Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 02:20 UTC

gtk-rs / gtk-rs-core

Rust bindings for GNOME libraries

RustMIT★ 373 stars⑂ 161 forkssince May 2021View on GitHub ↗

gtk-rs/gtk-rs-core holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (98/100) and lowest on Security (44/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

gtk-rsOrganization
254 followers34 public repossince Apr 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.iogio0.22.94,017,8828018 days agod-busdbusglibgnomegtk-rs
crates.ioglib0.22.95,083,42311418 days agoglibgnomegtk-rsgui
crates.iocairo-rs0.22.93,901,0776318 days agocairognomegtk-rsgui
crates.iopango0.22.93,842,5396318 days agognomegtk-rspango
crates.iogio-unix0.22.818,850780 days agogiognomegtk-rsgui
crates.iographene-rs0.22.8314,1643080 days agognomegraphenegraphene-rsgtk-rsgui
crates.iogio-win320.22.8631780 days agogiognomegtk-rsgui
crates.ioglib-unix0.22.810,778680 days agoglibgnomegtk-rsgui

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

98Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
31.8/36Commit cadence — 46/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 361 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year361
human_commit_share0.51
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year46

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 80 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 18 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~21.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count80
latest_release_tag0.22.9
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release18
mean_days_between_releases21.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
41.7/60Stars — 373 stars
18.4/25Forks — 161 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks161
stars373
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 17,189,344 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgio, glib, cairo-rs, pango, gio-unix, graphene-rs, gio-win32, glib-unix
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads168,972,908
monthly_downloads17,189,344
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 36% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 46 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.365
How it's scored
30.4/42Issue resolution — 72% of issues closed
27.8/30PR acceptance — 1,364/1,474 decided PRs merged
8.7/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 6/9 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs1,364
open_issues137
closed_issues362
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d9
prs_decided_30d13
issue_closed_ratio0.725
closed_unmerged_prs110
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d6
first_time_prs_decided_30d9
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
17.3/25Owner reach — 254 followers of gtk-rs
23.2/25Track record — 34 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers254
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logingtk-rs
public_repos34
account_age_days4,187

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 18 days ago
20/20Version history — 114 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgio, glib, cairo-rs, pango, gio-unix, graphene-rs, gio-win32, glib-unix
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish18

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://gtk-rs.org/gtk-rs-core
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgtk-rs, cairo, gdk-pixbuf, gio, glib, pango, pangocairo, graphene
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://gtk-rs.org/gtk-rs-core
docs_sitehttps://gtk-rs.org/gtk-rs-core
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2/2.5CI-Tests — 13 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 46 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.9
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier30
security_posture_before_jurisdiction59
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories9
affected_packages3
assessed_packages195
unassessed_packages29
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 1, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 195 resolved dependencies against OSV. 29 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
39.7/40Legible commit history — 38 of 51 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.745
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, cairo/Cargo.toml, cairo/sys/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 11 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, cairo/Cargo.toml, cairo/sys/Cargo.toml, examples/Cargo.toml, gdk-pixbuf/Cargo.toml, gdk-pixbuf/sys/Cargo.toml, gio-unix/Cargo.toml, gio-unix/sys/Cargo.toml, gio-win32/Cargo.toml, gio-win32/sys/Cargo.toml, gio/Cargo.toml, gio/sys/Cargo.toml, glib-build-tools/Cargo.toml, glib-macros/Cargo.toml, glib-unix/Cargo.toml, glib-unix/sys/Cargo.toml, glib-win32/Cargo.toml, glib-win32/sys/Cargo.toml, glib/Cargo.toml, glib/gobject-sys/Cargo.toml, glib/sys/Cargo.toml, graphene/Cargo.toml, graphene/sys/Cargo.toml, pango/Cargo.toml, pango/sys/Cargo.toml, pangocairo/Cargo.toml, pangocairo/sys/Cargo.toml, tests/two-levels-glib-dependent/Cargo.toml, tests/two-levels-glib-dependent/glib-dependent-dependent/Cargo.toml, tests/two-levels-glib-dependent/gstreamer/Cargo.toml, tests/two-levels-glib-dependent/gtk/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.11
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.5/55Manageable file sizes — 20/753 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes642,040
source_files_sampled753
oversized_source_files20
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

373GitHub stars
98contributors
361commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
80releases
2bus factor
137open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 161 ⇿
0Stars
161Forks
80Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016016072021-052024-012026-09
Major 0Minor 7Patch 71

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 02:19 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests13 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 6/9 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 46 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 58
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioglib—cairo/Cargo.toml
crates.iocairo-sys-rs—cairo/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc—cairo/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflags—cairo/Cargo.toml
crates.iofreetype-rs0.38cairo/Cargo.toml
crates.iogdk-pixbuf-sys—gdk-pixbuf/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc—gdk-pixbuf/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib—gdk-pixbuf/Cargo.toml
crates.iogio—gdk-pixbuf/Cargo.toml
crates.iogio-unix-sys—gio-unix/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc—gio-unix/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib—gio-unix/Cargo.toml
crates.iogio—gio-unix/Cargo.toml
crates.iogio-win32-sys—gio-win32/Cargo.toml
crates.iogio—gio-win32/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib—gio-win32/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc—gio/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-core0.3gio/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-channel0.3gio/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-io0.3gio/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3gio/Cargo.toml
crates.iogio-sys—gio/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib—gio/Cargo.toml
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2gio/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallvec1gio/Cargo.toml
crates.ioheck0.5glib-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21.0glib-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1.0glib-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn3.0glib-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro-crate3.5glib-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib-unix-sys—glib-unix/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib—glib-unix/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-core0.3glib-unix/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib-win32-sys—glib-win32/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib—glib-win32/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc—glib/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflags—glib/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-core0.3glib/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-task0.3glib/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-executor0.3glib/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-channel0.3glib/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures-util0.3glib/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib-sys—glib/Cargo.toml
crates.iogobject-sys—glib/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib-macros—glib/Cargo.toml
crates.iors-log0.4glib/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallvec1.15glib/Cargo.toml
crates.iogio-sys—glib/Cargo.toml
crates.iomemchr2.8.0glib/Cargo.toml
crates.iographene-sys—graphene/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib—graphene/Cargo.toml
crates.iopango-sys—pango/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib—pango/Cargo.toml
crates.iogio—pango/Cargo.toml
crates.iopangocairo-sys—pangocairo/Cargo.toml
crates.ioglib—pangocairo/Cargo.toml
crates.iopango—pangocairo/Cargo.toml
crates.iocairo-rs—pangocairo/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 224

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 48 direct and 176 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iobitflags2.13.1direct
crates.iobitflags2.9.1direct
crates.iofreetype-rs—direct
crates.iofreetype-rs0.38.0direct
crates.iofutures-channel—direct
crates.iofutures-channel0.3.31direct
crates.iofutures-channel0.3.34direct
crates.iofutures-core—direct
crates.iofutures-core0.3.31direct
crates.iofutures-core0.3.34direct
crates.iofutures-executor—direct
crates.iofutures-executor0.3.31direct
crates.iofutures-executor0.3.34direct
crates.iofutures-io—direct
crates.iofutures-io0.3.34direct
crates.iofutures-task—direct
crates.iofutures-task0.3.31direct
crates.iofutures-task0.3.34direct
crates.iofutures-util—direct
crates.iofutures-util0.3.31direct
crates.iofutures-util0.3.34direct
crates.ioheck—direct
crates.ioheck0.5.0direct
crates.iolibc—direct
crates.iolibc0.2.174direct
crates.iolibc0.2.189direct
crates.iomemchr—direct
crates.iomemchr2.7.5direct
crates.iomemchr2.8.3direct
crates.iopin-project-lite—direct
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.16direct
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17direct
crates.ioproc-macro-crate—direct
crates.ioproc-macro-crate3.3.0direct
crates.ioproc-macro-crate3.5.0direct
crates.ioproc-macro2—direct
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.107direct
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.95direct
crates.ioquote—direct
crates.ioquote1.0.40direct
crates.ioquote1.0.47direct
crates.iosmallvec—direct
crates.iosmallvec1.15.1direct
crates.iosmallvec1.15.2direct
crates.iosyn—direct
crates.iosyn2.0.104direct
crates.iosyn2.0.119direct
crates.iosyn3.0.4direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.5indirect
crates.ioalloca0.4.0indirect
crates.ioanes0.1.6indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioasync-channel—indirect
crates.ioasync-channel2.5.0indirect
crates.ioasync-tls—indirect
crates.ioasync-tls0.13.0indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobase640.21.7indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.iocast0.3.0indirect
crates.iocc1.4.4indirect
crates.iocfg-expr0.18.0indirect
crates.iocfg-expr0.20.9indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iociborium0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-io0.2.2indirect
crates.iociborium-ll0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclap4.6.6indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.6indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.0indirect
crates.ioconcurrent-queue2.5.0indirect
crates.iocriterion—indirect
crates.iocriterion0.8.2indirect
crates.iocriterion-plot0.8.2indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.7indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.20indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.22indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.ioeither1.18.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.ioevent-listener5.4.2indirect
crates.ioevent-listener-strategy0.5.4indirect
crates.iofastrand2.5.0indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.11indirect
crates.iofloat_eq—indirect
crates.iofloat_eq1.0.1indirect
crates.iofreetype-sys0.23.0indirect
crates.iofutures—indirect
crates.iofutures0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-macro0.3.31indirect
crates.iofutures-macro0.3.34indirect
crates.iofutures-sink0.3.34indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.17indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.iogir-format-check0.1.3indirect
crates.ioglob0.3.4indirect
crates.iohalf2.7.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.15.4indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.10.0indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.1indirect
crates.ioitertools0.13.0indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.104indirect
crates.iolibz-sys1.1.29indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolock_api0.4.14indirect
crates.iolog—indirect
crates.iolog0.4.34indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.iooorandom11.1.5indirect
crates.iopage_size0.6.0indirect
crates.ioparking2.2.1indirect
crates.ioparking_lot0.12.5indirect
crates.ioparking_lot_core0.9.12indirect
crates.iopin-utils0.1.0indirect
crates.iopkg-config0.3.32indirect
crates.iopkg-config0.3.34indirect
crates.ioplotters0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-backend0.3.7indirect
crates.ioplotters-svg0.3.7indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorayon1.12.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.5.18indirect
crates.ioregex1.13.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.18indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.ioring0.17.14indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.4indirect
crates.iorustls0.21.12indirect
crates.iorustls-pemfile1.0.4indirect
crates.iorustls-webpki0.101.7indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.23indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.ioscopeguard1.2.0indirect
crates.iosct0.7.1indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.219indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.219indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.151indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned0.6.9indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned1.1.1indirect
crates.ioserial_test—indirect
crates.ioserial_test3.5.0indirect
crates.ioserial_test_derive3.5.0indirect
crates.ioshell-words—indirect
crates.ioshell-words1.1.1indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.10indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iosystem-deps—indirect
crates.iosystem-deps7.0.5indirect
crates.iosystem-deps9.0.0indirect
crates.iotarget-lexicon0.13.2indirect
crates.iotarget-lexicon0.13.5indirect
crates.iotarget-triple1.0.1indirect
crates.iotempfile—indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.iotermcolor1.4.1indirect
crates.iotinytemplate1.2.1indirect
crates.iotoml0.8.23indirect
crates.iotoml1.1.4+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime0.6.11indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime1.1.1+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_edit0.22.27indirect
crates.iotoml_edit0.25.13+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_parser1.1.3+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_writer1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotrybuild—indirect
crates.iotrybuild1.0.120indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.18indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iountrusted0.9.0indirect
crates.iovcpkg0.2.15indirect
crates.ioversion-compare0.2.0indirect
crates.ioversion-compare0.2.1indirect
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.127indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.127indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.127indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.127indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.104indirect
crates.iowebpki0.22.4indirect
crates.iowebpki-roots0.22.6indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys—indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.60.2indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.53.2indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.53.0indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.53.0indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.53.0indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.53.0indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.53.0indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.53.0indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.53.0indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.53.0indirect
crates.iowinnow0.7.12indirect
crates.iowinnow1.0.4indirect
crates.iox11-dl—indirect
crates.iox11-dl2.21.0indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.56indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.56indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.23indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 195 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 29 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
rustls-webpki0.101.7indirecthigh60.104.0-alpha.7
slab0.4.10indirectmoderate20.4.11
rustls-pemfile1.0.4indirectunknown1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.