Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-07 00:18 UTC

kameleo-io / kameleo

Anti-detect browser for web scraping and automation. Engine-level fingerprint masking for Chromium and Firefox. Self-hosted, Docker-ready. Integrates with Selenium, Playwright, and Puppeteer via SDKs in Python, JavaScript, and C#.

C# · Python · TypeScriptNo license detected★ 208 stars⑂ 30 forkssince Aug 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

kameleo-io/kameleo holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (93/100) and lowest on Security (21/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

KameleoOrganization
43 followers1 public reposince Mar 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
16.6/18Commit volume — 70 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year70
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year29

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 12 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 6 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~20.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count12
latest_release_tag5.3.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release6
mean_days_between_releases20.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
37.6/60Stars — 208 stars
12.2/25Forks — 30 forks
4.7/15Watchers — 8 watchers
Inputs used
forks30
stars208
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
69.7/80Monthly downloads — 167,414 downloads/month across npm, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageskameleo.local_api_client, @kameleo/local-api-client
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads167,414
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 89% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.89
How it's scored
38.2/42Issue resolution — 91% of issues closed
26/30PR acceptance — 59/68 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs59
open_issues1
closed_issues10
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d11
prs_decided_30d12
issue_closed_ratio0.909
closed_unmerged_prs9
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.8/25Owner reach — 43 followers of kameleo-io
14.2/25Track record — 1 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers43
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginkameleo-io
public_repos1
account_age_days2,398

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on npm, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 36 days ago
20/20Version history — 22 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageskameleo.local_api_client, @kameleo/local-api-client
ecosystemsnpm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish36

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

93Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs, sdk/python/pyproject.toml ([tool.pylint]), sdk/python/setup.cfg ([flake8]), tox.ini
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://kameleo.io
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 18 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicskameleo, bot, crawler, scraper, proxies, scraping, selenium, puppeteer, automation, stealth, webdriver, browser-fingerprint, chrome, firefox, anti-bot, antidetect-browser, playwright, webscraping
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://kameleo.io
docs_sitehttps://kameleo.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

21At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilespackage-lock.json
manifestsmasking-report/package.json
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages8
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:kameleo.local_api_client@5.2.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 8 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
35.7/40Legible commit history — 67 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.67
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — sdk/csharp/examples/automate_mobile_profiles_on_desktop/AutomateMobileProfilesOnDesktop.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/basic_profile_operations/BasicProfileOperations.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/clean_workspace/CleanWorkspace.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs, sdk/python/pyproject.toml ([tool.pylint]), sdk/python/setup.cfg ([flake8]), tox.ini
11/11Static type checking — masking-report/tsconfig.json, sdk/python/kameleo/local_api_client/py.typed, sdk/typescript/examples/tsconfig.json, sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsmasking-report/tsconfig.json, sdk/python/kameleo/local_api_client/py.typed, sdk/typescript/examples/tsconfig.json, sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssdk/csharp/examples/automate_mobile_profiles_on_desktop/AutomateMobileProfilesOnDesktop.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/basic_profile_operations/BasicProfileOperations.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/clean_workspace/CleanWorkspace.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/connect_with_playwright_to_chrome/ConnectWithPlaywrightToChrome.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/connect_with_playwright_to_firefox/ConnectWithPlaywrightToFirefox.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/connect_with_puppeteer/ConnectWithPuppeteer.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/connect_with_selenium/ConnectWithSelenium.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/cookie_robot/CookieRobot.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/file_upload_with_selenium/FileUploadWithSelenium.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/kernel_operations/KernelOperations.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/manage_cookies/ManageCookies.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/modify_network_request_response_with_playwright/ModifyNetworkRequestResponseWithPlaywright.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/modify_request_response_with_selenium/ModifyRequestResponseWithSelenium.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/playwright_advanced_features/PlaywrightAdvancedFeatures.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/profile_export_import/ProfileExportImport.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/start_browser_with_additional_options/StartBrowserWithAdditionalOptions.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/start_with_proxy/StartWithProxy.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/take_screenshot_with_puppeteer/TakeScreenshotWithPuppeteer.csproj, sdk/csharp/examples/upgrade_profile/UpgradeProfile.csproj, sdk/csharp/src/Kameleo.LocalApiClient/Kameleo.LocalApiClient.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.4/55Manageable file sizes — 4/361 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes166,022
source_files_sampled361
oversized_source_files4
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — docs/static/swagger.json
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesdocs/static/swagger.json
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

208GitHub stars
5contributors
70commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
12releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'masking-report' from its registry
  • npm package 'cloud' points at a different repository (https://github.com/virtkick/cloud); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 30 ⇿
0Stars
30Forks
8Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0510152025303072021-122024-042026-08
Major 1Minor 4Patch 3

Each point covers 5 days.

Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@kameleo/local-api-client^5.2.0masking-report/package.json
npmdotenv^17.4.2masking-report/package.json
npmtslib^2.8.1masking-report/package.json
npm@kameleo/local-api-client^x.x.xarticles/click-the-cloudflare-turnstile/package.json
npm@u4/opencv4nodejs^6.5.3articles/click-the-cloudflare-turnstile/package.json
npmghost-cursor-playwright^2.1.0articles/click-the-cloudflare-turnstile/package.json
npmplaywright^1.37.0articles/click-the-cloudflare-turnstile/package.json
PyPIurllib3>= 1.25.3, < 3.0.0sdk/python/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil>= 2.8.2sdk/python/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic>= 2sdk/python/pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions>= 4.7.1sdk/python/pyproject.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:kameleo.local_api_client@5.2.0 pulls in 8 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI, npm.