Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 21:11 UTC

domdfcoding / domdf-folium-tools

Miscellaneous utilities for folium/leaflet.

Python · TypeScriptMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#python

domdfcoding/domdf-folium-tools holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (39/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

67
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

67
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Dominic Davis-FosterPersonal account
49 followers230 public repossince Jul 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIdomdf-folium-tools0.1.0b362,2543554 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

75Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 6 days ago
11.1/36Commit cadence — 16/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 101 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year101
human_commit_share0.91
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year16

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 35 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 54 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~6.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count35
latest_release_tagv0.1.0b36
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release54
mean_days_between_releases6.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

39Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate
How it's scored
44.7/80Monthly downloads — 2,254 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdomdf-folium-tools
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,254
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

20At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

56Moderate
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
25.4/30PR acceptance — 11/13 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs11
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

59Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.2/25Owner reach — 49 followers of domdfcoding
25/25Track record — 230 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers49
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logindomdfcoding
public_repos230
account_age_days4,453
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 54 days ago
20/20Version history — 35 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdomdf-folium-tools
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish54

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

66Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

70Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc.json, .pylintrc, tox.ini
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 1 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspython
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

59Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
5.2/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages14
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:domdf-folium-tools@0.1.0b36 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 14 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

42Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0.6/40Legible commit history — 1 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.011
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

58Moderate
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — justfile
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc.json, .pylintrc, tox.ini
11/11Static type checking — domdf_folium_tools/py.typed, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdomdf_folium_tools/py.typed, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.05

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (domdf_folium_tools/py.typed, tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/17 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes16,584
source_files_sampled17
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
101commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
35releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch npm package 'domdf-folium-tools' from its registry
  • pypi download statistics for 'domdf-folium-tools' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • pypi download figures for domdf-folium-tools carried forward from the previous scan (stats endpoint unavailable this scan)

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 21:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained22 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmleaflet^1.9.4package.json
npmleaflet-timedimension^1.1.1package.json
npmleaflet.heat^0.2.0package.json
All dependencies 175

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 172 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmleaflet1.9.4direct
npmleaflet-timedimension1.1.1direct
npmleaflet.heat0.2.0direct
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/openharmony-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.28.1indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.28.1indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/source-map0.3.11indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@kessler/tableify1.0.2indirect
npm@keyv/serialize1.1.1indirect
npm@sec-ant/readable-stream0.4.1indirect
npm@sindresorhus/is7.2.0indirect
npm@types/eslint9.6.1indirect
npm@types/eslint-scope3.7.7indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/geojson7946.0.16indirect
npm@types/http-cache-semantics4.2.0indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/leaflet1.9.21indirect
npm@types/leaflet.heat0.2.5indirect
npm@types/leaflet.markercluster1.5.6indirect
npm@types/node25.6.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/ast1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/floating-point-hex-parser1.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-api-error1.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-buffer1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-numbers1.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-bytecode1.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-section1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/ieee7541.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/leb1281.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/utf81.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-edit1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-gen1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-opt1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-parser1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wast-printer1.14.1indirect
npm@xtuc/ieee7541.2.0indirect
npm@xtuc/long4.2.2indirect
npmacorn8.16.0indirect
npmacorn-import-phases1.0.4indirect
npmajv8.20.0indirect
npmajv-formats2.1.1indirect
npmajv-keywords5.1.0indirect
npmansi-regex6.2.2indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmansi-styles6.2.3indirect
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.11.21indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmbrowserslist4.28.8indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmbyte-counter0.1.0indirect
npmcacheable-lookup7.0.0indirect
npmcacheable-request13.0.19indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001810indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchange-case5.4.4indirect
npmchrome-trace-event1.0.4indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcommander2.20.3indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdecompress-response10.0.0indirect
npmdeep-extend0.6.0indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.420indirect
npmemoji-regex10.6.0indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.21.2indirect
npmeol0.10.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.1.0indirect
npmesbuild0.28.1indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmeslint-scope5.1.1indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmevents3.3.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.7indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up-simple1.0.1indirect
npmform-data-encoder4.1.0indirect
npmget-east-asian-width1.6.0indirect
npmget-stream9.0.1indirect
npmglob-to-regexp0.4.1indirect
npmgot14.6.6indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhttp-cache-semantics4.2.0indirect
npmhttp2-wrapper2.2.1indirect
npmini1.3.8indirect
npmini6.0.0indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-stream4.0.1indirect
npmiso8601-js-period0.2.1indirect
npmjest-worker27.5.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmkeyv5.6.0indirect
npmlicense-report6.8.2indirect
npmloader-runner4.3.2indirect
npmlowercase-keys3.0.0indirect
npmmerge-stream2.0.0indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmime-db1.54.0indirect
npmmimic-response4.0.0indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmneo-async2.6.2indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.54indirect
npmnormalize-url8.1.1indirect
npmp-cancelable4.0.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmquick-lru5.1.1indirect
npmrc1.2.8indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmresolve-alpn1.2.1indirect
npmresponselike4.0.2indirect
npmschema-utils4.3.3indirect
npmsemver7.8.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map0.7.6indirect
npmsource-map-support0.5.21indirect
npmstring-width7.2.0indirect
npmstring-width8.2.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.2.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments2.0.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmtablemark4.1.0indirect
npmtapable2.3.3indirect
npmterser5.47.1indirect
npmterser-webpack-plugin5.6.0indirect
npmtext-table0.2.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmts-loader9.5.7indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtype-fest4.41.0indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmundici-types7.19.2indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.3.2indirect
npmvisit-values2.0.0indirect
npmwatchpack2.5.1indirect
npmwebpack5.106.2indirect
npmwebpack-sources3.4.1indirect
npmwordwrapjs5.1.1indirect
npmwrap-ansi9.0.2indirect
PyPIbranca—indirect
PyPIdomdf-python-tools—indirect
PyPIfolium—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:domdf-folium-tools@0.1.0b36 pulls in 14 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with domdfcoding/domdf-folium-tools. Read them side by side →

100apache/airflowApache Airflow - A platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflowsExceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional100streamlit/streamlitStreamlit — A faster way to build and share data apps.Exceptional100PrefectHQ/prefectPrefect is a workflow orchestration framework for building resilient data pipelines in Python.Exceptional99pydantic/logfireAI observability platform for production LLM and agent systems.Exceptional99voxel51/fiftyoneRefine high-quality datasets and visual AI modelsExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.