unpipe	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	utils-merge	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	vary	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	ws	`8.18.3`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect
RubyGems	byebug	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	concurrent-ruby	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	http_parser.rb	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	logger	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	m	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	message_bus	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	method_source	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	minitest	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	minitest-global_expectations	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	minitest-hooks	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	oj	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	pg	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	pitchfork	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rack	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rack-test	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rake	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	redis	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-discourse	`3.8.1`	indirect
RubyGems	sinatra	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	thin	`—`	indirect
RubyGems	yard	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 192 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 20 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
flatted	`3.3.3`	indirect	critical	2	`3.4.2`
brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect	high	4	`5.0.9`
brace-expansion	`2.0.2`	indirect	high	4	`5.0.9`
js-yaml	`4.1.0`	indirect	high	3	`4.3.0`
minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
minimatch	`5.1.6`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
path-to-regexp	`0.1.12`	indirect	high	1	`0.1.13`
tmp	`0.2.5`	indirect	high	1	`0.2.6`
ws	`8.18.3`	indirect	high	2	`8.21.0`
ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.18.0`
qs	`6.13.0`	indirect	moderate	3	`6.15.2`
body-parser	`1.20.3`	indirect	low	1	`2.3.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.30.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm, RubyGems.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records