Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 18:44 UTC

galetahub / ckeditor

Ckeditor 4.x integration gem for rails

Ruby · JavaScriptMIT★ 2,224 stars⑂ 857 forkssince Jun 2011View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

galetahub/ckeditor holds a health index of 38 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (76/100) and lowest on Vitality (15/100). It was last updated 597 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

38
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

38
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 47 is calibrated to 45 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Igor GaletaPersonal account
108 followers97 public repossince Jan 2009

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsckeditor5.1.3-59787 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

15Critical · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 597 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push597
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

36Weak
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 6 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 802 days ago
5.4/27Release cadence — a release every ~581.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count6
latest_release_tagv5.1.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release802
mean_days_between_releases581.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

76Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

88Excellent
How it's scored
54.3/60Stars — 2,224 stars
24.4/25Forks — 857 forks
9.7/15Watchers — 56 watchers
Inputs used
forks857
stars2,224
watchers56
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

92Excellent
How it's scored
73.6/80Total downloads — 12,031,946 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesckeditor
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads12,031,946
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

39Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 71% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.709

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good
How it's scored
41.1/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
18.3/30PR acceptance — 149/244 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs149
open_issues15
closed_issues689
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.979
closed_unmerged_prs95
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

62Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14.6/25Owner reach — 108 followers of galetahub
25/25Track record — 97 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers108
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logingaletahub
public_repos97
account_age_days6,435
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

69Good
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
4/35Publish recency — latest publish 787 days ago
20/20Version history — 59 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesckeditor
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish787

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

40Weak
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://ckeditor.com/ckeditor-4/
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://ckeditor.com/ckeditor-4/
docs_sitehttps://ckeditor.com/ckeditor-4/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

38Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

29At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

74Good
How it's scored
19.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: carrierwave 2.2.6 (moderate 4.7), sqlite3 1.7.3 (moderate 4.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
35.8/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 108 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories73
affected_packages16
assessed_packages109
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 6, moderate 7, low 2
direct_affected_packages2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 109 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://ckeditor.com/llms.txt)
18.1/40Legible commit history — 34 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://ckeditor.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.34
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

48Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/121 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes41,960
source_files_sampled121
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

2,224GitHub stars
100contributors
0commits, last 12 months
597days since last push
6releases
1bus factor
15open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-02-28: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 2224 stars today.

More detail

Star and fork history 2,224 ★ / 857 ⇿
2,224Stars
857Forks
6Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-02-28. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

04008001,2001,6002,0002,4002,224786162011-082018-112026-02
Major 1Minor 2Patch 3

Each point covers 14 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.9 / 10
2.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 18:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsrails~> 7.2Gemfile
RubyGemssass—Gemfile
RubyGemssassc—Gemfile
RubyGemssprockets-rails—Gemfile
RubyGemssqlite3—Gemfile
RubyGemscarrierwave—Gemfile
RubyGemsdragonfly—Gemfile
RubyGemsmini_magick—Gemfile
RubyGemscarrierwave-mongoid—Gemfile
RubyGemsmongoid—Gemfile
RubyGemsimage_processing—Gemfile
RubyGemsshrine—Gemfile
RubyGemsshrine-mongoid—Gemfile
All dependencies 110

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 97 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemscarrierwave2.2.6direct
RubyGemscarrierwave-mongoid1.4.0direct
RubyGemsdragonfly1.4.0direct
RubyGemsimage_processing1.12.2direct
RubyGemsmini_magick4.13.1direct
RubyGemsmongoid8.1.8direct
RubyGemsrails7.2.2.1direct
RubyGemssass3.7.4direct
RubyGemssassc2.4.0direct
RubyGemsshrine3.6.0direct
RubyGemsshrine-mongoid1.0.0direct
RubyGemssprockets-rails3.5.2direct
RubyGemssqlite31.7.3direct
RubyGemsactioncable7.2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailbox7.2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer7.2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsactionpack7.2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsactiontext7.2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsactionview7.2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsactivejob7.2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel7.2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord7.2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage7.2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport7.2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.8.7indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.2indirect
RubyGemsbase640.2.0indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark0.4.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal3.1.9indirect
RubyGemsbson5.0.0indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemscapybara3.39.2indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.3indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool2.5.0indirect
RubyGemscontent_disposition1.0.0indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.6indirect
RubyGemsdate3.4.1indirect
RubyGemsdown5.4.2indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.1indirect
RubyGemserubi1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsffi1.17.0indirect
RubyGemsglobalid1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.14.5indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.8.0indirect
RubyGemsirb1.15.1indirect
RubyGemsjson2.7.2indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.3indirect
RubyGemslogger1.6.5indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.24.0indirect
RubyGemsmail2.8.1indirect
RubyGemsmarcel1.0.4indirect
RubyGemsmatrix0.4.2indirect
RubyGemsmime-types3.5.2indirect
RubyGemsmime-types-data3.2024.0604indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.5indirect
RubyGemsminitest5.24.1indirect
RubyGemsmongo2.20.0indirect
RubyGemsmongoid-grid_fs2.5.0indirect
RubyGemsmulti_json1.15.0indirect
RubyGemsnet-imap0.5.5indirect
RubyGemsnet-pop0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.2.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.7.4indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.18.2indirect
RubyGemsorm_adapter—indirect
RubyGemsorm_adapter0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsparallel1.25.1indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.3.0indirect
RubyGemspp0.6.2indirect
RubyGemsprettyprint0.2.0indirect
RubyGemspsych5.2.3indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix5.1.1indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack2.2.9indirect
RubyGemsrack-session1.0.2indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.1.0indirect
RubyGemsrackup1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.2.0indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.6.2indirect
RubyGemsrailties7.2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake13.2.1indirect
RubyGemsrb-fsevent0.11.2indirect
RubyGemsrb-inotify0.11.1indirect
RubyGemsrdoc6.11.0indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.9.2indirect
RubyGemsreline0.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.0indirect
RubyGemsrubocop1.64.1indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.31.3indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-rails2.29.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-vips2.2.1indirect
RubyGemsruby2_keywords0.0.5indirect
RubyGemssass-listen4.0.0indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemssprockets4.2.1indirect
RubyGemsssrf_filter1.1.2indirect
RubyGemsstringio3.1.2indirect
RubyGemsthor1.3.2indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.4.3indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width2.5.0indirect
RubyGemsuseragent0.16.11indirect
RubyGemswebrick1.9.1indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.7.7indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsxpath3.2.0indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.6.16indirect
Dependency advisories 16

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 109 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 16 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
activestorage7.2.2.1indirectcritical78.1.3.1
activesupport7.2.2.1indirecthigh38.1.2.1
addressable2.8.7indirecthigh12.9.0
concurrent-ruby1.3.3indirecthigh31.3.7
nokogiri1.18.2indirecthigh151.19.4
rack2.2.9indirecthigh223.2.6
websocket-driver0.7.7indirecthigh40.8.2
carrierwave2.2.6directmoderate13.1.3
sqlite31.7.3directmoderate12.9.5
activerecord7.2.2.1indirectmoderate18.0.2.1
loofah2.24.0indirectmoderate12.25.2
mail2.8.1indirectmoderate12.9.1
net-imap0.5.5indirectmoderate100.6.4.1
rexml3.4.0indirectmoderate13.4.2
actionview7.2.2.1indirectlow18.1.2.1
rails-html-sanitizer1.6.2indirectlow11.7.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with galetahub/ckeditor. Read them side by side →

100apache/arrowApache Arrow is the universal columnar format and multi-language toolbox for fast data interchange and in-memory analyticsExceptional99open-telemetry/opentelemetry-rubyOpenTelemetry Ruby API & SDK, and related gemsExceptional99opf/openprojectOpenProject is the leading open source project management software for product, project and portfolio management. A powerful Jira alternative with agile planning, issue tracking, roadmaps, Gantt charts, time tracking, collaboration features, and more. Available on premises or in the cloud. ⭐ Star us on GitHubExceptional99stripe/stripe-react-nativeReact Native library for Stripe.Exceptional99stripe/stripe-rubyRuby library for the Stripe API. Exceptional99grpc/grpcC++ based gRPC (C++, Python, Ruby, Objective-C, PHP, C#)Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.