Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-24 04:13 UTC

iyulab / ironhive

.NET pipeline framework for enterprise AI applications — multi-provider LLM integration, RAG pipelines, and multi-agent orchestration with a fluent builder API.

C#MIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince May 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryMCP serverhow this is determined
#ai-framework#dotnet#llm#multi-agent#pipeline#rag

iyulab/ironhive holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (34/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

iyulabOrganization
23 followers145 public repossince Jul 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetIronHive.Abstractions0.35.0-800 days agoiyulabaillmragagent
NuGetIronHive.Core0.35.0-800 days agoiyulabaillmragagent
NuGetIronHive.Plugins.MCP0.35.0-680 days agoiyulabaillmragagent
NuGetIronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI0.35.0-800 days agoiyulabaillmragagent
NuGetIronHive.Providers.Anthropic0.35.0-800 days agoiyulabaillmragagent
NuGetIronHive.Providers.GoogleAI0.35.0-800 days agoiyulabaillmragagent
NuGetIronHive.Providers.OpenAI.Compatible0.35.0-750 days agoiyulabaillmragagent
NuGetIronHive.Providers.OpenAI0.35.0-800 days agoiyulabaillmragagent

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

88Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
24.2/36Commit cadence — 35/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 332 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year332
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year35

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 41 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count41
latest_release_tagv0.29.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases0.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

34At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

65Good
How it's scored
52.1/80Total downloads — 104,344 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesIronHive.Abstractions, IronHive.Core, IronHive.Plugins.MCP, IronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI, IronHive.Providers.Anthropic, IronHive.Providers.GoogleAI, IronHive.Providers.OpenAI.Compatible, IronHive.Providers.OpenAI
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads104,344
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

49Weak
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 45% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.451

Issue & PR responsiveness

48Weak
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance — 0/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

65Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.9/25Owner reach — 23 followers of iyulab
25/25Track record — 145 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers23
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginiyulab
public_repos145
account_age_days2,642

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 80 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesIronHive.Abstractions, IronHive.Core, IronHive.Plugins.MCP, IronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI, IronHive.Providers.Anthropic, IronHive.Providers.GoogleAI, IronHive.Providers.OpenAI.Compatible, IronHive.Providers.OpenAI
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

75Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-framework, dotnet, llm, multi-agent, pipeline, rag
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

49Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

78Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — docs/AGENTS.md, docs/research/Agent.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_filesdocs/AGENTS.md, docs/research/Agent.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes8,648

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

56Moderate
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — samples/ConsoleApp/ConsoleApp.csproj, samples/WebApp/WebApp.csproj, src/IronHive.Abstractions/IronHive.Abstractions.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 15 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.15
toolchain_manifestssamples/ConsoleApp/ConsoleApp.csproj, samples/WebApp/WebApp.csproj, src/IronHive.Abstractions/IronHive.Abstractions.csproj, src/IronHive.Core/IronHive.Core.csproj, src/IronHive.Plugins.MCP/IronHive.Plugins.MCP.csproj, src/IronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI/IronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI.csproj, src/IronHive.Providers.Anthropic/IronHive.Providers.Anthropic.csproj, src/IronHive.Providers.GoogleAI/IronHive.Providers.GoogleAI.csproj, src/IronHive.Providers.OpenAI.Compatible/IronHive.Providers.OpenAI.Compatible.csproj, src/IronHive.Providers.OpenAI/IronHive.Providers.OpenAI.csproj, src/IronHive.Storages.Amazon/IronHive.Storages.Amazon.csproj, src/IronHive.Storages.Azure/IronHive.Storages.Azure.csproj, src/IronHive.Storages.Qdrant/IronHive.Storages.Qdrant.csproj, src/IronHive.Storages.RabbitMQ/IronHive.Storages.RabbitMQ.csproj, tests/IronHive.DocSnippets.Tests/IronHive.DocSnippets.Tests.csproj, tests/IronHive.Tests/IronHive.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/453 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes74,665
source_files_sampled453
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
4contributors
332commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
41releases
2bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-24 04:12 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 31
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions—src/IronHive.Abstractions/IronHive.Abstractions.csproj
NuGetDocumentFormat.OpenXml—src/IronHive.Core/IronHive.Core.csproj
NuGetHtmlAgilityPack—src/IronHive.Core/IronHive.Core.csproj
NuGetMessagePack—src/IronHive.Core/IronHive.Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite—src/IronHive.Core/IronHive.Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.AI.Abstractions—src/IronHive.Core/IronHive.Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection—src/IronHive.Core/IronHive.Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Resilience—src/IronHive.Core/IronHive.Core.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Api—src/IronHive.Core/IronHive.Core.csproj
NuGetPdfPig—src/IronHive.Core/IronHive.Core.csproj
NuGetScriban—src/IronHive.Core/IronHive.Core.csproj
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.bundle_e_sqlite3—src/IronHive.Core/IronHive.Core.csproj
NuGetTomlyn—src/IronHive.Core/IronHive.Core.csproj
NuGetYamlDotNet—src/IronHive.Core/IronHive.Core.csproj
NuGetModelContextProtocol—src/IronHive.Plugins.MCP/IronHive.Plugins.MCP.csproj
NuGetJsonSchema.Net—src/IronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI/IronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI.csproj
NuGetJsonSchema.Net.Generation—src/IronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI/IronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http—src/IronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI/IronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.OpenApi—src/IronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI/IronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.OpenApi.YamlReader—src/IronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI/IronHive.Plugins.OpenAPI.csproj
NuGetAnthropic—src/IronHive.Providers.Anthropic/IronHive.Providers.Anthropic.csproj
NuGetGoogle.GenAI—src/IronHive.Providers.GoogleAI/IronHive.Providers.GoogleAI.csproj
NuGetOpenAI—src/IronHive.Providers.OpenAI/IronHive.Providers.OpenAI.csproj
NuGetTiktoken—src/IronHive.Providers.OpenAI/IronHive.Providers.OpenAI.csproj
NuGetAWSSDK.S3—src/IronHive.Storages.Amazon/IronHive.Storages.Amazon.csproj
NuGetAzure.Identity—src/IronHive.Storages.Azure/IronHive.Storages.Azure.csproj
NuGetAzure.Storage.Blobs—src/IronHive.Storages.Azure/IronHive.Storages.Azure.csproj
NuGetAzure.Storage.Files.Shares—src/IronHive.Storages.Azure/IronHive.Storages.Azure.csproj
NuGetQdrant.Client—src/IronHive.Storages.Qdrant/IronHive.Storages.Qdrant.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions—src/IronHive.Storages.RabbitMQ/IronHive.Storages.RabbitMQ.csproj
NuGetRabbitMQ.Client—src/IronHive.Storages.RabbitMQ/IronHive.Storages.RabbitMQ.csproj
All dependencies 42

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 31 direct and 11 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAnthropic—direct
NuGetAWSSDK.S3—direct
NuGetAzure.Identity—direct
NuGetAzure.Storage.Blobs—direct
NuGetAzure.Storage.Files.Shares—direct
NuGetDocumentFormat.OpenXml—direct
NuGetGoogle.GenAI—direct
NuGetHtmlAgilityPack—direct
NuGetJsonSchema.Net—direct
NuGetJsonSchema.Net.Generation—direct
NuGetMessagePack—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Data.Sqlite—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.AI.Abstractions—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Http—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Resilience—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.OpenApi—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.OpenApi.YamlReader—direct
NuGetModelContextProtocol—direct
NuGetOpenAI—direct
NuGetOpenTelemetry.Api—direct
NuGetPdfPig—direct
NuGetQdrant.Client—direct
NuGetRabbitMQ.Client—direct
NuGetScriban—direct
NuGetSQLitePCLRaw.bundle_e_sqlite3—direct
NuGetTiktoken—direct
NuGettomlyn—direct
NuGetYamlDotNet—direct
NuGetAwesomeAssertions—indirect
NuGetdotenv.net—indirect
NuGetIyu.Conventions.Testing—indirect
NuGetMarkdig—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.AI.OpenAI—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.HangDump—indirect
NuGetModelContextProtocol.AspNetCore—indirect
NuGetNSubstitute—indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—indirect
NuGetxunit.v3—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with iyulab/ironhive. Read them side by side →

98ModelEngine-Group/nexentNexent is a zero-code platform for auto-generating production-grade AI agents using Harness Engineering principles — unified tools, skills, memory, and orchestration with built-in constraints, feedback loops, and control planes.Exceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional99ag2ai/ag2AG2 (formerly AutoGen): The Open-Source AgentOS.Join us at: https://discord.gg/sNGSwQME3xExceptional99google/adk-pythonAn open-source, code-first Python toolkit for building, evaluating, and deploying sophisticated AI agents with flexibility and control.Exceptional98bytedance/deer-flowAn open-source long-horizon SuperAgent harness that researches, codes, and creates. With the help of sandboxes, memories, tools, skill, subagents and message gateway, it handles different levels of tasks that could take minutes to hours.Exceptional96agentscope-ai/agentscopeBuild and run agents you can see, understand and trust.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.