Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 15:31 UTC

jolicode / automapper

:rocket: Very FAST :rocket: PHP AutoMapper with on the fly code generation

PHPMIT★ 217 stars⑂ 26 forkssince Sep 2023View on GitHub ↗

jolicode/automapper holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (35/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

JoliCodeOrganization
140 followers99 public repossince Feb 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistjolicode/automapper10.2.024,8062981 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume122 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained11 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year122
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year21

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases29 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 81 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~36.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count29
latest_release_tag10.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release81
mean_days_between_releases36.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
37.9/60Stars217 stars
11.7/25Forks26 forks
6.2/15Watchers14 watchers
Inputs used
forks26
stars217
watchers14
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
58.6/80Monthly downloads24,806 downloads/month across packagist
7.6/20Registry dependents13 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesjolicode/automapper
dependents13
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads542,727
monthly_downloads24,806
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 44% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth22 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 19 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled22
top_contributor_share0.437
How it's scored
41.5/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
27/30PR acceptance234/260 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 8/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs234
open_issues1
closed_issues84
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.988
closed_unmerged_prs26
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
15.5/25Owner reach140 followers of jolicode
25/25Track record99 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers140
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginjolicode
public_repos99
account_age_days5,267
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 81 days ago
20/20Version history29 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesjolicode/automapper
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish81

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://automapper.jolicode.com/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsast, automapper, php, hacktoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://automapper.jolicode.com/
docs_sitehttps://automapper.jolicode.com/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

43Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 8/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained11 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

35Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock, poetry.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
54.9/55Manageable file sizes1/520 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes144,846
source_files_sampled520
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

217GitHub stars
22contributors
122commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
29releases
2bus factor
1open issues
Packagist, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch packagist package 'automapper/bench' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'automapper-doc' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 15:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 8/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained11 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities24 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 14
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistnikic/php-parser^5.6composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts^3.6composer.json
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/expression-language^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/lock^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/property-info^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/property-access^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/type-info^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
PyPImkdocs^1.5.3pyproject.toml
PyPImkdocs-material^9.5.13pyproject.toml
PyPImarkdown-callouts^0.4.0pyproject.toml
PyPImkdocs-literate-nav^0.6.1pyproject.toml
PyPImike^2.0.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 96

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 81 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistnikic/php-parserdirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injectiondirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contractsdirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.4.0direct
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcherdirect
Packagistsymfony/expression-languagedirect
Packagistsymfony/lockdirect
Packagistsymfony/property-accessdirect
Packagistsymfony/property-infodirect
Packagistsymfony/type-infodirect
PyPImarkdown-callouts0.4.0direct
PyPImike2.0.0direct
PyPImkdocs1.5.3direct
PyPImkdocs-literate-nav0.6.1direct
PyPImkdocs-material9.5.13direct
Packagistapi-platform/coreindirect
Packagistcomposer-runtime-apiindirect
Packagistdoctrine/annotations2.0.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/collectionsindirect
Packagistdoctrine/doctrine-bundleindirect
Packagistdoctrine/inflectorindirect
Packagistdoctrine/lexer3.0.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/ormindirect
Packagistmatthiasnoback/symfony-dependency-injection-testindirect
Packagistmoneyphp/moneyindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpbench/container2.2.2indirect
Packagistphpbench/dom0.3.3indirect
Packagistphpbench/phpbench1.2.15indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolverindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parserindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistpsr/cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.0indirect
Packagistseld/jsonlint1.10.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/browser-kitindirect
Packagistsymfony/consoleindirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.0.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystemindirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem7.0.3indirect
Packagistsymfony/finderindirect
Packagistsymfony/finder7.0.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundleindirect
Packagistsymfony/http-clientindirect
Packagistsymfony/http-kernelindirect
Packagistsymfony/object-mapperindirect
Packagistsymfony/options-resolver7.0.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/phpunit-bridgeindirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.29.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.29.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.29.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.29.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/process7.0.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/serializerindirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.4.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/stopwatchindirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.0.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/twig-bundleindirect
Packagistsymfony/uidindirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumperindirect
Packagistsymfony/web-profiler-bundleindirect
Packagistsymfony/yamlindirect
Packagistwebmozart/glob4.7.0indirect
Packagistwilldurand/negotiationindirect
PyPIbabel2.14.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2024.2.2indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.3.2indirect
PyPIclick8.1.7indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIidna3.6indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata7.1.0indirect
PyPIimportlib-resources6.4.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.3indirect
PyPImarkdown3.6indirect
PyPImarkupsafe2.1.5indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPIpackaging24.0indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.6indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.2.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.17.2indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions10.7.1indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.1.2indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag0.1indirect
PyPIregex2023.12.25indirect
PyPIrequests2.31.0indirect
PyPIsix1.16.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.2.1indirect
PyPIverspec0.1.0indirect
PyPIwatchdog4.0.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.18.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.