Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 23:32 UTC

filipexyz / ravi

A personal agent harness in WhatsApp — keeping context, routing work, and coordinating specialized agents across my day

TypeScript · Swift · DartNo license detected★ 6 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryMCP serverTerminal interfacehow this is determined

filipexyz/ravi holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (31/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

LuísPersonal account
25 followers43 public repossince Jul 2015

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmravi.bot3.260702.15,83924565 days agoaiagentbotchatbotwhatsappnats

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
21.5/36Commit cadence31/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,737 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,737
human_commit_share0.76
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year31
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases1 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 132 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv3.260425.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release132
mean_days_between_releases
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

31At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
11.3/60Stars6 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars6
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
50.2/80Monthly downloads5,839 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesravi.bot
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads5,839
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

51Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 79% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.79
How it's scored
12.7/42Issue resolution30% of issues closed
22.2/30PR acceptance212/287 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs212
open_issues113
closed_issues49
prs_merged_7d11
prs_decided_7d11
prs_merged_30d34
prs_decided_30d60
issue_closed_ratio0.302
closed_unmerged_prs75
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
10.2/25Owner reach25 followers of filipexyz
24/25Track record43 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers25
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginfilipexyz
public_repos43
account_age_days4,054
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 65 days ago
20/20Version history245 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesravi.bot
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish65

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configbiome.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://ravi.bot
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://ravi.bot
docs_sitehttps://ravi.bot
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

35Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
12.7/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories2 affected: diff 8.0.2 (moderate 5.3), file-type 16.5.4 (moderate 5.3)
31.6/40No advisories left outstanding2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 234 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages2
assessed_packages374
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitymoderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the npm:ravi.bot@3.260702.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 374 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

84Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history76 of 76 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes32,073
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configbiome.json
11/11Static type checkingpackages/ravi-os-sdk/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice11 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configspackages/ravi-os-sdk/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.11
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
52.6/55Manageable file sizes50/1,146 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes1,858,952
source_files_sampled1,146
oversized_source_files50
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)docs/openapi.json, openapi.json
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexample, examples, recipes
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, examples, recipes
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_filesdocs/openapi.json, openapi.json
interfaces_expected_of

Key facts

6GitHub stars
4contributors
1,737commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
113open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1 ⇿
0Stars
1Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212026-062026-072026-08
OpenSSF Scorecard 2.4 / 10
2.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 23:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0Dangerous-Workflowdangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk^0.3.170package.json
npm@anthropic-ai/sdk^0.104.1package.json
npm@elevenlabs/elevenlabs-js^2.37.0package.json
npm@google/genai^1.41.0package.json
npm@hapi/boom^10.0.1package.json
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.29.0package.json
npm@opentui/core0.5.6package.json
npm@opentui/react0.5.6package.json
npm@strudel/web1.3.0package.json
npmagora-agent-server-sdk^1.3.2package.json
npmcommander^14.0.2package.json
npmcroner^10.0.1package.json
npmink^6.6.0package.json
npmink-text-input^6.0.0package.json
npmnats^2.29.3package.json
npmopenai^6.17.0package.json
npmpino^9.6.0package.json
npmqrcode-terminal^0.12.0package.json
npmreact^19.2.4package.json
npmreflect-metadata^0.2.2package.json
npmws8.21.3package.json
npmzod^4.3.6package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 2

Installing npm:ravi.bot@3.260702.1 pulls in 374 packages, direct and transitive: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
diff8.0.2indirectmoderate18.0.3
file-type16.5.4indirectmoderate121.3.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.