Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 03:31 UTC

iduxfe / idux

🚀 A UI Component Library for Vue3.x

TypeScript · VueMIT★ 573 stars⑂ 149 forkssince Dec 2020View on GitHub ↗
#components#ui-components#vue#vue3#typescript#idux

iduxfe/idux holds a health index of 62 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (79/100) and lowest on Security (35/100). It was last updated 115 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

62
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

62
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

IDuxFEOrganization
20 followers14 public repossince Nov 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

41Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

28At Risk
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 115 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
13.1/18Commit volume — 28 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year28
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push115
active_weeks_last_year7

Release discipline

60Moderate
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 22 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 990 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count22
latest_release_tagv1.12.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release990
mean_days_between_releases7.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

67Good
How it's scored
44.7/60Stars — 573 stars
18.1/25Forks — 149 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks149
stars573
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

62Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 43% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 56 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled56
top_contributor_share0.43

Issue & PR responsiveness

77Good
How it's scored
37.3/42Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance — 1,607/1,703 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs1,607
open_issues39
closed_issues305
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.887
closed_unmerged_prs96
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

74Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
9.5/25Owner reach — 20 followers of IDuxFE
19.8/25Track record — 14 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers20
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginIDuxFE
public_repos14
account_age_days2,054
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

52Moderate
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
6/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://idux.site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscomponents, ui-components, vue, vue3, typescript, idux
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://idux.site
docs_sitehttps://idux.site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

35Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

35Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.8/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 18 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate3.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc.js
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 1/1,489 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes240,764
source_files_sampled1,489
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

573GitHub stars
56contributors
28commits, last 12 months
115days since last push
22releases
2bus factor
39open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10
3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 03:30 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
3CI-Tests7 out of 21 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 18 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 114

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 114 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop^1.2.1indirect
npm@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop-auto-scroll^1.4.0indirect
npm@atlaskit/pragmatic-drag-and-drop-hitbox^1.0.3indirect
npm@babel/core^7.24.7indirect
npm@babel/preset-env^7.24.7indirect
npm@babel/preset-typescript^7.24.7indirect
npm@commitlint/cli^17.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/config-angular^17.8.1indirect
npm@ctrl/tinycolor^4.1.0indirect
npm@emotion/hash^0.9.1indirect
npm@floating-ui/dom^1.6.7indirect
npm@idux/cdk2.11.0indirect
npm@idux/components2.11.0indirect
npm@idux/pro2.11.0indirect
npm@juggle/resize-observer^3.4.0indirect
npm@ls-lint/ls-lint^1.11.2indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-alias^5.1.1indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-commonjs^26.0.1indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-node-resolve^15.2.3indirect
npm@rollup/plugin-replace^5.0.7indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils^5.1.0indirect
npm@types/bluebird^3.5.42indirect
npm@types/figlet^1.5.8indirect
npm@types/fs-extra^9.0.13indirect
npm@types/gulp^4.0.17indirect
npm@types/inquirer^8.2.10indirect
npm@types/lodash-es^4.17.12indirect
npm@types/marked^4.3.2indirect
npm@types/node^18.19.39indirect
npm@types/prismjs^1.26.4indirect
npm@types/rimraf^4.0.0indirect
npm@types/svgo^2.6.4indirect
npm@types/yaml-front-matter^4.1.3indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin^6.21.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser^6.21.0indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue^4.6.2indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue-jsx^3.1.0indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-c8^0.24.5indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v8^2.1.1indirect
npm@vue/babel-plugin-jsx^1.2.2indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom^3.5.9indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc^3.5.9indirect
npm@vue/eslint-config-prettier^8.0.0indirect
npm@vue/eslint-config-typescript^11.0.3indirect
npm@vue/reactivity^3.4.31indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core^3.5.9indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom^3.5.9indirect
npm@vue/shared^3.5.9indirect
npm@vue/test-utils^2.4.6indirect
npmajv^8.16.0indirect
npmajv-formats^3.0.1indirect
npmc8^7.14.0indirect
npmchalk^4.1.2indirect
npmcodecov^3.8.3indirect
npmcodesandbox^2.2.3indirect
npmcz-git^1.9.3indirect
npmdate-fns^4.1.0indirect
npmesbuild^0.15.18indirect
npmeslint^8.57.0indirect
npmeslint-import-resolver-custom-alias^1.3.2indirect
npmeslint-plugin-header^3.1.1indirect
npmeslint-plugin-import^2.29.1indirect
npmeslint-plugin-jsdoc^46.10.1indirect
npmeslint-plugin-prettier^5.1.3indirect
npmeslint-plugin-vue^9.27.0indirect
npmfast-glob^3.3.2indirect
npmfiglet^1.7.0indirect
npmfs-extra^10.1.0indirect
npmgulp^4.0.2indirect
npmhappy-dom^12.10.3indirect
npmhusky^8.0.3indirect
npminquirer^8.2.6indirect
npmjsdom^25.0.1indirect
npmlerna^7.4.2indirect
npmless^4.2.0indirect
npmlint-staged^13.3.0indirect
npmlodash^4.17.21indirect
npmlodash-es^4.17.21indirect
npmmarkdownlint-cli^0.32.2indirect
npmmarked^4.3.0indirect
npmnpm-run-all^4.1.5indirect
npmora^5.4.1indirect
npmparse5^7.1.2indirect
npmpostcss^8.4.39indirect
npmpostcss-less^6.0.0indirect
npmprettier^3.3.2indirect
npmprismjs^1.29.0indirect
npmresolve-bin^1.0.1indirect
npmrimraf^4.4.0indirect
npmrimraf^4.4.1indirect
npmrollup^4.18.1indirect
npmrollup-plugin-typescript2^0.32.1indirect
npmstylelint^14.16.1indirect
npmstylelint-config-prettier^9.0.5indirect
npmstylelint-config-standard^28.0.0indirect
npmsvgo^2.8.0indirect
npmts-node^10.9.2indirect
npmts-toolbelt^9.6.0indirect
npmtslib^2.6.3indirect
npmtypedoc^0.25.13indirect
npmtypescript^4.9.5indirect
npmunplugin-vue-components^0.22.12indirect
npmvite^4.5.3indirect
npmvite-node^0.34.7indirect
npmvite-plugin-chunk-split^0.5.0indirect
npmvite-plugin-static-copy^0.17.1indirect
npmvitest^2.1.1indirect
npmvue^3.2.29indirect
npmvue^3.4.31indirect
npmvue^3.5.9indirect
npmvue-router^4.2.4indirect
npmvue-router^4.4.0indirect
npmvue3-marquee^3.2.1indirect
npmyaml-front-matter^4.1.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with iduxfe/idux. Read them side by side →

98nuxt/uiThe Intuitive Vue UI Library powered by Reka UI & Tailwind CSS.Exceptional100ionic-team/ionic-frameworkA powerful cross-platform UI toolkit for building native-quality iOS, Android, and Progressive Web Apps with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.Exceptional98Tencent/tdesign-vue-nextA Vue3.x UI components lib for TDesign.Exceptional98storybookjs/storybookStorybook is the industry standard workshop for building, documenting, and testing UI components in isolationExceptional96vuetifyjs/vuetify🐉 Vue Component FrameworkExceptional96surveyjs/survey-libraryOpen-source JavaScript form library for React, Angular, Vue, and plain JavaScript. Render dynamic JSON-driven forms, multi-step form wizards, surveys, quizzes, and other data-entry tools.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.