Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-12 16:20 UTC

fingerprintjs / python-sdk

Python SDK for Fingerprint Server API

Python · MustacheMIT★ 24 stars⑂ 7 forkssince Jul 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#audio-fingerprinting#browser#browser-fingerprint#browser-fingerprinting#detection#fingerprint#fingerprinting#fingerprintjs#fingerprintjs-pro#fraud#fraud-detection#identification#pypy3#python#python3#visitor-identification

fingerprintjs/python-sdk holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (53/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Fingerprint ®Organization · verified domain
631 followers85 public repossince Jun 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIfingerprint_server_sdk9.8.05,1901214 days agoopenapiopenapi-generatorserver-api

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
18.7/36Commit cadence — 27/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 234 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year234
human_commit_share0.9
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year27

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 86 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~11.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count86
latest_release_tagv9.9.0-rc.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases11.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

33At Risk
How it's scored
22.1/60Stars — 24 stars
6.5/25Forks — 7 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks7
stars24
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

62Moderate
How it's scored
49.5/80Monthly downloads — 5,190 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesfingerprint_server_sdk
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads5,190
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

87Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

61Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 47% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 11 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled11
top_contributor_share0.47

Issue & PR responsiveness

98Exceptional
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
28/30PR acceptance — 220/236 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs220
open_issues0
closed_issues4
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d9
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

95Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
20.1/25Owner reach — 631 followers of fingerprintjs
25/25Track record — 85 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers631
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginfingerprintjs
public_repos85
account_age_days2,304

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 14 days ago
20/20Version history — 12 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesfingerprint_server_sdk
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish14

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 16 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsaudio-fingerprinting, browser, browser-fingerprint, browser-fingerprinting, detection, fingerprint, fingerprinting, fingerprintjs, fingerprintjs-pro, fraud, fraud-detection, identification, pypy3, python, python3, visitor-identification
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

52Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
2/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 30 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages11
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:fingerprint_server_sdk@9.8.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 11 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://dev.fingerprint.com/llms-full.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 90 of 90 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://dev.fingerprint.com/llms-full.txt
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

60Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint])
11/11Static type checking — fingerprint_server_sdk/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml, uv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsfingerprint_server_sdk/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (fingerprint_server_sdk/py.typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 1/90 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes195,789
source_files_sampled90
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

24GitHub stars
11contributors
234commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
86releases
2bus factor
0open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 7 ⇿
0Stars
7Forks
67Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

1234567712022-092024-092026-08
Major 8Minor 29Patch 5

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-12 16:19 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities30 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIurllib3(>=2.1.0,<3.0.0)pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil(>=2.8.2)pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic(>=2)pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions(>=4.7.1)pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography(>=46.0.5)pyproject.toml
All dependencies 166

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 159 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIcryptography47.0.0direct
PyPIcryptography49.0.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0direct
PyPIurllib32.6.3direct
PyPIurllib32.7.0direct
npm@babel/runtime7.25.6indirect
npm@changesets/apply-release-plan7.0.5indirect
npm@changesets/assemble-release-plan6.0.4indirect
npm@changesets/changelog-git0.2.0indirect
npm@changesets/cli2.27.8indirect
npm@changesets/config3.0.3indirect
npm@changesets/errors0.2.0indirect
npm@changesets/get-dependents-graph2.1.2indirect
npm@changesets/get-release-plan4.0.4indirect
npm@changesets/get-version-range-type0.4.0indirect
npm@changesets/git3.0.1indirect
npm@changesets/logger0.1.1indirect
npm@changesets/parse0.4.0indirect
npm@changesets/pre2.0.1indirect
npm@changesets/read0.6.1indirect
npm@changesets/should-skip-package0.1.1indirect
npm@changesets/types4.1.0indirect
npm@changesets/types6.0.0indirect
npm@changesets/write0.3.2indirect
npm@commitlint/config-conventional17.8.1indirect
npm@fingerprintjs/changesets-changelog-format0.2.0indirect
npm@fingerprintjs/commit-lint-dx-team0.1.0indirect
npm@manypkg/find-root1.1.0indirect
npm@manypkg/get-packages1.1.3indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@types/node12.20.55indirect
npm@types/semver7.5.8indirect
npmansi-colors4.1.3indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmargparse1.0.10indirect
npmarray-ify1.0.0indirect
npmarray-union2.1.0indirect
npmbetter-path-resolve1.0.0indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmchardet0.7.0indirect
npmci-info3.9.0indirect
npmcompare-func2.0.0indirect
npmconventional-changelog-conventionalcommits6.1.0indirect
npmcross-spawn5.1.0indirect
npmdetect-indent6.1.0indirect
npmdir-glob3.0.1indirect
npmdot-prop5.3.0indirect
npmenquirer2.4.1indirect
npmesprima4.0.1indirect
npmextendable-error0.1.7indirect
npmexternal-editor3.1.0indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.2indirect
npmfastq1.17.1indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up4.1.0indirect
npmfs-extra7.0.1indirect
npmfs-extra8.1.0indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglobby11.1.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhuman-id1.0.2indirect
npmiconv-lite0.4.24indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-obj2.0.0indirect
npmis-subdir1.2.0indirect
npmis-windows1.0.2indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml3.14.1indirect
npmjsonfile4.0.0indirect
npmlocate-path5.0.0indirect
npmlodash.startcase4.4.0indirect
npmlru-cache4.1.5indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmmri1.2.0indirect
npmos-tmpdir1.0.2indirect
npmoutdent0.5.0indirect
npmp-filter2.1.0indirect
npmp-limit2.3.0indirect
npmp-locate4.1.0indirect
npmp-map2.1.0indirect
npmp-try2.2.0indirect
npmpackage-manager-detector0.2.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.0indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpify4.0.1indirect
npmprettier2.8.8indirect
npmpseudomap1.0.2indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmread-yaml-file1.1.0indirect
npmregenerator-runtime0.14.1indirect
npmresolve-from5.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsemver7.6.3indirect
npmshebang-command1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-regex1.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit3.0.7indirect
npmslash3.0.0indirect
npmspawndamnit2.0.0indirect
npmsprintf-js1.0.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-bom3.0.0indirect
npmterm-size2.2.1indirect
npmtmp0.0.33indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmuniversalify0.1.2indirect
npmwhich1.3.1indirect
npmyallist2.1.2indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.5.0indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.4.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.10.7indirect
PyPIcoverage7.14.3indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.19.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.4indirect
PyPIfingerprint-server-sdk9.9.0rc0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.15indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.11.0indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy2.1.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.4.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.3.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.0indirect
PyPIpycparser2.23indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpytest8.4.2indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.4.2indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.1indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIruff0.15.20indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.9.0.20260124indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.9.0.20260518indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.5.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:fingerprint_server_sdk@9.8.0 pulls in 11 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with fingerprintjs/python-sdk. Read them side by side →

99astral-sh/ruffAn extremely fast Python linter and code formatter, written in Rust.Exceptional98bloomberg/memrayMemray is a memory profiler for PythonExceptional98Skyvern-AI/skyvernAutomate browser based workflows with AIExceptional99litestar-org/litestarLight, flexible and extensible ASGI framework | Built to scaleExceptional98neo4j/neo4j-graphrag-pythonNeo4j GraphRAG for PythonExceptional98neo4j/neo4j-python-driverNeo4j Bolt driver for PythonExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.