Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 00:32 UTC

iron-software / IronSoftware.System.Drawing

An open-source System.Drawing.Common replacement for .NET 5 and above on all platforms. Bringing together System.Drawing, Maui, and ImageSharp's Bitmap, Image, Font, and Shape types via an agnostic free NuGet package.

C#Custom license★ 147 stars⑂ 20 forkssince Jun 2022View on GitHub ↗

iron-software/IronSoftware.System.Drawing holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Security (69/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (33/100). It was last updated 47 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Iron SoftwareOrganization · verified domain
81 followers53 public repossince Aug 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 47 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence19/52 weeks with commits
14.2/18Commit volume37 commits in the last year
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
commits_last_year37
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push47
active_weeks_last_year19
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases55 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 47 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~38 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count55
latest_release_tag2026.8.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release47
mean_days_between_releases38

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
35.1/60Stars147 stars
10.7/25Forks20 forks
4.7/15Watchers8 watchers
Inputs used
forks20
stars147
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 70% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth15 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.699
How it's scored
28/42Issue resolution67% of issues closed
27.9/30PR acceptance121/130 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 7/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs121
open_issues8
closed_issues16
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.667
closed_unmerged_prs9
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
13.8/25Owner reach81 followers of iron-software
24.6/25Track record53 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers81
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginiron-software
public_repos53
account_age_days2,939

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics11 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdotnet, dotnet-core, image-processing, linux, macos, mobile, windows, nuget-package, drawing, font, image
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno data
6/7.5Code-ReviewFound 7/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
6/7.5Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CII-Best-Practices, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages18
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 18 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

33At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.4/40Legible commit history27 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.27
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapIronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.ConsoleTest/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.ConsoleTest.csproj, IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests.csproj, IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsIronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.ConsoleTest/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.ConsoleTest.csproj, IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests.csproj, IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
50.1/55Manageable file sizes3/34 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes171,213
source_files_sampled34
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

147GitHub stars
15contributors
37commits, last 12 months
47days since last push
55releases
1bus factor
8open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 20 ⇿
0Stars
20Forks
42Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216202022022-122024-042025-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 41

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 00:31 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests8 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
n/aCII-Best-Practicesinternal error: error during http.Do: Get "https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects.json?url=https://github.com/iron-software/IronSoftware.System.Drawing": Get "https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects.json?url=https://github.com/iron-software/IronSoftware.System.Drawing": dial tcp: lookup www.bestpractices.dev on 127.0.0.11:53: server misbehaving
8Code-ReviewFound 7/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
8Maintained10 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetFluentAssertions6.10.0IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.5.0IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Graphics7.0.92IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests.csproj
NuGetruntime.osx.10.10-x64.CoreCompat.System.Drawing6.0.5.128IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp2.88.7IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux2.88.7IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common6.0.0IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.4.2IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.4.5IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector3.2.0IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.Tests.csproj
NuGetBitMiracle.LibTiff.NET2.4.649IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Graphics7.0.92IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp2.88.7IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.csproj
NuGetIronSoftware.Drawing.Abstractions2026.1.2IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.csproj
NuGetSkiaSharp.Svg1.60.0IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.csproj
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common6.0.0IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub1.1.1IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.csproj
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp3.1.12IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.csproj
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp.Drawing2.1.7IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.csproj
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp2.1.13IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.csproj
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp.Drawing1.0.0IronSoftware.Drawing/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common/IronSoftware.Drawing.Common.csproj
All dependencies 18

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBitMiracle.LibTiff.NET2.4.649direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector3.2.0direct
NuGetFluentAssertions6.10.0direct
NuGetIronSoftware.Drawing.Abstractions2026.1.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Graphics7.0.92direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.5.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.SourceLink.GitHub1.1.1direct
NuGetruntime.osx.10.10-x64.CoreCompat.System.Drawing6.0.5.128direct
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp2.1.13direct
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp3.1.12direct
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp.Drawing1.0.0direct
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp.Drawing2.1.7direct
NuGetSkiaSharp2.88.7direct
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux2.88.7direct
NuGetSkiaSharp.Svg1.60.0direct
NuGetSystem.Drawing.Common6.0.0direct
NuGetxunit2.4.2direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.4.5direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 18 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.