Public record
Software health reportschema 0.32.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-20 06:45 UTC

elastic / connectors

Official Elastic connectors for third-party data sources

PythonCustom license★ 133 stars⑂ 202 forkssince Jun 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

elastic/connectors holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (67/100). It was last updated today. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 84 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

elasticOrganization
5,501 followers954 public repossince Feb 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
31.8/36Commit cadence46/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume161 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year161
human_commit_share0.83
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year46
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases98 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 14 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~13.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count98
latest_release_tagv9.5.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release14
mean_days_between_releases13.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

74Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
34.4/60Stars133 stars
19.2/25Forks202 forks
9.6/15Watchers54 watchers
Inputs used
forks202
stars133
watchers54
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

86Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

89Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 17% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth69 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled69
top_contributor_share0.174
How it's scored
32.2/42Issue resolution77% of issues closed
27.4/30PR acceptance3,273/3,583 decided PRs merged
9.8/13Newcomer PR acceptance3/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs3,273
open_issues176
closed_issues577
prs_merged_7d10
prs_decided_7d12
prs_merged_30d27
prs_decided_30d30
issue_closed_ratio0.766
closed_unmerged_prs310
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d3
first_time_prs_decided_30d4
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach5,501 followers of elastic
25/25Track record954 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers5,501
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginelastic
public_repos954
account_age_days4,560
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.ruff.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/es-connectors.html
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsenterprise-search, app-search, elastic, elastic-stack, elasticsearch, workplace-search
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/es-connectors.html
docs_sitehttps://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/es-connectors.html
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

75Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories6
affected_packages3
assessed_packages76
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 76 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history83 of 83 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile, app/connectors_service/Makefile, libs/connectors_sdk/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.ruff.toml
11/11Static type checkinglibs/connectors_sdk/pyrightconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice52 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, app/connectors_service/Makefile, libs/connectors_sdk/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configslibs/connectors_sdk/pyrightconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.52
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePython with type-check config (libs/connectors_sdk/pyrightconfig.json)
53.2/55Manageable file sizes10/300 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes143,804
source_files_sampled300
oversized_source_files10

Key facts

133GitHub stars
69contributors
161commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
98releases
4bus factor
176open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'elasticsearch-connectors-sdk' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'elasticsearch-connectors' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 202 ⇿
0Stars
202Forks
94Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020020052022-082024-072026-07
Major 1Minor 7Patch 84

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.9 / 10
6.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-20 06:45 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 66
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPISQLAlchemy==2.0.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIaioboto3==12.4.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiofiles==23.2.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiogoogle==5.3.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp==3.14.3app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiomysql==0.3.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIasyncpg==0.29.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIazure-identity==1.19.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIazure-storage-blob==12.19.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIbeautifulsoup4==4.12.2app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIcertifi==2024.7.4app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIcffi==2.0.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIclick==8.3.3app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIcolorama==0.4.6app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIcron-schedule-triggers==0.0.11app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIecs-logging==2.0.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIelastic-agent-client==0.0.2app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIelastic-transport==8.17.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIelasticsearch==8.18.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIenvyaml==1.10.211231app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIexchangelib==5.4.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastjsonschema==2.16.2app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIgidgethub==5.2.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIgraphql-core==3.2.3app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx-ntlm==1.4.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx==0.27.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIidna==3.18app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIldap3==2.9.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIlxml==6.1.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPImsal==1.37.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPInotion-client==2.2.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIoracledb==2.3.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpip-licenses==5.5.5app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIprotobuf==5.29.6app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpymongo==4.6.3app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpymongo==4.6.3app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIsmbprotocol==1.10.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPImotor==3.4.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography==50.0.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyOpenSSL==26.4.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyasn1==0.6.4app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic==2.10.6app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIPyJWT==2.13.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpympler==1.0.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil==2.8.2app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-tds==1.15.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpytz==2019.3app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpywinrm==0.4.3app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml==6.0.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIredis==5.0.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests==2.33.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIsimple-term-menu==1.6.4app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIsqlalchemy-pytds==0.3.5app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPISQLAlchemy==2.0.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPItabulate==0.9.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPItzcron==1.0.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIurllib3==2.7.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIuvloop==0.20.0app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIwcmatch==8.4.1app/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIelasticsearch-connectors-sdk@ file:../../libs/connectors_sdkapp/connectors_service/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiofiles==23.2.1libs/connectors_sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIaiohttp==3.14.3libs/connectors_sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIbase64io==1.0.3libs/connectors_sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIfastjsonschema==2.16.2libs/connectors_sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIidna==3.18libs/connectors_sdk/pyproject.toml
PyPIecs-logging==2.0.0libs/connectors_sdk/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 77

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 58 direct and 19 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaioboto312.4.0direct
PyPIaiofiles23.2.1direct
PyPIaiogoogle5.3.0direct
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3direct
PyPIaiomysql0.3.0direct
PyPIasyncpg0.29.0direct
PyPIazure-identity1.19.0direct
PyPIazure-storage-blob12.19.1direct
PyPIbase64io1.0.3direct
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.12.2direct
PyPIcertifi2024.7.4direct
PyPIcffi2.0.0direct
PyPIclick8.3.3direct
PyPIcolorama0.4.6direct
PyPIcron-schedule-triggers0.0.11direct
PyPIcryptography50.0.0direct
PyPIecs-logging2.0.0direct
PyPIelastic-agent-client0.0.2direct
PyPIelastic-transport8.17.1direct
PyPIelasticsearch8.18.0direct
PyPIenvyaml1.10.211231direct
PyPIexchangelib5.4.0direct
PyPIfastjsonschema2.16.2direct
PyPIgidgethub5.2.1direct
PyPIgraphql-core3.2.3direct
PyPIhttpx0.27.0direct
PyPIhttpx-ntlm1.4.0direct
PyPIidna3.18direct
PyPIldap32.9.1direct
PyPIlxml6.1.0direct
PyPImotor3.4.0direct
PyPImsal1.37.0direct
PyPInotion-client2.2.1direct
PyPIoracledb2.3.0direct
PyPIpip-licenses5.5.5direct
PyPIprotobuf5.29.6direct
PyPIpyasn10.6.4direct
PyPIpydantic2.10.6direct
PyPIpyjwt2.13.0direct
PyPIpymongo4.6.3direct
PyPIpympler1.0.1direct
PyPIpyopenssl26.4.0direct
PyPIpython-dateutil2.8.2direct
PyPIpython-tds1.15.0direct
PyPIpytz2019.3direct
PyPIpywinrm0.4.3direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.1direct
PyPIredis5.0.1direct
PyPIrequests2.33.0direct
PyPIsimple-term-menu1.6.4direct
PyPIsmbprotocol1.10.1direct
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.1direct
PyPIsqlalchemy-pytds0.3.5direct
PyPItabulate0.9.0direct
PyPItzcron1.0.0direct
PyPIurllib32.7.0direct
PyPIuvloop0.20.0direct
PyPIwcmatch8.4.1direct
PyPIaioresponses0.7.6indirect
PyPIboto31.34.69indirect
PyPIfaker18.11.2indirect
PyPIflask2.3.2indirect
PyPIflask-limiter3.3.1indirect
PyPIfreezegun1.2.2indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.40.3indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-storage2.10.0indirect
PyPImysql-connector-python9.0.0indirect
PyPIpyright1.1.317indirect
PyPIpytest7.4.0indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio0.21.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov4.1.0indirect
PyPIpytest-fail-slow0.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.11.1indirect
PyPIpytest-randomly3.13.0indirect
PyPIruff0.6.3indirect
PyPIsetuptoolsindirect
PyPIyattag1.16.0indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 76 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
mysql-connector-python9.0.0indirecthigh29.1.0
flask2.3.2indirectmoderate23.1.3
pytest7.4.0indirectmoderate29.0.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.32.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.