Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-08 15:50 UTC

inko-lang / inko

A language for building concurrent software with confidence

RustMPL-2.0★ 1,299 stars⑂ 58 forkssince Apr 2015View on GitHub ↗

#rust #compiler #programming-language #llvm #inko

inko-lang/inko holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (53/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

The Inko programming languageOrganization

48 followers13 public repossince Mar 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
crates.io	rtpoints to another repo — not scored	0.19.1	83	33	107 days ago	real-time rtos embedded concurrency no-std
crates.io	typespoints to another repo — not scored	0.1.0	23	1	283 days ago	types dto liturgy data-structures
crates.io	locationpoints to another repo — not scored	0.1.0	17	1	2392 days ago	—

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

99Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
34.6/36	Commit cadence — 50/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 305 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	305
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	50

Release discipline

80Excellent

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 33 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 18 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~83.5 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	33
latest_release_tag	v0.21.1
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	18
mean_days_between_releases	83.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

71Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

71Good

How it's scored

50.5/60	Stars — 1,299 stars
14.6/25	Forks — 58 forks
5.6/15	Watchers — 11 watchers

Inputs used

forks	58
stars	1,299
watchers	11
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MPL-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 26 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	26
top_contributor_share	0.981

Issue & PR responsiveness

59Moderate

How it's scored

38.6/42	Issue resolution — 92% of issues closed
20.6/30	PR acceptance — 55/80 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/3 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	55
open_issues	73
closed_issues	841
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	3
issue_closed_ratio	0.92
closed_unmerged_prs	25
first_time_authors_30d	2
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	3

Ownership & stewardship

72Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
12.2/25	Owner reach — 48 followers of inko-lang
15.1/25	Track record — 13 public repos, account ~3 yr old

Inputs used

followers	48
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	inko-lang
public_repos	13
account_age_days	1,242

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — http://inko-lang.org
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	rust, compiler, programming-language, llvm, inko
has_wiki	no
homepage	http://inko-lang.org
docs_site	http://inko-lang.org
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

50Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

89Excellent

How it's scored

26.6/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: tar 0.4.45 (moderate)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	2
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	147
unassessed_packages	25
affected_by_severity	moderate 2
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 147 resolved dependencies against OSV. 25 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 80 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.8
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

68Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile, std/gen/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
7/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile, std/gen/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, ast/Cargo.toml, compiler/Cargo.toml, inko/Cargo.toml, location/Cargo.toml, rt/Cargo.toml, types/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

95Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
50/55	Manageable file sizes — 12/133 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	362,060
source_files_sampled	133
oversized_source_files	12

Key facts

1,299GitHub stars

26contributors

305commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

33releases

1bus factor

73open issues

crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
crates package 'rt' points at a different repository (https://git.rtng.org/rt/rt); excluded from ecosystem scoring
Could not fetch crates package 'ast' from its registry
Could not fetch crates package 'inko' from its registry
crates package 'types' points at a different repository (https://github.com/ericbreyer/liturgy); excluded from ecosystem scoring
Could not fetch crates package 'compiler' from its registry
crates package 'location' points at a different repository (https://github.com/scorpasdzx/location.git); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 58 ⇿

0Stars

58Forks

33Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 20Patch 13

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10

5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-08 15:50 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
7	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 7
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 29

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	unicode-segmentation	`^1.8`	ast/Cargo.toml
crates.io	location	`—`	ast/Cargo.toml
crates.io	ast	`—`	compiler/Cargo.toml
crates.io	types	`—`	compiler/Cargo.toml
crates.io	location	`—`	compiler/Cargo.toml
crates.io	unicode-width	`^0.2`	compiler/Cargo.toml
crates.io	fnv	`^1.0`	compiler/Cargo.toml
crates.io	blake3	`^1.8`	compiler/Cargo.toml
crates.io	inkwell	`^0.8`	compiler/Cargo.toml
crates.io	indexmap	`^2.6`	compiler/Cargo.toml
crates.io	libc	`^0.2`	compiler/Cargo.toml
crates.io	getopts	`^0.2`	inko/Cargo.toml
crates.io	compiler	`—`	inko/Cargo.toml
crates.io	types	`—`	inko/Cargo.toml
crates.io	ureq	`^3.3`	inko/Cargo.toml
crates.io	rustls-graviola	`^0.2`	inko/Cargo.toml
crates.io	flate2	`^1.0`	inko/Cargo.toml
crates.io	tar	`^0.4`	inko/Cargo.toml
crates.io	blake3	`^1.8`	inko/Cargo.toml
crates.io	atomic-wait	`^1.1`	rt/Cargo.toml
crates.io	libz-rs-sys	`^0.5`	rt/Cargo.toml
crates.io	libc	`^0.2`	rt/Cargo.toml
crates.io	unicode-segmentation	`^1.10`	rt/Cargo.toml
crates.io	backtrace	`^0.3`	rt/Cargo.toml
crates.io	rustls	`^0.23`	rt/Cargo.toml
crates.io	rustls-graviola	`^0.2`	rt/Cargo.toml
crates.io	log	`0.4`	rt/Cargo.toml
crates.io	location	`—`	types/Cargo.toml
crates.io	indexmap	`^2.6`	types/Cargo.toml

All dependencies 172

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 34 direct and 138 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	atomic-wait	`—`	direct
crates.io	atomic-wait	`1.1.0`	direct
crates.io	backtrace	`—`	direct
crates.io	backtrace	`0.3.76`	direct
crates.io	blake3	`—`	direct
crates.io	blake3	`1.8.4`	direct
crates.io	flate2	`—`	direct
crates.io	flate2	`1.1.9`	direct
crates.io	fnv	`—`	direct
crates.io	fnv	`1.0.7`	direct
crates.io	getopts	`—`	direct
crates.io	getopts	`0.2.24`	direct
crates.io	indexmap	`—`	direct
crates.io	indexmap	`2.14.0`	direct
crates.io	inkwell	`—`	direct
crates.io	inkwell	`0.8.0`	direct
crates.io	libc	`—`	direct
crates.io	libc	`0.2.185`	direct
crates.io	libz-rs-sys	`—`	direct
crates.io	libz-rs-sys	`0.5.5`	direct
crates.io	log	`—`	direct
crates.io	log	`0.4.29`	direct
crates.io	rustls	`—`	direct
crates.io	rustls	`0.23.38`	direct
crates.io	rustls-graviola	`—`	direct
crates.io	rustls-graviola	`0.2.1`	direct
crates.io	tar	`—`	direct
crates.io	tar	`0.4.45`	direct
crates.io	unicode-segmentation	`—`	direct
crates.io	unicode-segmentation	`1.13.2`	direct
crates.io	unicode-width	`—`	direct
crates.io	unicode-width	`0.2.2`	direct
crates.io	ureq	`—`	direct
crates.io	ureq	`3.3.0`	direct
crates.io	addr2line	`0.25.1`	indirect
crates.io	adler2	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.103`	indirect
crates.io	arrayref	`0.3.9`	indirect
crates.io	arrayvec	`0.7.6`	indirect
crates.io	base64	`0.22.1`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	bstr	`1.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	bytes	`1.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.2.60`	indirect
crates.io	cesu8	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	combine	`4.6.7`	indirect
crates.io	console	`0.15.11`	indirect
crates.io	constant_time_eq	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation	`—`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation	`0.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation-sys	`—`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation-sys	`0.8.7`	indirect
crates.io	cpufeatures	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	crc32fast	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	encode_unicode	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	filetime	`0.2.27`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	gimli	`0.32.3`	indirect
crates.io	graviola	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.17.0`	indirect
crates.io	http	`1.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	httparse	`1.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	inkwell_internals	`0.13.0`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	jni	`0.21.1`	indirect
crates.io	jni-sys	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	jni-sys	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	jni-sys-macros	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	libredox	`0.1.16`	indirect
crates.io	llvm-sys	`181.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	miniz_oxide	`0.8.9`	indirect
crates.io	object	`0.37.3`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	indirect
crates.io	openssl-probe	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	percent-encoding	`2.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	plain	`0.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.45`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`5.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	redox_syscall	`0.7.4`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.14`	indirect
crates.io	regex-lite	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	ring	`0.17.14`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-demangle	`0.1.27`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-native-certs	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-native-certs	`0.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-pki-types	`1.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-platform-verifier	`0.6.2`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-platform-verifier-android	`0.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-webpki	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-webpki	`0.103.13`	indirect
crates.io	same-file	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	schannel	`0.1.29`	indirect
crates.io	security-framework	`—`	indirect
crates.io	security-framework	`3.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	security-framework-sys	`—`	indirect
crates.io	security-framework-sys	`2.17.0`	indirect
crates.io	semver	`1.0.28`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`1.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	simd-adler32	`0.3.9`	indirect
crates.io	similar	`2.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	similar-asserts	`—`	indirect
crates.io	similar-asserts	`1.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	subtle	`2.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.117`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.24`	indirect
crates.io	untrusted	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	ureq-proto	`0.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	utf8-zero	`0.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	walkdir	`2.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	wasip2	`1.0.2+wasi-0.2.9`	indirect
crates.io	webpki-root-certs	`1.0.6`	indirect
crates.io	winapi-util	`0.1.11`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`—`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.42.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.45.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.52.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.59.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	zeroize	`1.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	zlib-rs	`0.5.5`	indirect
RubyGems	ansi	`1.5.0`	indirect
RubyGems	ast	`2.3.0`	indirect
RubyGems	diff-lcs	`1.3`	indirect
RubyGems	parallel	`1.11.2`	indirect
RubyGems	parser	`2.4.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	powerpack	`0.1.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rainbow	`2.2.2`	indirect
RubyGems	rake	`12.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec	`3.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-core	`3.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-expectations	`3.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-mocks	`3.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rspec-support	`3.6.0`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop	`0.49.1`	indirect
RubyGems	rubocop-rspec	`1.15.1`	indirect
RubyGems	ruby-progressbar	`1.8.1`	indirect
RubyGems	sxdg	`1.0.0`	indirect
RubyGems	unicode-display_width	`1.3.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 147 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 25 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
tar	`0.4.45`	direct	moderate	1	`0.4.46`
rake	`12.0.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`12.3.3`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records