Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 16:06 UTC

inveniosoftware / invenio-administration

Invenio administration module.

JavaScript · PythonMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 40 forkssince Jul 2022View on GitHub ↗

inveniosoftware/invenio-administration holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Security (52/100). It was last updated 17 days ago. 4 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Invenio digital repository frameworkOrganization

204 followers171 public repossince Oct 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	invenio-administration	7.1.1	11,071	78	39 days ago	admin administration backoffice invenio

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

75Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

66Good

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 17 days ago
14.5/36	Commit cadence — 21/52 weeks with commits
14.3/18	Commit volume — 38 commits in the last year
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

commits_last_year	38
human_commit_share	0.98
days_since_last_push	17
active_weeks_last_year	21

Release discipline

88Excellent

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 78 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 17 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~18.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	78
latest_release_tag	v6.1.1
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	17
mean_days_between_releases	18.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

23At Risk

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 0 stars
13.3/25	Forks — 40 forks
10.1/15	Watchers — 67 watchers

Inputs used

forks	40
stars	0
watchers	67
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	4
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

67Good

How it's scored

53.9/80	Monthly downloads — 11,071 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	invenio-administration
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	11,071
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

82Excellent

How it's scored

43.2/54	Bus factor — 4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 30% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 23 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	4
contributors_sampled	23
top_contributor_share	0.302

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good

How it's scored

35/42	Issue resolution — 83% of issues closed
27.1/30	PR acceptance — 177/196 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 9/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

merged_prs	177
open_issues	15
closed_issues	75
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	0.833
closed_unmerged_prs	19
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

72Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
16.6/25	Owner reach — 204 followers of inveniosoftware
25/25	Track record — 171 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	204
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	inveniosoftware
public_repos	171
account_age_days	5,433

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 39 days ago
20/20	Version history — 78 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	invenio-administration
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	39

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

90Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .eslintrc.yml, pyproject.toml ([tool.isort])
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

80Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://invenio-administration.readthedocs.io
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://invenio-administration.readthedocs.io
docs_site	https://invenio-administration.readthedocs.io
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5	Code-Review — Found 9/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
6/7.5	Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 12 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	140
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:invenio-administration@7.1.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 140 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 78 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.796
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .eslintrc.yml, pyproject.toml ([tool.isort])
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	docs/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/102 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	14,420
source_files_sampled	102
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

0GitHub stars

23contributors

38commits, last 12 months

17days since last push

78releases

4bus factor

15open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 40 ⇿

0Stars

40Forks

77Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 7Minor 31Patch 39

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 16:05 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4	Code-Review	Found 9/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10	Contributors	project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
8	Maintained	10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	12 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 9

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	flask-menu	`>=0.5.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	flask-principal	`>=0.4.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	invenio-accounts	`>=9.0.0,<10.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	invenio-base	`>=2.3.0,<3.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	invenio-db	`>=2.2.0,<3.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	invenio-i18n	`>=4.0.0,<5.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	invenio-records-resources	`>=11.0.0,<12.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	invenio-search-ui	`>=5.0.0,<6.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	invenio-theme	`>=5.0.0,<6.0.0`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 164

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 155 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	flask-menu	`—`	direct
PyPI	flask-principal	`—`	direct
PyPI	invenio-accounts	`—`	direct
PyPI	invenio-base	`—`	direct
PyPI	invenio-db	`—`	direct
PyPI	invenio-i18n	`—`	direct
PyPI	invenio-records-resources	`—`	direct
PyPI	invenio-search-ui	`—`	direct
PyPI	invenio-theme	`—`	direct
npm	@babel/runtime	`7.20.1`	indirect
npm	@testing-library/jest-dom	`^4.2.0`	indirect
npm	@testing-library/react	`^9.5.0`	indirect
npm	@testing-library/user-event	`^7.2.0`	indirect
npm	acorn	`6.4.2`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.8.1`	indirect
npm	acorn-class-fields	`0.3.7`	indirect
npm	acorn-dynamic-import	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	acorn-private-class-elements	`0.2.7`	indirect
npm	acorn-private-methods	`0.3.3`	indirect
npm	acorn-stage3	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-static-class-features	`0.2.4`	indirect
npm	acorn-walk	`8.2.0`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	append-buffer	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	arrify	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	axios	`^1.7.7`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect
npm	buffer-equal	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	call-bind	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	clone	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	clone-buffer	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	clone-deep	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	clone-stats	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	cloneable-readable	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	commander	`5.1.0`	indirect
npm	commander	`6.2.1`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	content-type	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	convert-source-map	`1.9.0`	indirect
npm	core-util-is	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	coveralls	`^3.0.0`	indirect
npm	deepmerge	`4.2.2`	indirect
npm	define-properties	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	duplexify	`3.7.1`	indirect
npm	encoding	`0.1.13`	indirect
npm	end-of-stream	`1.4.4`	indirect
npm	ensure-array	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	enzyme	`^3.10.0`	indirect
npm	enzyme-adapter-react-16	`^1.15.0`	indirect
npm	eol	`0.9.1`	indirect
npm	esprima-next	`5.8.4`	indirect
npm	expect	`^26.0.0`	indirect
npm	extend	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	flush-write-stream	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	fs-mkdirp-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	gettext-parser	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.2.3`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	glob-stream	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.10`	indirect
npm	gulp-sort	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	has	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-property-descriptors	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	html-parse-stringify	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	i18next	`20.6.1`	indirect
npm	i18next-browser-languagedetector	`6.1.8`	indirect
npm	i18next-conv	`10.2.0`	indirect
npm	i18next-scanner	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.6.3`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-absolute	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-buffer	`1.1.6`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-negated-glob	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-plain-object	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-relative	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-unc-path	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-utf8	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-valid-glob	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-windows	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	isarray	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	isobject	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	kind-of	`6.0.3`	indirect
npm	lazystream	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	lead	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect
npm	lodash	`^4.17.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.get	`4.4.2`	indirect
npm	loose-envify	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	luxon	`^1.23.0`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	node-gettext	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	normalize-path	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	now-and-later	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	object-keys	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	object.assign	`4.1.4`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	ordered-read-streams	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parse5	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-dirname	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	process-nextick-args	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	pump	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	pumpify	`1.5.1`	indirect
npm	react	`18.2.0`	indirect
npm	react	`^16.13.0`	indirect
npm	react-dom	`^16.13.0`	indirect
npm	react-i18next	`11.18.6`	indirect
npm	react-overridable	`^0.0.3`	indirect
npm	react-scripts	`^5.0.1`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`2.3.7`	indirect
npm	readable-stream	`3.6.0`	indirect
npm	regenerator-runtime	`0.13.10`	indirect
npm	remove-bom-buffer	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	remove-bom-stream	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	remove-trailing-separator	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	replace-ext	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	resolve-options	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	semantic-ui-react	`^2.1.0`	indirect
npm	shallow-clone	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	sortobject	`4.16.0`	indirect
npm	stream-shift	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	string_decoder	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	through2	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	through2	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	through2-filter	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	to-absolute-glob	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	to-through	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	unc-path-regex	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	unique-stream	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	util-deprecate	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	value-or-function	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	vinyl	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	vinyl-fs	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	vinyl-sourcemap	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	void-elements	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	xtend	`4.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	invenio-access	`—`	indirect
PyPI	invenio-app	`—`	indirect
PyPI	invenio-search	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-black	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-invenio	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:invenio-administration@7.1.1 pulls in 140 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

More detail

Feedback

Related records