Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 07:08 UTC

ktbyers / netmiko

Multi-vendor library to simplify Paramiko SSH connections to network devices

PythonMIT★ 4,285 stars⑂ 1,389 forkssince Nov 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

ktbyers/netmiko holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (84/100) and lowest on Security (57/100). It was last updated 28 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Kirk ByersPersonal account
2,577 followers142 public repossince Jul 2011Twin Bridges Technology

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPInetmiko4.7.0-47126 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 28 days ago
18/36Commit cadence — 26/52 weeks with commits
17.7/18Commit volume — 93 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year93
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push28
active_weeks_last_year26

Release discipline

74Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 45 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 126 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~167.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count45
latest_release_tagv4.7.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release126
mean_days_between_releases167.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

84Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

97Exceptional
How it's scored
58.9/60Stars — 4,285 stars
25/25Forks — 1,389 forks
12.7/15Watchers — 196 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,389
stars4,285
watchers196
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

70Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

37Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 81% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.813

Issue & PR responsiveness

71Good
How it's scored
40.8/42Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
19.9/30PR acceptance — 1,020/1,535 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs1,020
open_issues61
closed_issues2,109
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.972
closed_unmerged_prs515
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

74Good
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
24.5/25Owner reach — 2,577 followers of ktbyers
25/25Track record — 142 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,577
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginktbyers
public_repos142
account_age_days5,550
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 126 days ago
20/20Version history — 47 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnetmiko
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish126

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

50Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 10 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
2/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 33 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

87Excellent
How it's scored
25.5/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: paramiko 4.0.0 (low 3.4)
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
36.9/40No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 133 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages1
assessed_packages17
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitylow 1
direct_affected_packages1
Matched the pypi:netmiko@4.7.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 17 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 95 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.95
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

68Good
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checking — netmiko/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 43 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsnetmiko/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.43
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (netmiko/py.typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 1/348 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes100,335
source_files_sampled348
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

4,285GitHub stars
100contributors
93commits, last 12 months
28days since last push
45releases
1bus factor
61open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • pypi download statistics for 'netmiko' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,389 ⇿
0Stars
1,389Forks
22Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

2004006008001,0001,2001,4001,389112019-012022-112026-09
Major 2Minor 12Patch 8

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10
5.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-16 07:07 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests26 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained10 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities33 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIparamiko>=3.5.0,<5.0pyproject.toml
PyPIscp>=0.13.6pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml>=6.0.2pyproject.toml
PyPItextfsm>=1.1.3pyproject.toml
PyPIntc-templates>=3.1.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyserial>=3.3pyproject.toml
PyPIrich>=13.8pyproject.toml
All dependencies 210

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 203 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIntc-templates9.1.0direct
PyPIparamiko4.0.0direct
PyPIpyserial3.5direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIrich15.0.0direct
PyPIscp0.15.0direct
PyPItextfsm2.1.0direct
PyPIaiofiles25.1.0indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.2indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.13.5indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.14.1indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIasync-lru2.3.0indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIasyncssh2.23.0indirect
PyPIasyncssh2.23.1indirect
PyPIattrs26.1.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbandit1.9.4indirect
PyPIbcrypt5.0.0indirect
PyPIbidict0.23.1indirect
PyPIboolean-py5.0indirect
PyPIcachecontrol0.14.4indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.4.22indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIchardet4.0.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.7indirect
PyPIciscoisesdk2.4.1indirect
PyPIciscoisesdk2.4.4indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.14.0indirect
PyPIcoverage7.14.2indirect
PyPIcryptography48.0.0indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIcyclonedx-python-lib11.11.0indirect
PyPIdefusedxml0.7.1indirect
PyPIdict2xml1.7.8indirect
PyPIdill0.4.1indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIf5-icontrol-rest1.3.13indirect
PyPIfastjsonschema2.21.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.4indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.8.0indirect
PyPIgenie26.3indirect
PyPIgenie-libs-clean26.3indirect
PyPIgenie-libs-conf26.3indirect
PyPIgenie-libs-filetransferutils26.3indirect
PyPIgenie-libs-health26.3indirect
PyPIgenie-libs-ops26.3indirect
PyPIgenie-libs-parser26.3indirect
PyPIgenie-libs-sdk26.3indirect
PyPIgitdb4.0.12indirect
PyPIgitpython3.1.50indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.80.0indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.81.1indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIid1.6.1indirect
PyPIidna3.14indirect
PyPIidna3.18indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata9.0.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIinvoke3.0.3indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.5.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja2—indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjsonpickle4.1.1indirect
PyPIjsonpickle4.1.2indirect
PyPIjunit-xml1.9indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.11.0indirect
PyPIlicense-expression30.4.4indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.0indirect
PyPIlxml6.1.1indirect
PyPImako1.3.12indirect
PyPImarkdown3.10.2indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.0.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0indirect
PyPImsgpack1.2.1indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.0.0indirect
PyPIncclient0.7.1indirect
PyPInetaddr1.3.0indirect
PyPInetmiko4.7.0indirect
PyPInh30.3.5indirect
PyPInh30.3.6indirect
PyPIpackageurl-python0.17.6indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpdoc30.11.6indirect
PyPIpip26.1.2indirect
PyPIpip-api0.0.34indirect
PyPIpip-audit2.10.1indirect
PyPIpip-requirements-parser32.0.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIply3.11indirect
PyPIprettytable3.17.0indirect
PyPIprettytable3.18.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIprotobuf7.34.1indirect
PyPIprotobuf7.35.1indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.2indirect
PyPIpy-serializable2.1.0indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.0indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpyasynchat1.0.5indirect
PyPIpyasyncore1.0.5indirect
PyPIpyats26.3indirect
PyPIpyats26.5indirect
PyPIpyats-aereport26.3indirect
PyPIpyats-aereport26.5indirect
PyPIpyats-aetest26.3indirect
PyPIpyats-aetest26.5indirect
PyPIpyats-async26.3indirect
PyPIpyats-async26.5indirect
PyPIpyats-connections26.3indirect
PyPIpyats-connections26.5indirect
PyPIpyats-datastructures26.3indirect
PyPIpyats-datastructures26.5indirect
PyPIpyats-easypy26.3indirect
PyPIpyats-easypy26.5indirect
PyPIpyats-kleenex26.3indirect
PyPIpyats-kleenex26.5indirect
PyPIpyats-log26.3indirect
PyPIpyats-log26.5indirect
PyPIpyats-reporter26.3indirect
PyPIpyats-reporter26.5indirect
PyPIpyats-results26.3indirect
PyPIpyats-results26.5indirect
PyPIpyats-tcl26.3indirect
PyPIpyats-tcl26.5indirect
PyPIpyats-topology26.3indirect
PyPIpyats-topology26.5indirect
PyPIpyats-utils26.3indirect
PyPIpyats-utils26.5indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpyftpdlib2.2.0indirect
PyPIpygal—indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpynacl1.6.2indirect
PyPIpyparsing3.3.2indirect
PyPIpysmi1.6.3indirect
PyPIpysnmp6.1.4indirect
PyPIpysnmpcrypto0.0.4indirect
PyPIpytest8.3.3indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov4.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-engineio4.9.1indirect
PyPIpython-socketio5.11.2indirect
PyPIpyvmomi9.1.0.0indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer44.0indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer45.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.0indirect
PyPIrequests2.34.2indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrest-connector26.3indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.19.1indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml-clib0.2.14indirect
PyPIruff0.15.5indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools79.0.1indirect
PyPIsimple-websocket1.1.0indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsmmap5.0.3indirect
PyPIsortedcontainers2.4.0indirect
PyPIstevedore5.8.0indirect
PyPItftpy0.8.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.3indirect
PyPItqdm4.68.3indirect
PyPIttp0.10.1indirect
PyPItwine6.2.0indirect
PyPItypes-paramiko4.0.0.20250822indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20250915indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPIunicon26.3indirect
PyPIunicon26.5indirect
PyPIunicon-plugins26.3indirect
PyPIunicon-plugins26.5indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.7.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.1indirect
PyPIwhatever—indirect
PyPIwheel0.47.0indirect
PyPIwsproto1.3.2indirect
PyPIxmltodict0.12.0indirect
PyPIxmltodict1.0.2indirect
PyPIyamllint1.37.1indirect
PyPIyamllint1.38.0indirect
PyPIyang-connector26.3indirect
PyPIyarl1.23.0indirect
PyPIyarl1.24.2indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.1indirect
PyPIzipp4.1.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing pypi:netmiko@4.7.0 pulls in 17 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
paramiko4.0.0directlow2—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with ktbyers/netmiko. Read them side by side →

100NVIDIA-NeMo/SpeechA scalable generative AI framework built for researchers and developers working on Large Language Models, Multimodal, and Speech AI (Automatic Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech)Exceptional100open-telemetry/opentelemetry-pythonOpenTelemetry Python API and SDK Exceptional100envoyproxy/envoyCloud-native high-performance edge/middle/service proxyExceptional100home-assistant/frontend:lollipop: Frontend for Home AssistantExceptional100PrefectHQ/prefectPrefect is a workflow orchestration framework for building resilient data pipelines in Python.Exceptional100aws/aws-sam-cliCLI tool to build, test, debug, and deploy Serverless applications using AWS SAMExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.