Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-18 02:37 UTC

lighttiger2505 / sqls

SQL language server written in Go.

GoMIT★ 1,326 stars⑂ 88 forkssince Oct 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolEditor extensionhow this is determined

lighttiger2505/sqls holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Security (48/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

71
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

71
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

sqls-serverOrganization
7 followers2 public repossince Dec 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/sqls-server/sqlspoints to another repo — not scoredv0.2.48-492 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

71Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
4.2/36Commit cadence6/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume143 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year143
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year6
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases30 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 2 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~202.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count30
latest_release_tagv0.2.48
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases202.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
50.6/60Stars1,326 stars
16.2/25Forks88 forks
5.3/15Watchers10 watchers
Inputs used
forks88
stars1,326
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 65% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth28 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 33 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled28
top_contributor_share0.65
How it's scored
22.1/42Issue resolution52% of issues closed
26/30PR acceptance112/129 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs112
open_issues38
closed_issues42
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.525
closed_unmerged_prs17
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
6.5/25Owner reach7 followers of sqls-server
8.6/25Track record2 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers7
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginsqls-server
public_repos2
account_age_days941
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslanguage-server-protocol, autocomplete, sql, language-server
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

48Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 33 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.8

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/81 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes44,724
source_files_sampled81
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,326GitHub stars
28contributors
143commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
30releases
1bus factor
38open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • go package 'github.com/sqls-server/sqls' points at a different repository (https://github.com/sqls-server/sqls); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-18 02:37 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests15 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 33 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/CodinGame/h2gov0.6.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/denisenkom/go-mssqldbv0.12.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-sql-driver/mysqlv1.10.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/godror/godrorv0.51.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v4v4.18.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/jfcote87/sshdbv0.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/sourcegraph/jsonrpc2v0.2.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v2v2.27.7go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/ClickHouse/clickhouse-go/v2v2.47.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/k0kubun/ppv3.0.1+incompatiblego.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.48go.mod
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/tablewriterv1.1.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/vertica/vertica-sql-gov1.3.7go.mod
All dependencies 67

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 51 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/clickhouse/clickhouse-go/v2v2.47.0direct
Gogithub.com/codingame/h2gov0.6.1direct
Gogithub.com/denisenkom/go-mssqldbv0.12.3direct
Gogithub.com/go-sql-driver/mysqlv1.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/godror/godrorv0.51.0direct
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v4v4.18.3direct
Gogithub.com/jfcote87/sshdbv0.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/k0kubun/ppv3.0.1+incompatibledirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.48direct
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/tablewriterv1.1.4direct
Gogithub.com/sourcegraph/jsonrpc2v0.2.1direct
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v2v2.27.7direct
Gogithub.com/vertica/vertica-sql-gov1.3.7direct
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v2v2.4.0direct
Gofilippo.io/edwards25519v1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/andybalholm/brotliv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clickhouse/ch-gov0.73.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/displaywidthv0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2v2.0.7indirect
Gogithub.com/elastic/go-sysinfov1.15.5indirect
Gogithub.com/elastic/go-windowsv1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-faster/cityv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-faster/errorsv0.7.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logfmt/logfmtv0.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-jsonv0.10.6indirect
Gogithub.com/godror/knownpbv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/golang-sql/civilv0.0.0-20220223132316-b832511892a9indirect
Gogithub.com/golang-sql/sqlexpv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/chunkreader/v2v2.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgconnv1.14.3indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgiov1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgpassfilev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgproto3/v2v2.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgservicefilev0.0.0-20240606120523-5a60cdf6a761indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgtypev1.14.4indirect
Gogithub.com/k0kubun/colorstringv0.0.0-20150214042306-9440f1994b88indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.22indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.24indirect
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/catv0.0.0-20250911104152-50322a0618f6indirect
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/errorsv1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/llv0.1.8indirect
Gogithub.com/paulmach/orbv0.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pierrec/lz4/v4v4.1.27indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfsv0.21.1indirect
Gogithub.com/russross/blackfriday/v2v2.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/segmentio/asmv1.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/shopspring/decimalv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.4indirect
Gogithub.com/victoriametrics/easyprotov1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xrash/smetricsv0.0.0-20250705151800-55b8f293f342indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.44.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260709172345-9ea1abe57597indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gohowett.net/plistv1.0.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.