Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-25 05:06 UTC

invoice-x / invoice2data

Extract structured data from PDF invoices

PythonMIT★ 2,219 stars⑂ 557 forkssince Apr 2015View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

invoice-x/invoice2data holds a health index of 94 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (68/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

94
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

94
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 80 is calibrated to 94 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

invoice-xOrganization
28 followers4 public repossince May 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIinvoice2data1.0.115,77510754 days agopythondata-miningaccountinginvoicepdfparcing

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 204 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year204
human_commit_share0.61
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year17
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 10 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 54 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~141.3 days
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 2 out of the last 2 releases have a total of 2 signed artifacts.
Inputs used
releases_count10
latest_release_tagv1.0.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release54
mean_days_between_releases141.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

82Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
54.3/60Stars — 2,219 stars
22.9/25Forks — 557 forks
10/15Watchers — 63 watchers
Inputs used
forks557
stars2,219
watchers63
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
56/80Monthly downloads — 15,775 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesinvoice2data
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads15,775
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 29% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 56 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled56
top_contributor_share0.293
How it's scored
39.4/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
23/30PR acceptance — 357/466 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs357
open_issues18
closed_issues278
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.939
closed_unmerged_prs109
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
10.5/25Owner reach — 28 followers of invoice-x
17.1/25Track record — 4 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers28
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logininvoice-x
public_repos4
account_age_days3,049

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 54 days ago
20/20Version history — 107 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesinvoice2data
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish54

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://invoice2data.readthedocs.io/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspython, data-mining
has_wikino
homepagehttps://invoice2data.readthedocs.io/
docs_sitehttps://invoice2data.readthedocs.io/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
5/5Fuzzing — project is fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
6/7.5Signed-Releases — 2 out of the last 2 releases have a total of 2 signed artifacts.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages5
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:invoice2data@1.0.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 5 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 57 of 61 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.934
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — noxfile.py
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — src/invoice2data/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 39 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesnoxfile.py
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/invoice2data/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.39
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/invoice2data/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/119 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes25,496
source_files_sampled119
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

2,219GitHub stars
56contributors
204commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
10releases
2bus factor
18open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 557 ⇿
0Stars
557Forks
10Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010020030040050060053372015-042020-122026-09
Major 1Minor 1Patch 8

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10
6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-25 05:05 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests28 out of 28 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 4/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
8Signed-Releases2 out of the last 2 releases have a total of 2 signed artifacts.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIclick>=8.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil>= 2.8pyproject.toml
PyPIPyYAML>= 6.0pyproject.toml
PyPIregex>= 2025.2.10pyproject.toml
PyPIregex>= 2024.4.16pyproject.toml
All dependencies 215

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 210 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIclick8.4.1direct
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.2direct
PyPIregex2024.11.6direct
PyPIregex2025.9.18direct
PyPIaistudio-sdk0.3.8indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIannotated-doc0.0.4indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyascii0.3.3indirect
PyPIanyio4.14.2indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.5.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.16.0indirect
PyPIbce-python-sdk0.9.72indirect
PyPIcachetools5.5.0indirect
PyPIcamelot-py2.0.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2024.8.30indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.4.0indirect
PyPIchardet5.2.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcolorlog6.10.1indirect
PyPIcoverage7.6.1indirect
PyPIcrc32c2.8indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIcuda-bindings13.3.1indirect
PyPIcuda-pathfinder1.5.5indirect
PyPIcuda-toolkit13.0.3.0indirect
PyPIdateparser1.2.0indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.2.15indirect
PyPIdeprecation2.1.0indirect
PyPIdistlib0.3.9indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser-fork0.0.9indirect
PyPIdocutils0.20.1indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIet-xmlfile2.0.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.2.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.6.0indirect
PyPIfuture1.0.0indirect
PyPIghostscript0.7indirect
PyPIgoogle-api-core2.23.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.36.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-core2.4.1indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-storage2.18.2indirect
PyPIgoogle-cloud-vision3.8.1indirect
PyPIgoogle-crc32c1.5.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-resumable-media2.7.2indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.66.0indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.68.0indirect
PyPIgrpcio-status1.68.0indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIh5py3.16.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.5.1indirect
PyPIhotpdf0.5.5indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx0.28.1indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub1.20.1indirect
PyPIhypothesis6.164.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.1indirect
PyPIidna3.16indirect
PyPIimagesize1.4.1indirect
PyPIimg2pdf0.5.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.0.0indirect
PyPIinvoice2data1.0.1indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIlangdetect1.0.9indirect
PyPIlibrt0.11.0indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py3.0.0indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe2.1.5indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.4.2indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.6.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPIml-dtypes0.5.4indirect
PyPImodelscope1.37.1indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPImypy2.1.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.0.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser4.0.1indirect
PyPImyst-parser5.1.0indirect
PyPInetworkx3.4.2indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6.1indirect
PyPInodeenv1.9.1indirect
PyPInumpy2.2.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.5.0indirect
PyPInvidia-cublas13.1.1.3indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-cupti13.0.85indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-nvrtc13.0.88indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-runtime13.0.96indirect
PyPInvidia-cudnn-cu139.20.0.48indirect
PyPInvidia-cufft12.0.0.61indirect
PyPInvidia-cufile1.15.1.6indirect
PyPInvidia-curand10.4.0.35indirect
PyPInvidia-cusolver12.0.4.66indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparse12.6.3.3indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparselt-cu130.8.1indirect
PyPInvidia-nccl-cu132.29.7indirect
PyPInvidia-nvjitlink13.3.33indirect
PyPInvidia-nvshmem-cu133.4.5indirect
PyPInvidia-nvtx13.0.85indirect
PyPIocrmypdf14.4.0indirect
PyPIonnx1.22.0indirect
PyPIopencv-contrib-python4.10.0.84indirect
PyPIopencv-python4.13.0.92indirect
PyPIopencv-python-headless4.13.0.92indirect
PyPIopenpyxl3.1.5indirect
PyPIopt-einsum3.3.0indirect
PyPIpackaging24.2indirect
PyPIpaddleocr3.4.1indirect
PyPIpaddlepaddle3.3.1indirect
PyPIpaddlex3.4.3indirect
PyPIpandas2.3.3indirect
PyPIpandas3.0.3indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpdf-oxide0.3.67indirect
PyPIpdfminer-six20231228indirect
PyPIpdfplumber0.11.4indirect
PyPIpikepdf9.2.1indirect
PyPIpillow12.3.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.3.6indirect
PyPIplaya-pdf1.1.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.5.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit3.5.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit-hooks4.6.0indirect
PyPIprettytable3.18.0indirect
PyPIproto-plus1.25.0indirect
PyPIprotobuf5.29.6indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIpy-cpuinfo9.0.0indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.1indirect
PyPIpyclipper1.4.0indirect
PyPIpycparser2.22indirect
PyPIpycryptodome3.23.0indirect
PyPIpydantic2.11.10indirect
PyPIpydantic2.13.4indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.33.2indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpydoclint0.4.2indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpygments-styles0.3.0indirect
PyPIpypdfium24.30.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.14.0indirect
PyPIpython-bidi0.6.10indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.3.1indirect
PyPIpython-doctr1.0.1indirect
PyPIpytz2024.2indirect
PyPIrapidfuzz3.14.5indirect
PyPIreportlab4.2.5indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrich13.9.4indirect
PyPIroman-numerals4.1.0indirect
PyPIrsa4.9indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.18.6indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml-clib0.2.8indirect
PyPIruff0.15.18indirect
PyPIsafetensors0.8.0indirect
PyPIscipy1.15.3indirect
PyPIscipy1.17.1indirect
PyPIscipy1.18.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools82.0.1indirect
PyPIshapely2.1.2indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIshibuya—indirect
PyPIshibuya2026.5.19indirect
PyPIsix1.16.0indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer2.2.0indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIsphinx8.1.3indirect
PyPIsphinx9.0.4indirect
PyPIsphinx9.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild2024.10.3indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild2025.8.25indirect
PyPIsphinx-click6.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-click6.2.0indirect
PyPIsphinx-mermaid0.0.8indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-svg2pdfconverter2.1.0indirect
PyPIstarlette1.3.1indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPItabulate0.10.0indirect
PyPItomli2.1.0indirect
PyPItorch2.13.0indirect
PyPItorchvision0.28.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.0indirect
PyPItriton3.7.1indirect
PyPIty0.0.39indirect
PyPItypeguard4.4.2indirect
PyPItypeguard4.5.2indirect
PyPItyper0.25.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPItzdata2024.2indirect
PyPItzlocal5.2indirect
PyPIujson5.13.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.49.0indirect
PyPIvalidators0.35.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.3.3indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.2.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.1indirect
PyPIwebsockets16.0indirect
PyPIwrapt1.17.0indirect
PyPIxdoctest1.2.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:invoice2data@1.0.1 pulls in 5 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.