Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-05 04:36 UTC

jbg / eredu

a Rust runtime for local language models

RustApache-2.0★ 3 stars⑂ 1 forksince May 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

jbg/eredu holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (37/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

JasperPersonal account
49 followers175 public repossince Dec 2008

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioeredu0.1.0613 days agodeep-learningmachine-learningmlxscience
crates.iosafemlx0.2.216,46572 days agodeep-learningmachine-learningmlxscience
crates.ioeredu-nn0.1.01213 days ago—
crates.ioeredu-cli0.1.1822 days agodeep-learningmachine-learningmlxscience
crates.ioeredu-core0.1.01213 days ago—
crates.ioeredu-gguf0.1.01413 days ago—
crates.ioeredu-text0.1.0813 days agodeep-learningmachine-learningmlxscience
crates.ioeredu-codec0.1.0613 days agodeep-learningmachine-learningmlxscience

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

44Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

72Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,164 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,164
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

37Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

5Critical
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars3
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

70Good
How it's scored
56.2/80Monthly downloads — 16,531 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageseredu, safemlx, eredu-nn, eredu-cli, eredu-core, eredu-gguf, eredu-text, eredu-codec
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads49,592
monthly_downloads16,531
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

12Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.999

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 3/3 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs3
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

59Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
12.2/25Owner reach — 49 followers of jbg
25/25Track record — 175 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers49
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginjbg
public_repos175
account_age_days6,476
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 8 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history — 7 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageseredu, safemlx, eredu-nn, eredu-cli, eredu-core, eredu-gguf, eredu-text, eredu-codec
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), eredu-architectures/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-backend-mlx-macros/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-checkpoint/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-cli/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-codec/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-core/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-evaluation/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-gguf/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-nn-macros/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-nn/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-runtime/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-text/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu/Cargo.toml ([lints]), safemlx-internal-macros/Cargo.toml ([lints]), safemlx-tests/Cargo.toml ([lints])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/safemlx
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/safemlx
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

47Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

48Weak
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
2.7/40Legible commit history — 5 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.05
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,665

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

75Good
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — safemlx-sys/src/mlx-c/docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), eredu-architectures/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-backend-mlx-macros/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-checkpoint/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-cli/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-codec/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-core/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-evaluation/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-gguf/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-nn-macros/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-nn/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-runtime/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu-text/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eredu/Cargo.toml ([lints]), safemlx-internal-macros/Cargo.toml ([lints]), safemlx-tests/Cargo.toml ([lints])
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filessafemlx-sys/src/mlx-c/docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, eredu-architectures/Cargo.toml, eredu-backend-mlx-macros/Cargo.toml, eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml, eredu-checkpoint/Cargo.toml, eredu-cli/Cargo.toml, eredu-codec/Cargo.toml, eredu-core/Cargo.toml, eredu-evaluation/Cargo.toml, eredu-gguf/Cargo.toml, eredu-nn-macros/Cargo.toml, eredu-nn/Cargo.toml, eredu-runtime/Cargo.toml, eredu-text/Cargo.toml, eredu/Cargo.toml, examples/eredu-ios/native/Cargo.toml, safemlx-internal-macros/Cargo.toml, safemlx-sys/Cargo.toml, safemlx-tests/Cargo.toml, safemlx/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

93Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
48/55Manageable file sizes — 81/634 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes1,010,171
source_files_sampled634
oversized_source_files81

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3GitHub stars
2contributors
1,164commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10
4.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-05 04:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 119
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioeredu-checkpoint—eredu-architectures/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-core—eredu-architectures/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-gguf—eredu-architectures/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-nn—eredu-architectures/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-runtime—eredu-architectures/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—eredu-architectures/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—eredu-architectures/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—eredu-architectures/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—eredu-architectures/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn—eredu-backend-mlx-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote—eredu-backend-mlx-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro2—eredu-backend-mlx-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-core—eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-checkpoint—eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-nn—eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-runtime—eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-architectures—eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-gguf—eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-codec—eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iosafemlx—eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-backend-mlx-macros—eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iosafetensors0.8eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iohalf—eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ioimage0.25eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustfft6eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallvec1eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ioref-cast1eredu-backend-mlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-gguf—eredu-checkpoint/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—eredu-checkpoint/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—eredu-checkpoint/Cargo.toml
crates.iosafetensors0.8eredu-checkpoint/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—eredu-checkpoint/Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow—eredu-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap—eredu-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.iohf-cache-reader=0.1.0eredu-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu—eredu-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-checkpoint—eredu-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-core—eredu-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-runtime—eredu-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—eredu-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—eredu-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-checkpoint—eredu-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-nn—eredu-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—eredu-codec/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—eredu-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—eredu-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—eredu-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—eredu-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-gguf—eredu-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-checkpoint—eredu-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-architectures—eredu-evaluation/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-codec—eredu-evaluation/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-core—eredu-evaluation/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-nn—eredu-evaluation/Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4eredu-evaluation/Cargo.toml
crates.iosafetensors0.8eredu-evaluation/Cargo.toml
crates.iosentencepiece-rs0.2.2eredu-evaluation/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—eredu-evaluation/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—eredu-evaluation/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—eredu-evaluation/Cargo.toml
crates.iohalf—eredu-gguf/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—eredu-gguf/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro2—eredu-nn-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote—eredu-nn-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn—eredu-nn-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-checkpoint—eredu-nn/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-nn-macros—eredu-nn/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—eredu-nn/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-checkpoint—eredu-runtime/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-core—eredu-runtime/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-nn—eredu-runtime/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—eredu-runtime/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—eredu-runtime/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—eredu-runtime/Cargo.toml
crates.iosafetensors0.8eredu-runtime/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—eredu-runtime/Cargo.toml
crates.iobase640.22eredu-text/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4eredu-text/Cargo.toml
crates.iominijinja2.24eredu-text/Cargo.toml
crates.iominijinja-contrib2.24eredu-text/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1eredu-text/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1eredu-text/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—eredu-text/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2eredu-text/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokenizers0.23eredu-text/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-gguf—eredu-text/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-backend-mlx—eredu/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-core—eredu/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-text—eredu/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-gguf—eredu/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-runtime—eredu/Cargo.toml
crates.ioeredu-architectures—eredu/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1eredu/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokenizers0.23eredu/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror2eredu/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1eredu/Cargo.toml
crates.iosha2—eredu/Cargo.toml
crates.iollguidance=1.7.6eredu/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn—safemlx-internal-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote—safemlx-internal-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro2—safemlx-internal-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools—safemlx-internal-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iosafemlx-sys—safemlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iosafemlx-internal-macros—safemlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iohalf2safemlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-complex0.4safemlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum_enum0.7safemlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits0.2safemlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste1safemlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallvec1safemlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iostrum0.28safemlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—safemlx/Cargo.toml
crates.ioparking_lot0.12safemlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iosafetensors0.8safemlx/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytemuck1safemlx/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with jbg/eredu. Read them side by side →

97modelscope/modelscopeModelScope: bring the notion of Model-as-a-Service to life.Exceptional94tracel-ai/burnBurn is a next generation tensor library and Deep Learning Framework that doesn't compromise on flexibility, efficiency and portability.Exceptional100wandb/wandbThe AI developer platform. Use Weights & Biases to train and fine-tune models, and manage models from experimentation to production.Exceptional100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional97lance-format/lanceOpen Lakehouse Format for Multimodal AI. Convert from Parquet in 2 lines of code for 100x faster random access, vector index, and data versioning. Compatible with Pandas, DuckDB, Polars, Pyarrow, and PyTorch with more integrations coming..Exceptional94pykeio/ortFast ML inference & training for ONNX models in RustExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.