Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 20:43 UTC

fugue-project / fugue

A unified interface for distributed computing. Fugue executes SQL, Python, Pandas, and Polars code on Spark, Dask and Ray without any rewrites.

PythonApache-2.0★ 2,169 stars⑂ 103 forkssince Mar 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryhow this is determined
#spark#dask#data-practitioners#machine-learning#distributed-systems#distributed-computing#distributed#sql#pandas

fugue-project/fugue holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (88/100) and lowest on Vitality (42/100). It was last updated 99 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

The Fugue ProjectOrganization
62 followers15 public repossince May 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIfugue0.9.72,182,572126188 days agodistributedsparkdaskrayduckdbsqldsldomain-specific-language

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

42Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

24At Risk
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 99 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
9.7/18Commit volume — 11 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year11
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push99
active_weeks_last_year6

Release discipline

70Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
16.2/36Release recency — latest release 188 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~73.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.9.7
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release188
mean_days_between_releases73.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

81Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

78Good
How it's scored
54.1/60Stars — 2,169 stars
16.7/25Forks — 103 forks
7.2/15Watchers — 21 watchers
Inputs used
forks103
stars2,169
watchers21
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges7
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesapp.codacy.com, badge.fury.io, codecov.io, readthedocs.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 2,182,572 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesfugue
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,182,572
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

57Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 22 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled22
top_contributor_share0.456

Issue & PR responsiveness

90Excellent
How it's scored
37/42Issue resolution — 88% of issues closed
28.2/30PR acceptance — 274/292 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 28/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs274
open_issues33
closed_issues241
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.88
closed_unmerged_prs18
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

64Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12.9/25Owner reach — 62 followers of fugue-project
20.8/25Track record — 15 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers62
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginfugue-project
public_repos15
account_age_days2,299

Package maintenance

91Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 188 days ago
20/20Version history — 126 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesfugue
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish188

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .pylintrc, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
6/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://fugue-tutorials.readthedocs.io/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsspark, dask, data-practitioners, machine-learning, distributed-systems, distributed-computing, distributed, sql, pandas
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://fugue-tutorials.readthedocs.io/
docs_sitehttps://fugue-tutorials.readthedocs.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

35Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.8/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0.5/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: InProgress
6.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 28/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 111 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages10
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:fugue@0.9.7 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 10 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 97 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.97
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .pylintrc, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — fugue/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsfugue/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (fugue/py.typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 2/251 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes88,213
source_files_sampled251
oversized_source_files2

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — notebooks
Inputs used
example_dirsnotebooks
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2,169GitHub stars
22contributors
11commits, last 12 months
99days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
33open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 103 ⇿
0Stars
103Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010012010362020-092023-092026-08
Major 0Minor 4Patch 28

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
3.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 20:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
3CI-Tests9 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
2CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: InProgress
9Code-ReviewFound 28/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities111 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPItriad>=1.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIadagio>=0.2.6pyproject.toml
PyPIpandas<3pyproject.toml
All dependencies 244

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 241 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIadagio0.2.6direct
PyPIpandas2.3.3direct
PyPItriad1.0.1direct
PyPIaccessible-pygments0.0.5indirect
PyPIaiobotocore3.1.1indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.13.3indirect
PyPIaioitertools0.13.0indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIantlr4-python3-runtime4.13.2indirect
PyPIanyio4.12.1indirect
PyPIappnope0.1.4indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi25.1.0indirect
PyPIargon2-cffi-bindings25.1.0indirect
PyPIarrow1.4.0indirect
PyPIastroid3.2.4indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.1indirect
PyPIasync-lru2.1.0indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIatpublic7.0.0indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIautopep82.3.2indirect
PyPIbabel2.18.0indirect
PyPIbeautifulsoup44.14.3indirect
PyPIblack26.1.0indirect
PyPIbleach6.3.0indirect
PyPIblinker1.9.0indirect
PyPIbotocore1.42.30indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.1.4indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIclick8.3.1indirect
PyPIcloudpickle3.1.2indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.2indirect
PyPIcontourpy1.3.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.3indirect
PyPIcycler0.12.1indirect
PyPIdask2026.1.2indirect
PyPIdask-sql2024.5.0indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.20indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdill0.4.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIdistributed2026.1.2indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIduckdb1.4.4indirect
PyPIduckdb-engine0.17.0indirect
PyPIentrypoints0.4indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfastapi0.128.1indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.21.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.20.3indirect
PyPIflake87.3.0indirect
PyPIflask3.1.2indirect
PyPIfonttools4.61.1indirect
PyPIfqdn1.5.1indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.1.0indirect
PyPIfugue-sql-antlr0.2.4indirect
PyPIfugue-sql-antlr-cpp0.2.4indirect
PyPIfuro2025.12.19indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.72.0indirect
PyPIgreenlet3.3.1indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.76.0indirect
PyPIgrpcio-status1.76.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIibis-framework11.0.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.16indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIimagesize1.4.1indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipykernel6.29.5indirect
PyPIipython8.38.0indirect
PyPIipython9.10.0indirect
PyPIipython-genutils0.2.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIisoduration20.11.0indirect
PyPIisort5.13.2indirect
PyPIitsdangerous2.2.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.19.2indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjmespath1.1.0indirect
PyPIjson50.13.0indirect
PyPIjsonpointer3.0.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-client7.4.9indirect
PyPIjupyter-contrib-core0.4.2indirect
PyPIjupyter-contrib-nbextensions0.7.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-events0.12.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-highlight-selected-word0.2.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-lsp2.3.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-nbextensions-configurator0.6.4indirect
PyPIjupyter-server2.17.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-server-terminals0.5.4indirect
PyPIjupyterlab4.5.3indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-pygments0.3.0indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-server2.28.0indirect
PyPIkiwisolver1.4.9indirect
PyPIlark1.3.1indirect
PyPIlibrt0.7.8indirect
PyPIlocket1.0.0indirect
PyPIlxml6.0.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib3.10.8indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.1indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImistune3.2.0indirect
PyPImsgpack1.1.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInbclassic1.3.3indirect
PyPInbclient0.10.4indirect
PyPInbconvert7.17.0indirect
PyPInbformat5.10.4indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInotebook6.5.7indirect
PyPInotebook-shim0.2.4indirect
PyPInumpy2.2.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.2indirect
PyPIoverrides7.7.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.0indirect
PyPIpandocfilters1.5.1indirect
PyPIparso0.8.5indirect
PyPIparsy2.2indirect
PyPIpartd1.4.2indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpillow12.1.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.5.1indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpolars1.38.0indirect
PyPIpolars-runtime-321.38.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.5.1indirect
PyPIprometheus-client0.24.1indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIpropcache0.4.1indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.5indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpy4j0.10.9.9indirect
PyPIpyarrow23.0.0indirect
PyPIpyarrow-hotfix0.7indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.14.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.12.5indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpyflakes3.4.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpylint3.2.6indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpyspark4.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.2indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.0.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpytest-rerunfailures16.1indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-json-logger4.0.0indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpytz2025.2indirect
PyPIpywinpty3.0.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.1.0indirect
PyPIray2.53.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.5indirect
PyPIrfc3339-validator0.1.4indirect
PyPIrfc3986-validator0.1.1indirect
PyPIrfc3987-syntax1.1.0indirect
PyPIrich14.3.2indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIs3fs2026.1.0indirect
PyPIseaborn0.13.2indirect
PyPIsend2trash2.1.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools80.10.2indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer3.0.1indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsoupsieve2.8.3indirect
PyPIsphinx8.1.3indirect
PyPIsphinx9.0.4indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.6.1indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints3.6.2indirect
PyPIsphinx-basic-ng1.0.0b2indirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-theme3.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jquery4.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsqlalchemy2.0.10indirect
PyPIsqlglot27.29.0indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIstarlette0.50.0indirect
PyPItabulate0.9.0indirect
PyPItblib3.2.2indirect
PyPIterminado0.18.1indirect
PyPItinycss21.4.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItomlkit0.14.0indirect
PyPItoolz1.1.0indirect
PyPItornado6.5.4indirect
PyPItraitlets5.14.3indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2025.3indirect
PyPItzlocal5.3.1indirect
PyPIuri-template1.3.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.40.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv20.36.1indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.5.3indirect
PyPIwebcolors25.10.0indirect
PyPIwebencodings0.5.1indirect
PyPIwebsocket-client1.9.0indirect
PyPIwerkzeug3.1.5indirect
PyPIwrapt2.1.1indirect
PyPIyarl1.22.0indirect
PyPIzict3.0.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
PyPIzstandard0.25.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:fugue@0.9.7 pulls in 10 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with fugue-project/fugue. Read them side by side →

98Eventual-Inc/DaftHigh-performance data engine for AI and multimodal workloads. Process images, audio, video, and structured data at any scaleExceptional100ray-project/rayRay is an AI compute engine. Ray consists of a core distributed runtime and a set of AI Libraries for accelerating ML workloads.Exceptional96narwhals-dev/narwhalsLightweight and extensible compatibility layer between dataframe libraries!Exceptional100optuna/optunaA hyperparameter optimization frameworkExceptional99pydata/xarrayN-D labeled arrays and datasets in PythonExceptional99NVIDIA/cudfcuDF - GPU DataFrame Library Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.