Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 01:31 UTC

droidrun / mobilerun

Automate your mobile devices with natural language commands - an LLM agnostic mobile Agent 🤖

PythonMIT★ 9,137 stars⑂ 982 forkssince Apr 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolMCP serverhow this is determined

droidrun/mobilerun holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Security (45/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DroidrunOrganization
223 followers21 public repossince Apr 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPImobilerun0.6.178,6262213 days ago
PyPIdroidrun0.6.176,32310113 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
34.6/36Commit cadence50/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,001 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,001
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year50

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases61 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 13 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~5.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count61
latest_release_tagv0.6.17
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release13
mean_days_between_releases5.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars9,137 stars
24.9/25Forks982 forks
9.4/15Watchers51 watchers
Inputs used
forks982
stars9,137
watchers51
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
52.5/80Monthly downloads8,626 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesmobilerun
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads8,626
unverified_packages_excludeddroidrun
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 41% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth28 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled28
top_contributor_share0.408
How it's scored
37.9/42Issue resolution90% of issues closed
23.7/30PR acceptance174/220 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs174
open_issues18
closed_issues167
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d17
prs_decided_30d20
issue_closed_ratio0.903
closed_unmerged_prs46
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16.9/25Owner reach223 followers of droidrun
12.5/25Track record21 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers223
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logindroidrun
public_repos21
account_age_days502

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 13 days ago
20/20Version history101 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesmobilerun, droidrun
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish13

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://mobilerun.ai/framework
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agents, android, android-automation, hacktoberfest, mobile-automation
has_wikino
homepagehttps://mobilerun.ai/framework
docs_sitehttps://mobilerun.ai/framework
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities78 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
11.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: mcp 1.27.0 (high 7.6), pyjwt 2.12.1 (high 7.4)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.8/40No advisories left outstanding1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 91 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories151
affected_packages19
assessed_packages197
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severitycritical 3, high 12, moderate 4
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 197 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://mobilerun.ai/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history78 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://mobilerun.ai/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.78
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice9 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.09
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePython without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/172 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes58,057
source_files_sampled172
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

9,137GitHub stars
28contributors
1,001commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
61releases
2bus factor
18open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 982 ⇿
0Stars
982Forks
61Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02004006008001,000979962025-042025-122026-08
Major 0Minor 5Patch 54

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 01:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities78 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPImobilerun==0.6.17compat/pyproject.toml
PyPIasync_adbutilspyproject.toml
PyPIllama-index==0.14.23pyproject.toml
PyPIposthog>=6.7.6pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>=2.11.10pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=14.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIInquirerPy>=0.3.4pyproject.toml
PyPIarize-phoenix>=12.3.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.27.0pyproject.toml
PyPIfilelock>=3.20.0pyproject.toml
PyPIPyJWT>=2.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIllama-index-callbacks-arize-phoenix>=0.6.1pyproject.toml
PyPIllama-index-workflows>=2.16.0,<3.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIaiofiles>=25.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPImcp>=1.26.0pyproject.toml
PyPIllama-index-llms-openai==0.7.10pyproject.toml
PyPIllama-index-llms-openai-like==0.7.2pyproject.toml
PyPIllama-index-llms-google-genai>=0.8.5pyproject.toml
PyPIllama-index-llms-ollama>=0.7.2pyproject.toml
PyPIllama-index-llms-openrouter>=0.4.2pyproject.toml
PyPImobilerun-sdk>=3.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPImobilerun-core-local>=0.6.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 198

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 23 direct and 175 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiofiles25.1.0direct
PyPIarize-phoenix13.21.0direct
PyPIasync-adbutils0.1.1direct
PyPIfilelock3.25.2direct
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIinquirerpy0.3.4direct
PyPIllama-index0.14.23direct
PyPIllama-index-callbacks-arize-phoenix0.7.0direct
PyPIllama-index-llms-google-genai0.9.1direct
PyPIllama-index-llms-ollama0.10.1direct
PyPIllama-index-llms-openai0.7.10direct
PyPIllama-index-llms-openai-like0.7.2direct
PyPIllama-index-llms-openrouter0.5.1direct
PyPIllama-index-workflows2.20.0direct
PyPImcp1.27.0direct
PyPImobilerun0.6.17direct
PyPImobilerun0.6.7direct
PyPImobilerun-core-local0.6.0direct
PyPImobilerun-sdk3.2.0direct
PyPIposthog7.9.12direct
PyPIpydantic2.12.5direct
PyPIpyjwt2.12.1direct
PyPIrich14.3.3direct
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.13.5indirect
PyPIaioitertools0.13.0indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIaiosqlite0.22.1indirect
PyPIalembic1.18.4indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanthropic0.89.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.13.0indirect
PyPIapkutils21.0.0indirect
PyPIarize-phoenix-client2.3.0indirect
PyPIarize-phoenix-evals2.13.0indirect
PyPIarize-phoenix-otel0.15.0indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIauthlib1.6.9indirect
PyPIbackoff2.2.1indirect
PyPIbandit1.9.4indirect
PyPIbanks2.4.1indirect
PyPIblack25.9.0indirect
PyPIboto31.42.83indirect
PyPIbotocore1.42.83indirect
PyPIcachetools7.0.5indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.2.25indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIcigam0.0.3indirect
PyPIclick8.3.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcross-web0.4.1indirect
PyPIcryptography46.0.6indirect
PyPIdataclasses-json0.6.7indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdirtyjson1.0.8indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdnspython2.8.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.17.0indirect
PyPIdparse0.6.4indirect
PyPIemail-validator2.3.0indirect
PyPIfastapi0.135.3indirect
PyPIfiletype1.2.0indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.3.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.49.1indirect
PyPIgoogle-genai1.70.0indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.74.0indirect
PyPIgraphql-core3.2.8indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.3.2indirect
PyPIgriffe2.0.2indirect
PyPIgriffecli2.0.2indirect
PyPIgriffelib2.0.2indirect
PyPIgrpc-interceptor0.15.4indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.80.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhatchlingindirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.3indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjiter0.13.0indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjoblib1.5.3indirect
PyPIjsonpath-ng1.8.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIlangfuse3.12.1indirect
PyPIldap32.9.1indirect
PyPIlia-web0.3.1indirect
PyPIlibrt0.8.1indirect
PyPIllama-index-core0.14.23indirect
PyPIllama-index-embeddings-openai0.6.0indirect
PyPIllama-index-instrumentation0.5.0indirect
PyPIllama-index-llms-anthropic0.8.6indirect
PyPImako1.3.10indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImarshmallow3.26.2indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImypy1.20.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6.1indirect
PyPInltk3.9.4indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.4indirect
PyPIollama0.6.1indirect
PyPIopenai2.30.0indirect
PyPIopeninference-instrumentation0.1.46indirect
PyPIopeninference-instrumentation-llama-index4.3.9indirect
PyPIopeninference-instrumentation-openai0.1.44indirect
PyPIopeninference-semantic-conventions0.1.28indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-api1.40.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp1.40.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-common1.40.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc1.40.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-http1.40.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-instrumentation0.61b0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-proto1.40.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-sdk1.40.0indirect
PyPIopentelemetry-semantic-conventions0.61b0indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.8indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.3indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIpfzy0.3.4indirect
PyPIpillow12.2.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.9.4indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIprometheus-client0.24.1indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIpropcache0.4.1indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.6indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIpy1.11.0indirect
PyPIpyarrow23.0.1indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.3indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-settings2.13.1indirect
PyPIpyelftools0.32indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpystache0.6.8indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpython-multipart0.0.22indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpytz2026.1.post1indirect
PyPIpywin32311indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.4.4indirect
PyPIrequests2.33.1indirect
PyPIretry0.9.2indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.19.1indirect
PyPIruff0.15.9indirect
PyPIs3transfer0.16.0indirect
PyPIsafety3.7.0indirect
PyPIsafety-schemas0.0.16indirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.8.0indirect
PyPIscipy1.17.1indirect
PyPIsetuptools82.0.1indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.49indirect
PyPIsqlean-py3.49.1indirect
PyPIsse-starlette3.3.4indirect
PyPIstarlette1.0.0indirect
PyPIstevedore5.7.0indirect
PyPIstrawberry-graphql0.287.3indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.4indirect
PyPIthreadpoolctl3.6.0indirect
PyPItiktoken0.12.0indirect
PyPItinytag2.2.1indirect
PyPItomlkit0.14.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.3indirect
PyPItyper0.24.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspect0.9.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2026.1indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.43.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.6.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.0indirect
PyPIwrapt1.17.3indirect
PyPIxmltodict1.0.4indirect
PyPIyarl1.23.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
Dependency advisories 19

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 197 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 19 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
black25.9.0indirectcritical326.3.1
cryptography46.0.6indirectcritical950.0.0
pillow12.2.0indirectcritical2612.3.0
mcp1.27.0directhigh61.28.1
pyjwt2.12.1directhigh92.13.0
aiohttp3.13.5indirecthigh283.14.3
banks2.4.1indirecthigh22.4.2
click8.3.2indirecthigh18.3.3
mako1.3.10indirecthigh41.3.12
nltk3.9.4indirecthigh123.10.0
pyasn10.6.3indirecthigh60.6.4
python-multipart0.0.22indirecthigh120.0.31
starlette1.0.0indirecthigh101.3.1
strawberry-graphql0.287.3indirecthigh80.315.7
urllib32.6.3indirecthigh42.7.0
authlib1.6.9indirectmoderate61.7.1
idna3.11indirectmoderate23.15
pydantic-settings2.13.1indirectmoderate12.14.2
setuptools82.0.1indirectmoderate283.0.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.