Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-22 06:35 UTC

entigolabs / entigo-infralib

Production-tested Terraform modules and Helm charts for running a complete Kubernetes platform on AWS or Google Cloud.

HCL · Go · ShellAGPL-3.0★ 15 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jun 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

entigolabs/entigo-infralib holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (100/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (33/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Entigo OÜOrganization
5 followers19 public repossince Aug 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

100Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 2,459 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year2,459
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.24.20
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases0.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
18.6/60Stars — 15 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars15
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 62% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 14 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled14
top_contributor_share0.616
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
28.6/30PR acceptance — 1,818/1,905 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs1,818
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d30
prs_decided_7d30
prs_merged_30d60
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs87
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
5.6/25Owner reach — 5 followers of entigolabs
21.5/25Track record — 19 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers5
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginentigolabs
public_repos19
account_age_days2,249

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 26 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 16 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://www.entigo.com/infralib
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsargocd, aws, devops, gcp, gitops, infrastucture-as-code, internal-developer-platform, kubernetes, opentofu, platform-engineering
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.entigo.com/infralib
docs_sitehttps://www.entigo.com/infralib
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 16 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go v1.44.122 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
37.2/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,713 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories63
affected_packages14
assessed_packages113
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 7, moderate 2, low 1, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 113 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.entigo.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 84 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.entigo.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.84
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — common/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 45 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.45
toolchain_manifestscommon/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — HCL without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/79 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageHCL
largest_source_bytes32,914
source_files_sampled79
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

15GitHub stars
14contributors
2,459commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch go package 'github.com/entigolabs/entigo-infralib-testing' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212025-122026-042026-08
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-22 06:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests16 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-gov1.44.122common/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gruntwork-io/terratestv0.47.2common/go.mod
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.28.4common/go.mod
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.28.4common/go.mod
Gocloud.google.com/go/storagev1.47.0common/go.mod
Gogithub.com/oracle/oci-go-sdk/v65v65.120.0common/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.10.0common/go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.209.0common/go.mod
All dependencies 113

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 105 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gocloud.google.com/go/storagev1.47.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-gov1.44.122direct
Gogithub.com/gruntwork-io/terratestv0.47.2direct
Gogithub.com/oracle/oci-go-sdk/v65v65.120.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.10.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.209.0direct
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.28.4direct
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.28.4direct
Gocel.dev/exprv0.19.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/gov0.116.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/authv0.11.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/auth/oauth2adaptv0.2.6indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/cloudbuildv1.19.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadatav0.5.2indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/iamv1.2.2indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/longrunningv0.6.3indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/monitoringv1.21.2indirect
Gofilippo.io/edwards25519v1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/boombuler/barcodev1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/census-instrumentation/opencensus-protov0.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cncf/xds/gov0.0.0-20240905190251-b4127c9b8d78indirect
Gogithub.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2v2.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/cliv20.10.9+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/distributionv2.8.2+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/dockerv25.0.6+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/docker-credential-helpersv0.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restful/v3v3.12.1indirect
Gogithub.com/envoyproxy/go-control-planev0.13.1indirect
Gogithub.com/envoyproxy/protoc-gen-validatev1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-errors/errorsv1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointerv0.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreferencev0.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swagv0.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-sql-driver/mysqlv1.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gofrs/flockv0.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobufv1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcachev0.0.0-20241129210726-2c02b8208cf8indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobufv1.5.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic-modelsv0.6.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-containerregistryv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gofuzzv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/s2a-gov0.1.8indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/enterprise-certificate-proxyv0.3.4indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2v2.14.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googlecloudplatform/opentelemetry-operations-go/detectors/gcpv1.25.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googlecloudplatform/opentelemetry-operations-go/exporter/metricv0.49.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googlecloudplatform/opentelemetry-operations-go/internal/resourcemappingv0.49.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gruntwork-io/go-commonsv0.17.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/imdario/mergov0.3.16indirect
Gogithub.com/jmespath/go-jmespathv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/internv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/gov1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.17.11indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjsonv0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-zglobv0.0.6indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/spdystreamv0.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrentv0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect2v1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautonegv0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/go-digestv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/image-specv1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/planetscale/vtprotobufv0.6.1-0.20240319094008-0393e58bdf10indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pquerna/otpv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/russross/blackfriday/v2v2.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/sony/gobreaker/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v2v2.27.5indirect
Gogithub.com/xrash/smetricsv0.0.0-20240521201337-686a1a2994c1indirect
Gogithub.com/youmark/pkcs8v0.0.0-20240726163527-a2c0da244d78indirect
Gogo.opencensus.iov0.24.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/detectors/gcpv1.32.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpcv0.57.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.57.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.32.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.32.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.32.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/metricv1.32.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.32.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.24.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.43.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.8.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genprotov0.0.0-20241202173237-19429a94021aindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20241202173237-19429a94021aindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20241202173237-19429a94021aindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.68.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc/stats/opentelemetryv0.0.0-20241028142157-ada6787961b3indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.35.2indirect
Gogopkg.in/inf.v0v0.9.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Gok8s.io/apiv0.28.4indirect
Gok8s.io/klog/v2v2.130.1indirect
Gok8s.io/kube-openapiv0.0.0-20241127205056-99599406b04findirect
Gok8s.io/utilsv0.0.0-20241104163129-6fe5fd82f078indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/jsonv0.0.0-20241014173422-cfa47c3a1cc8indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v4v4.4.3indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/yamlv1.4.0indirect
Dependency advisories 14

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 113 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 14 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
google.golang.org/grpcv1.68.0indirectcritical101.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
github.com/docker/cliv20.10.9+incompatibleindirecthigh229.2.0+incompatible
github.com/docker/dockerv25.0.6+incompatibleindirecthigh1128.0.0
github.com/klauspost/compressv1.17.11indirecthigh21.18.7
github.com/moby/spdystreamv0.5.0indirecthigh20.5.1
github.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.8.1indirecthigh21.9.3
go.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.32.0indirecthigh81.45.0
golang.org/x/oauth2v0.24.0indirecthigh20.27.0
github.com/docker/distributionv2.8.2+incompatibleindirectmoderate13.1.2
golang.org/x/netv0.54.0indirectmoderate131.27.2
filippo.io/edwards25519v1.1.0indirectlow21.1.1
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-gov1.44.122directunknown2—
golang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirectunknown40.56.0
golang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirectunknown20.41.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.