Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 21:30 UTC

elastic / connectors

Official Elastic connectors for third-party data sources

PythonCustom license★ 135 stars⑂ 207 forkssince Jun 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

elastic/connectors holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on Security (61/100). It was last updated today. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

elasticOrganization
5,645 followers967 public repossince Feb 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
32.5/36Commit cadence — 47/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 212 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year212
human_commit_share0.85
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year47
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 99 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 19 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count99
latest_release_tagv9.5.5
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release19
mean_days_between_releases7.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

74Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
34.5/60Stars — 135 stars
19.3/25Forks — 207 forks
9.6/15Watchers — 54 watchers
Inputs used
forks207
stars135
watchers54
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

86Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

81Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 17% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 73 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled73
top_contributor_share0.168
How it's scored
33.6/42Issue resolution — 80% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance — 3,564/3,892 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs3,564
open_issues154
closed_issues615
prs_merged_7d31
prs_decided_7d34
prs_merged_30d31
prs_decided_30d34
issue_closed_ratio0.8
closed_unmerged_prs328
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 5,645 followers of elastic
25/25Track record — 967 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers5,645
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginelastic
public_repos967
account_age_days4,621

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .ruff.toml, app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/es-connectors.html
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsenterprise-search, app-search, elastic, elastic-stack, elasticsearch, workplace-search
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/es-connectors.html
docs_sitehttps://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/es-connectors.html
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 10 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: aiohttp 3.14.3 (high 7.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories9
affected_packages4
assessed_packages78
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 78 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 85 of 85 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, app/connectors_service/Makefile, libs/connectors_sdk/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .ruff.toml, app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — libs/connectors_sdk/pyrightconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 35 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, app/connectors_service/Makefile, libs/connectors_sdk/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configslibs/connectors_sdk/pyrightconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.35
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (libs/connectors_sdk/pyrightconfig.json)
53.1/55Manageable file sizes — 11/315 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes201,051
source_files_sampled315
oversized_source_files11

Key facts

135GitHub stars
73contributors
212commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
99releases
4bus factor
154open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'elasticsearch-connectors-sdk' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'elasticsearch-connectors' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 207 ⇿
0Stars
207Forks
96Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020024020552022-082024-082026-09
Major 1Minor 7Patch 87

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 21:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 68
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPISQLAlchemy==2.0.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIaioboto3==12.4.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiofiles==23.2.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiogoogle==5.3.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp==3.14.3app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiomysql==0.3.2app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIasyncpg==0.29.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIazure-identity==1.19.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIazure-storage-blob==12.19.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIbeautifulsoup4==4.12.2app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIcertifi==2024.7.4app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIcffi==2.0.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIclick==8.3.3app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIcolorama==0.4.6app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIcron-schedule-triggers==0.0.11app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIecs-logging==2.0.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIelastic-agent-client==0.0.2app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIelastic-transport==8.17.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIelasticsearch==8.18.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIenvyaml==1.10.211231app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIexchangelib==5.4.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastjsonschema==2.16.2app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIgidgethub==5.2.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIgraphql-core==3.2.3app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx-ntlm==1.4.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx==0.27.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIidna==3.18app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIldap3==2.9.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIlxml==6.1.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPImsal==1.37.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPInotion-client==2.2.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIoauthlib==4.0.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIoracledb==2.3.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpip-licenses==5.5.5app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIprotobuf==5.29.6app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpymongo==4.18.2app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpymongo==4.18.2app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIsmbprotocol==1.10.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPImotor==3.7.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography==50.0.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyOpenSSL==26.4.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyasn1==0.6.4app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic==2.10.6app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIPyJWT==2.15.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIPyMySQL==1.1.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpympler==1.0.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil==2.8.2app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-tds==1.15.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpytz==2019.3app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpywinrm==0.4.3app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml==6.0.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIredis==5.0.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests==2.33.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIsimple-term-menu==1.6.4app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy-pytds==0.3.5app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPISQLAlchemy==2.0.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPItabulate==0.9.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPItzcron==1.0.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIurllib3==2.8.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIuvloop==0.20.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIwcmatch==8.4.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIelasticsearch-connectors-sdk@ file:../../libs/connectors_sdkapp/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiofiles==23.2.1libs/connectors_sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp==3.14.3libs/connectors_sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIbase64io==1.0.3libs/connectors_sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastjsonschema==2.16.2libs/connectors_sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIidna==3.18libs/connectors_sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIecs-logging==2.0.0libs/connectors_sdk/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 79

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 60 direct and 19 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaioboto312.4.0direct
PyPIaiofiles23.2.1direct
PyPIaiogoogle5.3.0direct
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3direct
PyPIaiomysql0.3.2direct
PyPIasyncpg0.29.0direct
PyPIazure-identity1.19.0direct
PyPIazure-storage-blob12.19.1direct
PyPIbase64io1.0.3direct
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.12.2direct
PyPIcertifi2024.7.4direct
PyPIcffi2.0.0direct
PyPIclick8.3.3direct
PyPIcolorama0.4.6direct
PyPIcron-schedule-triggers0.0.11direct
PyPIcryptography50.0.0direct
PyPIecs-logging2.0.0direct
PyPIelastic-agent-client0.0.2direct
PyPIelastic-transport8.17.1direct
PyPIelasticsearch8.18.0direct
PyPIenvyaml1.10.211231direct
PyPIexchangelib5.4.0direct
PyPIfastjsonschema2.16.2direct
PyPIgidgethub5.2.1direct
PyPIgraphql-core3.2.3direct
PyPIhttpx0.27.0direct
PyPIhttpx-ntlm1.4.0direct
PyPIidna3.18direct
PyPIldap32.9.1direct
PyPIlxml6.1.0direct
PyPImotor3.7.1direct
PyPImsal1.37.0direct
PyPInotion-client2.2.1direct
PyPIoauthlib4.0.0direct
PyPIoracledb2.3.0direct
PyPIpip-licenses5.5.5direct
PyPIprotobuf5.29.6direct
PyPIpyasn10.6.4direct
PyPIpydantic2.10.6direct
PyPIpyjwt2.15.1direct
PyPIpymongo4.18.2direct
PyPIpympler1.0.1direct
PyPIpymysql1.1.1direct
PyPIpyopenssl26.4.0direct
PyPIpython-dateutil2.8.2direct
PyPIpython-tds1.15.0direct
PyPIpytz2019.3direct
PyPIpywinrm0.4.3direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.1direct
PyPIredis5.0.1direct
PyPIrequests2.33.0direct
PyPIsimple-term-menu1.6.4direct
PyPIsmbprotocol1.10.1direct
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.1direct
PyPIsqlalchemy-pytds0.3.5direct
PyPItabulate0.9.0direct
PyPItzcron1.0.0direct
PyPIurllib32.8.0direct
PyPIuvloop0.20.0direct
PyPIwcmatch8.4.1direct
PyPIaioresponses0.7.6indirect
PyPIboto31.34.69indirect
PyPIfaker18.11.2indirect
PyPIflask2.3.2indirect
PyPIflask-limiter3.3.1indirect
PyPIfreezegun1.2.2indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.40.3indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-storage2.10.0indirect
PyPImysql-connector-python9.0.0indirect
PyPIpyright1.1.317indirect
PyPIpytest7.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio0.21.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov4.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-fail-slow0.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.11.1indirect
PyPIpytest-randomly3.13.0indirect
PyPIruff0.6.3indirect
PyPIsetuptools—indirect
PyPIyattag1.16.0indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 78 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
aiohttp3.14.3directhigh33.14.4
mysql-connector-python9.0.0indirecthigh29.1.0
flask2.3.2indirectmoderate23.1.3
pytest7.4.0indirectmoderate29.0.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.