Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-07-24 20:52 UTC

dnanexus / dx-toolkit

DNAnexus platform client libraries

Python · Java · C++Apache-2.0★ 112 stars⑂ 91 forkssince Jun 2012View on GitHub ↗

dnanexus/dx-toolkit holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (46/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DNAnexusOrganization
158 followers16 public repossince Oct 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIdxpy0.410.045,75237110 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
17.6/18Commit volume — 91 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year91
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year35
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 10 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~18.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.411.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release10
mean_days_between_releases18.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
33.2/60Stars — 112 stars
16.3/25Forks — 91 forks
9.9/15Watchers — 62 watchers
Inputs used
forks91
stars112
watchers62
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
62.1/80Monthly downloads — 45,752 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdxpy
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads45,752
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 38% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.382
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
24.6/30PR acceptance — 1,131/1,379 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 19/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs1,131
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs248
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
15.8/25Owner reach — 158 followers of dnanexus
21/25Track record — 16 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers158
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logindnanexus
public_repos16
account_age_days5,381

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 10 days ago
20/20Version history — 371 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdxpy
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish10

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

46Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

80Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://autodoc.dnanexus.com/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttp://autodoc.dnanexus.com/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 19/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 21 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): branch_protection, dangerous_workflow, packaging, signed_releases, token_permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: urllib3 2.6.3 (high 7.5)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories4
affected_packages1
assessed_packages9
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the pypi:dxpy@0.410.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 9 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — .github/copilot-instructions.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
25.6/40Legible commit history — 48 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.48
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes316
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, doc/examples/dx-assets/qiime_microbiome_example/Makefile, doc/examples/dx-cpp-apps/hello_world_app/Makefile, doc/examples/dx-cpp-apps/hello_world_app/src/Makefile, doc/examples/dx-java-apps/hello_world_java/Makefile, doc/examples/dx-java-apps/parallelism_java/Makefile, src/Makefile, src/cpp/Makefile, src/cpp/test/Makefile, src/dx-verify-file/Makefile, src/python/doc/Makefile, src/ua/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, doc/examples/dx-assets/qiime_microbiome_example/Makefile, doc/examples/dx-cpp-apps/hello_world_app/Makefile, doc/examples/dx-cpp-apps/hello_world_app/src/Makefile, doc/examples/dx-java-apps/hello_world_java/Makefile, doc/examples/dx-java-apps/parallelism_java/Makefile, src/Makefile, src/cpp/Makefile, src/cpp/test/Makefile, src/dx-verify-file/Makefile, src/python/doc/Makefile, src/ua/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/java/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
52.7/55Manageable file sizes — 12/289 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes1,967,816
source_files_sampled289
oversized_source_files12
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files

Key facts

112GitHub stars
99contributors
91commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch maven package 'com.dnanexus:dnanexus-api' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 91 ⇿
0Stars
91Forks
98Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060801009022013-022019-092026-04
Major 0Minor 79Patch 19

Each point covers 13 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-24 20:51 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 19/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities21 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core2.17.1src/java/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api2.17.1src/java/pom.xml
Mavenorg.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient4.5.14src/java/pom.xml
Mavencommons-io:commons-io2.18.0src/java/pom.xml
Mavencommons-codec:commons-codec1.10src/java/pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core2.18.2src/java/pom.xml
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.18.2src/java/pom.xml
Mavencom.google.guava:guava33.4.0-jresrc/java/pom.xml
All dependencies 38

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 30 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core2.18.2direct
Mavencom.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind2.18.2direct
Mavencom.google.guava:guava33.4.0-jredirect
Mavencommons-codec:commons-codec1.10direct
Mavencommons-io:commons-io2.18.0direct
Mavenorg.apache.httpcomponents:httpclient4.5.14direct
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api2.17.1direct
Mavenorg.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core2.17.1direct
Mavencom.dnanexus:maven-dependency-plugin0.1.0-SNAPSHOTindirect
Mavenjunit:junit4.13.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin2.0.2indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin2.8.1indirect
Mavenorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-source-plugin2.4indirect
Mavenorg.mockito:mockito-core2.0.96-betaindirect
PyPIargcompleteindirect
PyPIawscrtindirect
PyPIcertifiindirect
PyPIcrc32cindirect
PyPImock5.2.0indirect
PyPInumpyindirect
PyPIpandas2.0.3indirect
PyPIpandas2.2.3indirect
PyPIparameterized0.8.1indirect
PyPIpexpect4.6indirect
PyPIpip26.0indirect
PyPIpsutilindirect
PyPIpyreadline33.5.6indirect
PyPIpytest7.4.2indirect
PyPIpytest-timeout2.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-xdist3.3.1indirect
PyPIpython-dateutilindirect
PyPIrequestsindirect
PyPIsetuptools78.1.1indirect
PyPIsphinx7.1.2indirect
PyPIurllib3indirect
PyPIwebsocket-clientindirect
PyPIwheel0.42.0indirect
PyPIxattr1.1.4indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing pypi:dxpy@0.410.0 pulls in 9 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
urllib32.6.3directhigh42.7.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.