Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 13:25 UTC

lfnovo / esperanto

A unified interface for various AI model providers

PythonMIT★ 212 stars⑂ 50 forkssince Nov 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#anthropic#embeddings#gemini#langchain#language-model#openai

lfnovo/esperanto holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Security (52/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Luis NovoPersonal account
1,555 followers39 public repossince Jan 2011Supernova Labs

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIesperanto2.27.047,4091025 days agoaianthropicdeepseekelevenlabsgeminigooglegroqllmmistralopenaiopenrouterspeech-to-texttext-to-speechtransformersx.ai

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

84Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 196 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 26 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year196
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year29

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 68 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~19.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count68
latest_release_tagv2.27.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases19.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

54Moderate
How it's scored
37.7/60Stars — 212 stars
14.1/25Forks — 50 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks50
stars212
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

77Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

78Good
How it's scored
62.3/80Monthly downloads — 47,409 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesesperanto
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads47,409
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

63Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

30At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 91% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 11 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled11
top_contributor_share0.913

Issue & PR responsiveness

64Moderate
How it's scored
32.4/42Issue resolution — 77% of issues closed
26.8/30PR acceptance — 152/170 decided PRs merged
5.2/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/5 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs152
open_issues26
closed_issues88
prs_merged_7d9
prs_decided_7d13
prs_merged_30d9
prs_decided_30d13
issue_closed_ratio0.772
closed_unmerged_prs18
first_time_authors_30d5
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d5

Ownership & stewardship

71Good
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
22.9/25Owner reach — 1,555 followers of lfnovo
23.7/25Track record — 39 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,555
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginlfnovo
public_repos39
account_age_days5,710
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history — 102 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesesperanto
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.isort])
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/lfnovo/esperanto#readme
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsanthropic, embeddings, gemini, langchain, language-model, openai
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://github.com/lfnovo/esperanto#readme
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 26 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 44 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages11
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:esperanto@2.27.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 11 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

86Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/common_types/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/common_types/CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/providers/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/providers/CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/providers/embedding/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/providers/embedding/CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/providers/llm/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/providers/llm/CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/providers/reranker/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/providers/reranker/CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/providers/stt/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/providers/stt/CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/providers/tts/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/providers/tts/CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/utils/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/utils/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/common_types/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/common_types/CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/providers/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/providers/CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/providers/embedding/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/providers/embedding/CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/providers/llm/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/providers/llm/CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/providers/reranker/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/providers/reranker/CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/providers/stt/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/providers/stt/CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/providers/tts/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/providers/tts/CLAUDE.md, src/esperanto/utils/AGENTS.md, src/esperanto/utils/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes13,098

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

82Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.isort])
11/11Static type checking — src/esperanto/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 7 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/esperanto/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.07
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/esperanto/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/193 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes51,195
source_files_sampled193
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

212GitHub stars
11contributors
196commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
68releases
1bus factor
26open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 50 ⇿
0Stars
50Forks
24Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040505022025-072026-022026-09
Major 0Minor 17Patch 7

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 13:25 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests29 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 26 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities44 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 2
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpydantic>=2.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIhttpx>=0.28.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 198

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 196 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIhttpx0.28.1direct
PyPIpydantic2.12.5direct
PyPIaccelerate1.12.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanthropic0.76.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.12.1indirect
PyPIappnope0.1.4indirect
PyPIasttokens3.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs25.4.0indirect
PyPIbackports-asyncio-runner1.2.0indirect
PyPIbackports-tarfile1.2.0indirect
PyPIbuild1.4.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.1.4indirect
PyPIcffi2.0.0indirect
PyPIcfgv3.5.0indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.4indirect
PyPIcohere5.21.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcomm0.2.3indirect
PyPIcoverage7.13.1indirect
PyPIcryptography46.0.3indirect
PyPIcuda-bindings12.9.4indirect
PyPIcuda-pathfinder1.3.3indirect
PyPIdebugpy1.8.19indirect
PyPIdecorator5.2.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-parser0.17.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.22.4indirect
PyPIeinops0.8.1indirect
PyPIesperanto2.27.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIexecuting2.2.1indirect
PyPIfastavro1.12.2indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.4indirect
PyPIfiletype1.2.0indirect
PyPIfsspec2026.1.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.47.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-genai1.60.0indirect
PyPIgroq0.37.1indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhf-xet1.2.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore1.0.9indirect
PyPIhttpx-sse0.4.3indirect
PyPIhuggingface-hub0.36.0indirect
PyPIid1.5.0indirect
PyPIidentify2.6.19indirect
PyPIidna3.11indirect
PyPIimportlib-metadata8.7.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIipykernel7.1.0indirect
PyPIipython8.38.0indirect
PyPIipython9.9.0indirect
PyPIipython-pygments-lexers1.1.1indirect
PyPIipywidgets8.1.8indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.4.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.19.2indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.6indirect
PyPIjiter0.12.0indirect
PyPIjoblib1.5.3indirect
PyPIjsonpatch1.33indirect
PyPIjsonpointer3.0.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema4.26.0indirect
PyPIjsonschema-specifications2025.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyter-client8.8.0indirect
PyPIjupyter-core5.9.1indirect
PyPIjupyterlab-widgets3.0.16indirect
PyPIkeyring25.7.0indirect
PyPIlangchain1.2.6indirect
PyPIlangchain-anthropic1.3.1indirect
PyPIlangchain-cohere0.6.0indirect
PyPIlangchain-core1.4.7indirect
PyPIlangchain-deepseek1.0.1indirect
PyPIlangchain-google-genai4.2.0indirect
PyPIlangchain-groq1.1.1indirect
PyPIlangchain-mistralai1.1.1indirect
PyPIlangchain-ollama1.0.1indirect
PyPIlangchain-openai1.1.7indirect
PyPIlangchain-protocol0.0.17indirect
PyPIlanggraph1.0.6indirect
PyPIlanggraph-checkpoint4.0.0indirect
PyPIlanggraph-prebuilt1.0.6indirect
PyPIlanggraph-sdk0.3.3indirect
PyPIlangsmith0.6.4indirect
PyPIlibrt0.7.8indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.3indirect
PyPImatplotlib-inline0.2.1indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImore-itertools10.8.0indirect
PyPImpmath1.3.0indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInest-asyncio1.6.0indirect
PyPInetworkx3.4.2indirect
PyPInetworkx3.6.1indirect
PyPInh30.3.2indirect
PyPInodeenv1.10.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.2.6indirect
PyPInumpy2.4.1indirect
PyPInvidia-cublas-cu1212.8.4.1indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-cupti-cu1212.8.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu1212.8.93indirect
PyPInvidia-cuda-runtime-cu1212.8.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cudnn-cu129.10.2.21indirect
PyPInvidia-cufft-cu1211.3.3.83indirect
PyPInvidia-cufile-cu121.13.1.3indirect
PyPInvidia-curand-cu1210.3.9.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cusolver-cu1211.7.3.90indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparse-cu1212.5.8.93indirect
PyPInvidia-cusparselt-cu120.7.1indirect
PyPInvidia-nccl-cu122.27.5indirect
PyPInvidia-nvjitlink-cu1212.8.93indirect
PyPInvidia-nvshmem-cu123.4.5indirect
PyPInvidia-nvtx-cu1212.8.90indirect
PyPIollama0.6.1indirect
PyPIopenai2.15.0indirect
PyPIorjson3.11.5indirect
PyPIormsgpack1.12.2indirect
PyPIpackaging25.0indirect
PyPIparso0.8.5indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.3indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.5.1indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit4.6.0indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52indirect
PyPIpsutil7.2.1indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpure-eval0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.2indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.2indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.41.5indirect
PyPIpygments2.19.2indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.2indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio1.3.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.0.0indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.15.1indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.4.2indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.1indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIpyzmq27.1.0indirect
PyPIreadme-renderer44.0indirect
PyPIreferencing0.37.0indirect
PyPIregex2026.1.15indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.5indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIresponses0.25.8indirect
PyPIrfc39862.0.0indirect
PyPIrich14.2.0indirect
PyPIrpds-py0.30.0indirect
PyPIrsa4.9.1indirect
PyPIruff0.14.13indirect
PyPIsafetensors0.7.0indirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.7.2indirect
PyPIscikit-learn1.8.0indirect
PyPIscipy1.15.3indirect
PyPIscipy1.17.0indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIsentence-transformers5.2.0indirect
PyPIsetuptools80.10.1indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIstack-data0.6.3indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPItenacity9.1.2indirect
PyPIthreadpoolctl3.6.0indirect
PyPItiktoken0.12.0indirect
PyPItokenizers0.22.2indirect
PyPItomli2.4.0indirect
PyPItorch2.10.0indirect
PyPItornado6.5.4indirect
PyPItqdm4.67.1indirect
PyPItraitlets5.14.3indirect
PyPItransformers4.57.6indirect
PyPItriton3.6.0indirect
PyPItwine6.2.0indirect
PyPItypes-jsonschema4.26.0.20260408indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.32.4.20260107indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.6.3indirect
PyPIuuid-utils0.14.0indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.5.1indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.3.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets15.0.1indirect
PyPIwidgetsnbextension4.0.15indirect
PyPIxxhash3.6.0indirect
PyPIzipp3.23.0indirect
PyPIzstandard0.25.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:esperanto@2.27.0 pulls in 11 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with lfnovo/esperanto. Read them side by side →

96TanStack/ai🤖 Type-safe, provider-agnostic TypeScript AI SDK for streaming chat, tool calling, agents, and multimodal apps across OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, React, Vue, Svelte, and Solid.Exceptional96yamadashy/repomix📦 Repomix is a powerful tool that packs your entire repository into a single, AI-friendly file. Perfect for when you need to feed your codebase to Large Language Models (LLMs) or other AI tools like Claude, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Perplexity, Gemini, Gemma, Llama, Grok, and more.Exceptional98langchain-ai/langchainThe agent engineering platform.Exceptional97langchain4j/langchain4jLangChain4j is an idiomatic, open-source Java library for building LLM-powered applications on the JVM. It offers a unified API over popular LLM providers and vector stores, and makes implementing tool calling (including MCP support), agents and RAG easy. It integrates seamlessly with enterprise Java frameworks like Quarkus and Spring Boot.Exceptional96diegosouzapw/OmniRouteNever stop coding. Free MIT AI gateway: one endpoint, 352 providers (150+ free), 1200+ models Kimi, Claude, GPT, Gemini, GLM, DeepSeek, MiniMax. Works with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Cline & Copilot. Quota-aware auto-fallback, RTK+Caveman compression saves 15-95% tokens, MCP/A2A, Desktop/PWA. Built by 550+ contributorsExceptional96vercel/aiThe AI Toolkit for TypeScript. From the creators of Next.js, the AI SDK is a free open-source library for building AI-powered applications and agents Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.